Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, this is super weird. From the Medium articlehttps://medium.com/@macarthur.cliff/the-tara-reade-case-eight-things-the-media-wont-tell-you-27d3ca14978). Again, hyperlinks and original tweets are provided in the article.

Tara Reade’s hatred for Biden is rooted in her April 3, 2019 interview with The Union.

After the interview, journalists researched her background and discovered her article Bring on the Light, where she heaps praise upon Putin and condemns America. This is also the post where she claims to have left DC to protest American imperialism. When the article (which Tara deleted) was revealed to the public, she was mocked for it on Twitter, and some called her a “Russian asset.”

Tara became extremely upset, and blamed the Biden campaign for her troubles. Between April 2019 and March 2020 she authored more than 75 tweets accusing Joe Biden of labeling her a “Russian agent.”

Reade’s obsession went beyond mere tweets. When she went to Time’s Up with her sexual assault allegation, they put her in touch with several lawyers. Salon interviewed those lawyers, and they all told the same story: Reade didn’t care about pursuing a case against Biden, she wanted the lawyers to stop people from calling her a Russian agent on Twitter. Salon contacted Reade herself and she confirmed that was her goal.
Reade told Salon she wasn’t interested in suing Biden. Instead, she was angry “about the smears about being a Russian agent” from Biden supporters and was hoping a lawyer could find a way to stop them. One law firm Reade spoke with confirmed that they would not take a case with the ambiguous goal of trying to shut down people on social media who were speculating about an accuser being a “Russian agent.”

Reade also told Business Insider that she filed a police report with the DC Metro Police (in which she doesn’t name Joe Biden) not because she actually wanted an investigation, but because she hoped it would protect her from Twitter attacks.

None of this proves or disproves Biden raped her.
Didn't Weinstein rape several women who remained friends with him after? Rape is weird. Victims don't have to follow a playbook.

Oh I’m sorry, was Biden still in a position to offer her a movie role?

Are you implying a former Senator and Vice President and possible Presidential nominee is powerless to affect Reade?

Are you implying that she was still in his orbit or even remembered by him AT ALL before this?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, this is super weird. From the Medium articlehttps://medium.com/@macarthur.cliff/the-tara-reade-case-eight-things-the-media-wont-tell-you-27d3ca14978). Again, hyperlinks and original tweets are provided in the article.

Tara Reade’s hatred for Biden is rooted in her April 3, 2019 interview with The Union.

After the interview, journalists researched her background and discovered her article Bring on the Light, where she heaps praise upon Putin and condemns America. This is also the post where she claims to have left DC to protest American imperialism. When the article (which Tara deleted) was revealed to the public, she was mocked for it on Twitter, and some called her a “Russian asset.”

Tara became extremely upset, and blamed the Biden campaign for her troubles. Between April 2019 and March 2020 she authored more than 75 tweets accusing Joe Biden of labeling her a “Russian agent.”

Reade’s obsession went beyond mere tweets. When she went to Time’s Up with her sexual assault allegation, they put her in touch with several lawyers. Salon interviewed those lawyers, and they all told the same story: Reade didn’t care about pursuing a case against Biden, she wanted the lawyers to stop people from calling her a Russian agent on Twitter. Salon contacted Reade herself and she confirmed that was her goal.
Reade told Salon she wasn’t interested in suing Biden. Instead, she was angry “about the smears about being a Russian agent” from Biden supporters and was hoping a lawyer could find a way to stop them. One law firm Reade spoke with confirmed that they would not take a case with the ambiguous goal of trying to shut down people on social media who were speculating about an accuser being a “Russian agent.”

Reade also told Business Insider that she filed a police report with the DC Metro Police (in which she doesn’t name Joe Biden) not because she actually wanted an investigation, but because she hoped it would protect her from Twitter attacks.

None of this proves or disproves Biden raped her.
Didn't Weinstein rape several women who remained friends with him after? Rape is weird. Victims don't have to follow a playbook.

Oh I’m sorry, was Biden still in a position to offer her a movie role?

Are you implying a former Senator and Vice President and possible Presidential nominee is powerless to affect Reade?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

None of this proves or disproves Biden raped her.
Didn't Weinstein rape several women who remained friends with him after? Rape is weird. Victims don't have to follow a playbook.

There is nowhere. Absolutely nowhere, where Reade claims Biden raped her.

This has evolved in the minds of the BernieBros and Russian bots.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, this is super weird. From the Medium articlehttps://medium.com/@macarthur.cliff/the-tara-reade-case-eight-things-the-media-wont-tell-you-27d3ca14978). Again, hyperlinks and original tweets are provided in the article.

Tara Reade’s hatred for Biden is rooted in her April 3, 2019 interview with The Union.

