Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They must think we’re all a bunch of brainwashed idiot groupthinkers to buy into this narrative they’re pushing. It’s quite insulting.

When are we going to find out who all the mysterious and creepy out of state cars belonged to that allegedly visited the kid’s house a week before this happened? Kind of glossing over that, aren’t they.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those on the right saying the left are dangerous and violent...

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2025/09/12/is-radical-left-violence-really-on-the-rise-in-america

https://ccjs.umd.edu/feature/umd-led-study-shows-disparities-violence-among-extremist-groups

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/countering-organized-violence-in-the-united-states/

https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-rise-of-political-violence-in-the-united-states/

I have yet to find a study that validates that the left is mor violent than the right. To the contrary, the right is 6x-8x more violent than the left.

So stop the lying and gaslighting and certainly put a stop to what the Administration is threatening.

For goodness sake. The president was shot at…twice no less. Throw all the flawed studies you want, but surely some introspection is called for.

The first shooting in Pennsylvania, the shooter had no ideology. He seemed like a loner and a troubled kid and was looking for fame. I don’t know anything about the second shooting.

Reagan was shot by someone who was trying to get attention of Jody Foster.

Assassinations often don’t have any ideology. The shooters are just looking for notoriety.

The Butler shooter was mad about Epstein.

lol! Before the election. If you are going to claim something like that you need to cite your source. No evidence on that.

The Epstein connection seems to have been based on a fake insta post.

There is still no know motive but it is known that the shooter was a conservative.

The Trump shooter had a list of events to target that included a Biden rally and the Democratic National Convention, the Trump rally was just first and closest.

Yep, these kids radicalized online don’t have a straight ideology. I know we want to subscribe political leanings to them, but we’ll find out probably with this Robinson the same thing. The through line: extreme online, nihilistic, and easy access to guns.

I wonder how soon before we find out assets, agents and intel spooks made up over half of this naive and lost kid’s orbit.

He was neither lost nor naive, well possibly a little naive as he was framed for murder. Could have been on the spectrum which makes this even more pathetic. He was an asset to Charlie Kirk.

Who r u talking about?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tyler Robinson is such a perfect metaphor for America.

Both were once a smart, promising kid with a bright future. Maybe a little bit too in love with guns. Then they dropped out of the world, went down an internet rabbit hole, and became deranged.

Ok keep on perpetuating this utter ridiculous false story.

What’s false about it?

These are the facts imo
1. MAGA conveniently making trans/gay culture a scapegoat
2. The fact that Tyler Robinson is likely not left leaning
3. Tyler and Lance were fans of Kirk
4. They were cybersecurity hackers
5. This was done by forces trying to divide America society

This was an act done by a kid who was extremely online, raised with weapons of war.
There is zero evidence that he was in a conspiracy with Lance or that they were hackers. Stop watching black mirror.

True, I feel like our response should be more focused on the role social media plays in the development of these mass shooters- it’s a common denominator, and clearly dangerous for young minds. I think we can all unite in that theme.

United? Yeah, right. Try to ban porn or merely require 18+ age verification and look at the left’s response. The left knows how destructive porn is and what a rabbit hole it is on young minds. Porn literally digitally grooms kids. You think a sweet young Mormon boy woke up one day and was suddenly into trans furries or whatever the heck? That’s 10 years of brain destroying porn on a young mind.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those on the right saying the left are dangerous and violent...

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2025/09/12/is-radical-left-violence-really-on-the-rise-in-america

https://ccjs.umd.edu/feature/umd-led-study-shows-disparities-violence-among-extremist-groups

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/countering-organized-violence-in-the-united-states/

https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-rise-of-political-violence-in-the-united-states/

I have yet to find a study that validates that the left is mor violent than the right. To the contrary, the right is 6x-8x more violent than the left.

So stop the lying and gaslighting and certainly put a stop to what the Administration is threatening.

For goodness sake. The president was shot at…twice no less. Throw all the flawed studies you want, but surely some introspection is called for.

The first shooting in Pennsylvania, the shooter had no ideology. He seemed like a loner and a troubled kid and was looking for fame. I don’t know anything about the second shooting.

Reagan was shot by someone who was trying to get attention of Jody Foster.

Assassinations often don’t have any ideology. The shooters are just looking for notoriety.

The Butler shooter was mad about Epstein.

lol! Before the election. If you are going to claim something like that you need to cite your source. No evidence on that.

The Epstein connection seems to have been based on a fake insta post.

There is still no know motive but it is known that the shooter was a conservative.

The Trump shooter had a list of events to target that included a Biden rally and the Democratic National Convention, the Trump rally was just first and closest.

Yep, these kids radicalized online don’t have a straight ideology. I know we want to subscribe political leanings to them, but we’ll find out probably with this Robinson the same thing. The through line: extreme online, nihilistic, and easy access to guns.

