Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Executive Privilege declared. So much for checks and balances.

SHM. Why does the GOP hate our country so much?

Why does Obama hate our country so much?

https://www.propublica.org/article/the-facts-behind-obamas-executive-privilege-claim

Give me a break! You know Trump is a wanna be dictator.

Anonymous wrote:First it was a "witch hunt."
Then it was Mueller is a Democrat. (He isn't.)
Then it was a witch hunt by a pack of liberal Dems.
Then it was Barr's BS four page summary of 400+ pages of the Mueller report.
Then Trump took a "victory tour" and touted that the entire report should be released, because he had been "completely exonerated."
Trump then said it was okay with him to release the full report and fine with him if Mueller testifies. .
Then we find out Mueller has challenged Barr's whitewash, in calls and letters, specifically the 10 instances of obstruction.
We now know that Barr/Trump's lap dog has lied to Congress.
Now Trump doesn't want the report released nor have Mueller testify.

Nice try, friend.

I could go through a long list of where we were the day after the election to where we are now in terms of how the Democrats, aided by some higher ups in the IC, have tried to unseat a duly elected president. But, I won't revisit history. It is shameful.

Mueller has not "challenged" Barr's version. In fact, Barr asked him if he had issue with the accuracy of anything he said and Mueller said no.
Barr did not lie to Congress. He knows better.
In fact, after today's performance (and that is what it is.... theatrical performance) by the Dems proves what most of us already know. Barr knows the law better than these Democrat hacks. They are asking for Barr to do something that is against the law. Most of these idiots were lawyers. They seem to have forgotten the law during their stint in Congress.

The whole report was never going to be released. Barr always said it would be redacted. We all knew this.
And, in reality, Barr didn't have to release ANY of the report to Congress or the American people. But, he did.
You folks are insane. And, have fully demonstrated what you do when you get control of one of the houses of Congress.
I sincerely hope the American people decide they don't approve of your actions and vote the Democrats out.

First it was a "witch hunt."
Then it was Mueller is a Democrat. (He isn't.)
Then it was a witch hunt by a pack of liberal Dems.
Then it was Barr's BS four page summary of 400+ pages of the Mueller report.
Then Trump took a "victory tour" and touted that the entire report should be released, because he had been "completely exonerated."
Trump then said it was okay with him to release the full report and fine with him if Mueller testifies. .
Then we find out Mueller has challenged Barr's whitewash, in calls and letters, specifically the 10 instances of obstruction.
We now know that Barr/Trump's lap dog has lied to Congress.
Now Trump doesn't want the report released nor have Mueller testify.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Executive Privilege declared. So much for checks and balances.

SHM. Why does the GOP hate our country so much?

Why does Obama hate our country so much?

https://www.propublica.org/article/the-facts-behind-obamas-executive-privilege-claim

Anonymous wrote:Executive Privilege declared. So much for checks and balances.

Womp womp.

Case closed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Executive Privilege declared. So much for checks and balances.

SHM. Why does the GOP hate our country so much?

Trump is like Putin and Kim Jong-Un. They’re cut from the same cloth.

Anonymous wrote:Executive Privilege declared. So much for checks and balances.

SHM. Why does the GOP hate our country so much?

Executive Privilege declared. So much for checks and balances.

Tea Party: "We must see Obama's Harvard transcripts and his long-form birth certificate! A president is not entitled to privacy!"


Trump Party: "We don't need to see Trump's tax returns or his bank records. A president is entitled to privacy."

Once a report is out, you can’t call it back and claim executive privilege. Besides Mueller didn’t talk to Trump and the information gained by interview, answers and grand jury was waiver of any executive privilege.

I guess we should all delete our PDFs.

Now the Adminstration is threatening to invoke privilege over the entire Mueller report:

https://twitter.com/ErinBanco/status/1125946774118703107

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Wray says "spying" is not the word he'd use when it comes to court-authorized intelligence gathering. "To me the key question is making sure it's done by the book, consistent with our lawful authorities. That's the key question, different people use different colloquial terms"

I'm also watching that hearing. He did not say it wasn't spying--just that is not the word he would use. "A rose by any other name........."

I don't think a legally obtained warrant is "spying" in the manner that Barr implied in his testimony.

It is spying and it blatantly violates the constitution.

Those who ordered it (or who followed unconstitutional orders) must resign immediately; they have all violated their oath of office and trampled on the Constitution they swore to protect.

It was a counter-intelligence investigation initiated because our allies reported nefarious activity. The letter of the law was followed to a T. If you don't like the FISA program, take it up with the GOP that crammed the Patriot Act on the US after 9/11.

This is yet to be ascertained. We should know more soon enough.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Wray says "spying" is not the word he'd use when it comes to court-authorized intelligence gathering. "To me the key question is making sure it's done by the book, consistent with our lawful authorities. That's the key question, different people use different colloquial terms"

I'm also watching that hearing. He did not say it wasn't spying--just that is not the word he would use. "A rose by any other name........."

I don't think a legally obtained warrant is "spying" in the manner that Barr implied in his testimony.

It is spying and it blatantly violates the constitution.

Those who ordered it (or who followed unconstitutional orders) must resign immediately; they have all violated their oath of office and trampled on the Constitution they swore to protect.

It was a counter-intelligence investigation initiated because our allies reported nefarious activity. The letter of the law was followed to a T. If you don't like the FISA program, take it up with the GOP that crammed the Patriot Act on the US after 9/11.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Wray says "spying" is not the word he'd use when it comes to court-authorized intelligence gathering. "To me the key question is making sure it's done by the book, consistent with our lawful authorities. That's the key question, different people use different colloquial terms"

I'm also watching that hearing. He did not say it wasn't spying--just that is not the word he would use. "A rose by any other name........."

I don't think a legally obtained warrant is "spying" in the manner that Barr implied in his testimony.

It is spying and it blatantly violates the constitution.

Those who ordered it (or who followed unconstitutional orders) must resign immediately; they have all violated their oath of office and trampled on the Constitution they swore to protect.

Your post is funny.

Hahaha.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Wray says "spying" is not the word he'd use when it comes to court-authorized intelligence gathering. "To me the key question is making sure it's done by the book, consistent with our lawful authorities. That's the key question, different people use different colloquial terms"

I'm also watching that hearing. He did not say it wasn't spying--just that is not the word he would use. "A rose by any other name........."

I don't think a legally obtained warrant is "spying" in the manner that Barr implied in his testimony.

It is spying and it blatantly violates the constitution.

Those who ordered it (or who followed unconstitutional orders) must resign immediately; they have all violated their oath of office and trampled on the Constitution they swore to protect.