After the interview, journalists researched her background and discovered her article Bring on the Light, where she heaps praise upon Putin and condemns America. This is also the post where she claims to have left DC to protest American imperialism. When the article (which Tara deleted) was revealed to the public, she was mocked for it on Twitter, and some called her a “Russian asset.”

Tara became extremely upset, and blamed the Biden campaign for her troubles. Between April 2019 and March 2020 she authored more than 75 tweets accusing Joe Biden of labeling her a “Russian agent.”

Reade’s obsession went beyond mere tweets. When she went to Time’s Up with her sexual assault allegation, they put her in touch with several lawyers. Salon interviewed those lawyers, and they all told the same story: Reade didn’t care about pursuing a case against Biden, she wanted the lawyers to stop people from calling her a Russian agent on Twitter. Salon contacted Reade herself and she confirmed that was her goal.
Reade told Salon she wasn’t interested in suing Biden. Instead, she was angry “about the smears about being a Russian agent” from Biden supporters and was hoping a lawyer could find a way to stop them. One law firm Reade spoke with confirmed that they would not take a case with the ambiguous goal of trying to shut down people on social media who were speculating about an accuser being a “Russian agent.”

Reade also told Business Insider that she filed a police report with the DC Metro Police (in which she doesn’t name Joe Biden) not because she actually wanted an investigation, but because she hoped it would protect her from Twitter attacks.

None of this proves or disproves Biden raped her.
Didn't Weinstein rape several women who remained friends with him after? Rape is weird. Victims don't have to follow a playbook.

Oh I’m sorry, was Biden still in a position to offer her a movie role?

Anonymous wrote:

None of this proves or disproves Biden raped her.
Didn't Weinstein rape several women who remained friends with him after? Rape is weird. Victims don't have to follow a playbook.

Anonymous wrote:
Tara Reade was absolutely believed first and is still believed by tons of people completely uncritically. As Clifford MacArthur’s piece points out, almost all of the coverage has focused on reactions to the accusation and the political entanglements it is causing, and there has been very little interest in actually attempting to verify the story. Seriously people - read this. It wont bite you.
https://medium.com/@macarthur.cliff/the-tara-reade-case-eight-things-the-media-wont-tell-you-27d3ca14978

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, this is super weird. From the Medium articlehttps://medium.com/@macarthur.cliff/the-tara-reade-case-eight-things-the-media-wont-tell-you-27d3ca14978). Again, hyperlinks and original tweets are provided in the article.

Tara Reade’s hatred for Biden is rooted in her April 3, 2019 interview with The Union.

After the interview, journalists researched her background and discovered her article Bring on the Light, where she heaps praise upon Putin and condemns America. This is also the post where she claims to have left DC to protest American imperialism. When the article (which Tara deleted) was revealed to the public, she was mocked for it on Twitter, and some called her a “Russian asset.”

Tara became extremely upset, and blamed the Biden campaign for her troubles. Between April 2019 and March 2020 she authored more than 75 tweets accusing Joe Biden of labeling her a “Russian agent.”

Reade’s obsession went beyond mere tweets. When she went to Time’s Up with her sexual assault allegation, they put her in touch with several lawyers. Salon interviewed those lawyers, and they all told the same story: Reade didn’t care about pursuing a case against Biden, she wanted the lawyers to stop people from calling her a Russian agent on Twitter. Salon contacted Reade herself and she confirmed that was her goal.
Reade told Salon she wasn’t interested in suing Biden. Instead, she was angry “about the smears about being a Russian agent” from Biden supporters and was hoping a lawyer could find a way to stop them. One law firm Reade spoke with confirmed that they would not take a case with the ambiguous goal of trying to shut down people on social media who were speculating about an accuser being a “Russian agent.”

Reade also told Business Insider that she filed a police report with the DC Metro Police (in which she doesn’t name Joe Biden) not because she actually wanted an investigation, but because she hoped it would protect her from Twitter attacks.

None of this proves or disproves Biden raped her.
Didn't Weinstein rape several women who remained friends with him after? Rape is weird. Victims don't have to follow a playbook.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

For those of you who were insisting that no one says "believe all women"...well, this sure looks like they do.

+1
I would even say Biden believes more women than the hypocrites on this website do.

Since when does “presume she’s telling the truth” equate to “believe all women, regardless”?

Top pp, is English your native language?

Ok, I'll bite. What do YOU think Biden was saying in this quote? What qualifier is present in his statement?

Yes, I'd like to know this to. What is this imaginary qualifier that the PP is insisting Biden added?

And on another note, notice how the PP is mocking someone s/he assumes isn't a native English speaker? How xenophobic. How racist.

Do you understand parts of speech? There are no qualifiers.

Let’s break it down for you: “presume” is very different from “believe”.