I wonder how soon before we find out assets, agents and intel spooks made up over half of this naive and lost kid’s orbit.

He was neither lost nor naive, well possibly a little naive as he was framed for murder. Could have been on the spectrum which makes this even more pathetic. He was an asset to Charlie Kirk.

Who r u talking about?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tyler Robinson is such a perfect metaphor for America.

Both were once a smart, promising kid with a bright future. Maybe a little bit too in love with guns. Then they dropped out of the world, went down an internet rabbit hole, and became deranged.

Ok keep on perpetuating this utter ridiculous false story.

What’s false about it?

These are the facts imo
1. MAGA conveniently making trans/gay culture a scapegoat
2. The fact that Tyler Robinson is likely not left leaning
3. Tyler and Lance were fans of Kirk
4. They were cybersecurity hackers
5. This was done by forces trying to divide America society

This was an act done by a kid who was extremely online, raised with weapons of war.
There is zero evidence that he was in a conspiracy with Lance or that they were hackers. Stop watching black mirror.

True, I feel like our response should be more focused on the role social media plays in the development of these mass shooters- it’s a common denominator, and clearly dangerous for young minds. I think we can all unite in that theme.

Yes, and it’s a big serious theme.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those on the right saying the left are dangerous and violent...

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2025/09/12/is-radical-left-violence-really-on-the-rise-in-america

https://ccjs.umd.edu/feature/umd-led-study-shows-disparities-violence-among-extremist-groups

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/countering-organized-violence-in-the-united-states/

https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-rise-of-political-violence-in-the-united-states/

I have yet to find a study that validates that the left is mor violent than the right. To the contrary, the right is 6x-8x more violent than the left.

So stop the lying and gaslighting and certainly put a stop to what the Administration is threatening.

For goodness sake. The president was shot at…twice no less. Throw all the flawed studies you want, but surely some introspection is called for.

The first shooting in Pennsylvania, the shooter had no ideology. He seemed like a loner and a troubled kid and was looking for fame. I don’t know anything about the second shooting.

Reagan was shot by someone who was trying to get attention of Jody Foster.

Assassinations often don’t have any ideology. The shooters are just looking for notoriety.

The Butler shooter was mad about Epstein.

lol! Before the election. If you are going to claim something like that you need to cite your source. No evidence on that.

The Epstein connection seems to have been based on a fake insta post.

There is still no know motive but it is known that the shooter was a conservative.

The Trump shooter had a list of events to target that included a Biden rally and the Democratic National Convention, the Trump rally was just first and closest.

Yep, these kids radicalized online don’t have a straight ideology. I know we want to subscribe political leanings to them, but we’ll find out probably with this Robinson the same thing. The through line: extreme online, nihilistic, and easy access to guns.

I wonder how soon before we find out assets, agents and intel spooks made up over half of this naive and lost kid’s orbit.

He was neither lost nor naive, well possibly a little naive as he was framed for murder. Could have been on the spectrum which makes this even more pathetic. He was an asset to Charlie Kirk.

Anonymous wrote:This is the proof the FBI has on the epic romance of the shooter and his roommate. They also know this young man puts spaghetti on his sandwiches and once wore a furry yellow hat. This is what Bongino said on Sunday:

"From the information we've accumulated, both forensically and digitally, in the comms between the two and some of the statements from family and friends that there was a relationship here that may have been beyond platonic. I think we have a good body of information at this point indicating that.

Cox directly contradicts him on the Sunday shows and said that the roommate was being helpful. Yet, clearly he DIDN'T say they were in a relationship.

Pathetic.

https://www.newsweek.com/lance-twiggs-tyler-robinson-partner-social-media-2129970

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tyler Robinson is such a perfect metaphor for America.

Both were once a smart, promising kid with a bright future. Maybe a little bit too in love with guns. Then they dropped out of the world, went down an internet rabbit hole, and became deranged.

Ok keep on perpetuating this utter ridiculous false story.

What’s false about it?

These are the facts imo
1. MAGA conveniently making trans/gay culture a scapegoat
2. The fact that Tyler Robinson is likely not left leaning
3. Tyler and Lance were fans of Kirk
4. They were cybersecurity hackers
5. This was done by forces trying to divide America society

This was an act done by a kid who was extremely online, raised with weapons of war.
There is zero evidence that he was in a conspiracy with Lance or that they were hackers. Stop watching black mirror.

True, I feel like our response should be more focused on the role social media plays in the development of these mass shooters- it’s a common denominator, and clearly dangerous for young minds. I think we can all unite in that theme.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They must think we’re all a bunch of brainwashed idiot groupthinkers to buy into this narrative they’re pushing. It’s quite insulting.

When are we going to find out who all the mysterious and creepy out of state cars belonged to that allegedly visited the kid’s house a week before this happened? Kind of glossing over that, aren’t they.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tyler Robinson is such a perfect metaphor for America.