I take it you don't understand synonyms. Let me illustrate for you: I presume you don't know what you're talking about. I believe you to be a twit. See?

NP. Presume and believe are not synonyms.

Yep. They are.
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english-thesaurus/presume

Ok. Imagine your daughter tells you she has been raped. What do you say:
1. I believe you.
2. I presume you are telling the truth.

Anonymous wrote:OK, this is super weird. From the Medium articlehttps://medium.com/@macarthur.cliff/the-tara-reade-case-eight-things-the-media-wont-tell-you-27d3ca14978). Again, hyperlinks and original tweets are provided in the article.

Tara Reade’s hatred for Biden is rooted in her April 3, 2019 interview with The Union.

After the interview, journalists researched her background and discovered her article Bring on the Light, where she heaps praise upon Putin and condemns America. This is also the post where she claims to have left DC to protest American imperialism. When the article (which Tara deleted) was revealed to the public, she was mocked for it on Twitter, and some called her a “Russian asset.”

Tara became extremely upset, and blamed the Biden campaign for her troubles. Between April 2019 and March 2020 she authored more than 75 tweets accusing Joe Biden of labeling her a “Russian agent.”

Reade’s obsession went beyond mere tweets. When she went to Time’s Up with her sexual assault allegation, they put her in touch with several lawyers. Salon interviewed those lawyers, and they all told the same story: Reade didn’t care about pursuing a case against Biden, she wanted the lawyers to stop people from calling her a Russian agent on Twitter. Salon contacted Reade herself and she confirmed that was her goal.
Reade told Salon she wasn’t interested in suing Biden. Instead, she was angry “about the smears about being a Russian agent” from Biden supporters and was hoping a lawyer could find a way to stop them. One law firm Reade spoke with confirmed that they would not take a case with the ambiguous goal of trying to shut down people on social media who were speculating about an accuser being a “Russian agent.”

Reade also told Business Insider that she filed a police report with the DC Metro Police (in which she doesn’t name Joe Biden) not because she actually wanted an investigation, but because she hoped it would protect her from Twitter attacks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

For those of you who were insisting that no one says "believe all women"...well, this sure looks like they do.

+1
I would even say Biden believes more women than the hypocrites on this website do.

Since when does “presume she’s telling the truth” equate to “believe all women, regardless”?

Top pp, is English your native language?

Ok, I'll bite. What do YOU think Biden was saying in this quote? What qualifier is present in his statement?

Yes, I'd like to know this to. What is this imaginary qualifier that the PP is insisting Biden added?

And on another note, notice how the PP is mocking someone s/he assumes isn't a native English speaker? How xenophobic. How racist.

Do you understand parts of speech? There are no qualifiers.

Let’s break it down for you: “presume” is very different from “believe”.

I take it you don't understand synonyms. Let me illustrate for you: I presume you don't know what you're talking about. I believe you to be a twit. See?

NP. Presume and believe are not synonyms.

Yep. They are.
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english-thesaurus/presume

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

For those of you who were insisting that no one says "believe all women"...well, this sure looks like they do.

+1
I would even say Biden believes more women than the hypocrites on this website do.

Since when does “presume she’s telling the truth” equate to “believe all women, regardless”?

Top pp, is English your native language?

Ok, I'll bite. What do YOU think Biden was saying in this quote? What qualifier is present in his statement?

Yes, I'd like to know this to. What is this imaginary qualifier that the PP is insisting Biden added?

And on another note, notice how the PP is mocking someone s/he assumes isn't a native English speaker? How xenophobic. How racist.

Do you understand parts of speech? There are no qualifiers.

Let’s break it down for you: “presume” is very different from “believe”.

I take it you don't understand synonyms. Let me illustrate for you: I presume you don't know what you're talking about. I believe you to be a twit. See?

NP. Presume and believe are not synonyms.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

For those of you who were insisting that no one says "believe all women"...well, this sure looks like they do.

+1
I would even say Biden believes more women than the hypocrites on this website do.

Since when does “presume she’s telling the truth” equate to “believe all women, regardless”?

Top pp, is English your native language?

Ok, I'll bite. What do YOU think Biden was saying in this quote? What qualifier is present in his statement?

Yes, I'd like to know this to. What is this imaginary qualifier that the PP is insisting Biden added?

And on another note, notice how the PP is mocking someone s/he assumes isn't a native English speaker? How xenophobic. How racist.

Do you understand parts of speech? There are no qualifiers.

Let’s break it down for you: “presume” is very different from “believe”.

I take it you don't understand synonyms. Let me illustrate for you: I presume you don't know what you're talking about. I believe you to be a twit. See?

Sure I do:

I believe you don't know what you're talking about. I assume you to be a twit.