Both were once a smart, promising kid with a bright future. Maybe a little bit too in love with guns. Then they dropped out of the world, went down an internet rabbit hole, and became deranged.

Ok keep on perpetuating this utter ridiculous false story.

What’s false about it?

These are the facts imo
1. MAGA conveniently making trans/gay culture a scapegoat
2. The fact that Tyler Robinson is likely not left leaning
3. Tyler and Lance were fans of Kirk
4. They were cybersecurity hackers
5. This was done by forces trying to divide America society

This was an act done by a kid who was extremely online, raised with weapons of war.
There is zero evidence that he was in a conspiracy with Lance or that they were hackers. Stop watching black mirror.

True, I feel like our response should be more focused on the role social media plays in the development of these mass shooters- it’s a common denominator, and clearly dangerous for young minds. I think we can all unite in that theme.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can't stand that all the MAGA morons and their conspiracy addled friends have found DCUM. Makes this place a disaster zone. Please return to QANON and Truth Social.

The cancer spreads.

Everywhere you look, MAGA. It's terrible. Sometimes I wonder if I am the last non-MAGA in the DMV!

I’d bet that most of them are posting from PA and MD and a lot of them aren’t even human. Just a room full of Chinese and Russian cell phones.

Trying to desperately influence the four people posting on this thread. Sure.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those on the right saying the left are dangerous and violent...

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2025/09/12/is-radical-left-violence-really-on-the-rise-in-america

https://ccjs.umd.edu/feature/umd-led-study-shows-disparities-violence-among-extremist-groups

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/countering-organized-violence-in-the-united-states/

https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-rise-of-political-violence-in-the-united-states/

I have yet to find a study that validates that the left is mor violent than the right. To the contrary, the right is 6x-8x more violent than the left.

So stop the lying and gaslighting and certainly put a stop to what the Administration is threatening.

For goodness sake. The president was shot at…twice no less. Throw all the flawed studies you want, but surely some introspection is called for.

The first shooting in Pennsylvania, the shooter had no ideology. He seemed like a loner and a troubled kid and was looking for fame. I don’t know anything about the second shooting.

Reagan was shot by someone who was trying to get attention of Jody Foster.

Assassinations often don’t have any ideology. The shooters are just looking for notoriety.

The Butler shooter was mad about Epstein.

lol! Before the election. If you are going to claim something like that you need to cite your source. No evidence on that.

The Epstein connection seems to have been based on a fake insta post.

There is still no know motive but it is known that the shooter was a conservative.

The Trump shooter had a list of events to target that included a Biden rally and the Democratic National Convention, the Trump rally was just first and closest.

Yep, these kids radicalized online don’t have a straight ideology. I know we want to subscribe political leanings to them, but we’ll find out probably with this Robinson the same thing. The through line: extreme online, nihilistic, and easy access to guns.

I wonder how soon before we find out assets, agents and intel spooks made up over half of this naive and lost kid’s orbit.

Anonymous wrote:They must think we’re all a bunch of brainwashed idiot groupthinkers to buy into this narrative they’re pushing. It’s quite insulting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those on the right saying the left are dangerous and violent...

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2025/09/12/is-radical-left-violence-really-on-the-rise-in-america

https://ccjs.umd.edu/feature/umd-led-study-shows-disparities-violence-among-extremist-groups

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/countering-organized-violence-in-the-united-states/

https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-rise-of-political-violence-in-the-united-states/

I have yet to find a study that validates that the left is mor violent than the right. To the contrary, the right is 6x-8x more violent than the left.

So stop the lying and gaslighting and certainly put a stop to what the Administration is threatening.

For goodness sake. The president was shot at…twice no less. Throw all the flawed studies you want, but surely some introspection is called for.

The first shooting in Pennsylvania, the shooter had no ideology. He seemed like a loner and a troubled kid and was looking for fame. I don’t know anything about the second shooting.

Reagan was shot by someone who was trying to get attention of Jody Foster.

Assassinations often don’t have any ideology. The shooters are just looking for notoriety.

The Butler shooter was mad about Epstein.

lol! Before the election. If you are going to claim something like that you need to cite your source. No evidence on that.

The Epstein connection seems to have been based on a fake insta post.

There is still no know motive but it is known that the shooter was a conservative.

The Trump shooter had a list of events to target that included a Biden rally and the Democratic National Convention, the Trump rally was just first and closest.

Yep, these kids radicalized online don’t have a straight ideology. I know we want to subscribe political leanings to them, but we’ll find out probably with this Robinson the same thing. The through line: extreme online, nihilistic, and easy access to guns.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They must think we’re all a bunch of brainwashed idiot groupthinkers to buy into this narrative they’re pushing. It’s quite insulting.

Hey, it's worked so many times before. Can you blame them for trying again?