Anonymous
12/01/2021 01:24
Subject: Re:To you, what's the bottom of the "elite" colleges?
Elitest:
Harvard
Yale
Princeton
Stanford
MIT
Elites:
Columbia*
UPenn
Caltech
Chicago
Duke
Northwestern
Dartmouth
Brown
Cornell
Hopkins
Berkeley
*Has a strong case to be in the "Elitest" category.
Harvard
Yale
Princeton
Stanford
MIT
Elites:
Columbia*
UPenn
Caltech
Chicago
Duke
Northwestern
Dartmouth
Brown
Cornell
Hopkins
Berkeley
*Has a strong case to be in the "Elitest" category.
Anonymous
12/01/2021 01:17
Subject: Re:To you, what's the bottom of the "elite" colleges?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HYPSM has distinct shared attributes:
They have the top 5 endowments of all colleges.
They don't use binding early decisions.
They have the top 5 yield rate of all top colleges.
Their graduates are leaders of the country in academics, politics, law, tech, and business. Harvard has 7 Rhodes scholars this year. Princeton and Stanford have Nobel Price winners this year ...
HYP is the only legitimate equivalent to UK’s Oxbridge.
Once you start adding a sports school like Stanford and a technology school like MIT, pretty soon you’ll have people from Tufts demanding it should be HYPSMT.
HYP and Oxbridge are the only world class WASPs.
This is so lame, who gives a flying eff about WASPs
WASPs are too cultured (incompetent) to engage in lowly (intelligent) matters like science and technology.
Translated it for you.
Anonymous
11/30/2021 23:56
Subject: Re:To you, what's the bottom of the "elite" colleges?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HYPSM has distinct shared attributes:
They have the top 5 endowments of all colleges.
They don't use binding early decisions.
They have the top 5 yield rate of all top colleges.
Their graduates are leaders of the country in academics, politics, law, tech, and business. Harvard has 7 Rhodes scholars this year. Princeton and Stanford have Nobel Price winners this year ...
HYP is the only legitimate equivalent to UK’s Oxbridge.
Once you start adding a sports school like Stanford and a technology school like MIT, pretty soon you’ll have people from Tufts demanding it should be HYPSMT.
HYP and Oxbridge are the only world class WASPs.
This is so lame, who gives a flying eff about WASPs
WASPs are too cultured to engage in lowly matters like science and technology. Stanford and MIT are not elite schools.
HYP have not been WASP schools for a long time. Princeton and Yale have been dominated by Stanford and MIT in terms of top students' favorite destinations. Better bring your WASPness crap to somewhere else cuz it stinks.
Anonymous
11/30/2021 23:52
Subject: Re:To you, what's the bottom of the "elite" colleges?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HYPSM has distinct shared attributes:
They have the top 5 endowments of all colleges.
They don't use binding early decisions.
They have the top 5 yield rate of all top colleges.
Their graduates are leaders of the country in academics, politics, law, tech, and business. Harvard has 7 Rhodes scholars this year. Princeton and Stanford have Nobel Price winners this year ...
HYP is the only legitimate equivalent to UK’s Oxbridge.
Once you start adding a sports school like Stanford and a technology school like MIT, pretty soon you’ll have people from Tufts demanding it should be HYPSMT.
HYP and Oxbridge are the only world class WASPs.
This is so lame, who gives a flying eff about WASPs
WASPs are too cultured to engage in lowly matters like science and technology. Stanford and MIT are not elite schools.
What a shame! You think you can continue stealing other's hard work like you did. You'll be further outcast in every major area and you'll soon be history.
Soon? WASPs are a complete non-issue, irrelevant in this day and age. Have been for decades.
Anonymous
11/30/2021 23:50
Subject: To you, what's the bottom of the "elite" colleges?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think layman elite is probably just HYPSM.
Most of the nation has no idea what Hopkins, UChicago, Brown even are, let alone how insanely difficult it is to get into Duke, Dartmouth, Cornell.
I think you nailed it.
Elites:
Harvard
Yale
Princeton
Stanford
MIT
Just missed the cut:
Columbia
UPenn
Caltech
Chicago
Duke
Northwestern
Dartmouth
Brown
Cornell
Hopkins
Berkeley
+1
US News dropped Stanford to #6 bc it’s a sports school that gives full scholarships. No “merit” scholarships at elite schools where they have the pick of the best students.
I think this is the best description
No, sports are more important than academics. Therefore giving full scholarships to athletes is an indication of being elite. After all, HYP originated from a football association.
Says a low IQ wannabe?
Anonymous
11/30/2021 23:49
Subject: To you, what's the bottom of the "elite" colleges?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think layman elite is probably just HYPSM.
Most of the nation has no idea what Hopkins, UChicago, Brown even are, let alone how insanely difficult it is to get into Duke, Dartmouth, Cornell.
I think you nailed it.
Elites:
Harvard
Yale
Princeton
Stanford
MIT
Just missed the cut:
Columbia
UPenn
Caltech
Chicago
Duke
Northwestern
Dartmouth
Brown
Cornell
Hopkins
Berkeley
+1
US News dropped Stanford to #6 bc it’s a sports school that gives full scholarships. No “merit” scholarships at elite schools where they have the pick of the best students.
I think this is the best description
No, sports are more important than academics. Therefore giving full scholarships to athletes is an indication of being elite. After all, HYP originated from a football association.
Anonymous
11/30/2021 23:48
Subject: Re:To you, what's the bottom of the "elite" colleges?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HYPSM has distinct shared attributes:
They have the top 5 endowments of all colleges.
They don't use binding early decisions.
They have the top 5 yield rate of all top colleges.
Their graduates are leaders of the country in academics, politics, law, tech, and business. Harvard has 7 Rhodes scholars this year. Princeton and Stanford have Nobel Price winners this year ...
HYP is the only legitimate equivalent to UK’s Oxbridge.
Once you start adding a sports school like Stanford and a technology school like MIT, pretty soon you’ll have people from Tufts demanding it should be HYPSMT.
HYP and Oxbridge are the only world class WASPs.
This is so lame, who gives a flying eff about WASPs
WASPs are too cultured to engage in lowly matters like science and technology. Stanford and MIT are not elite schools.
What a shame! You think you can continue stealing other's hard work like you did. You'll be further outcast in every major area and you'll soon be history.
Anonymous
11/30/2021 23:46
Subject: To you, what's the bottom of the "elite" colleges?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think layman elite is probably just HYPSM.
Most of the nation has no idea what Hopkins, UChicago, Brown even are, let alone how insanely difficult it is to get into Duke, Dartmouth, Cornell.
I think you nailed it.
Elites:
Harvard
Yale
Princeton
Stanford
MIT
Just missed the cut:
Columbia
UPenn
Caltech
Chicago
Duke
Northwestern
Dartmouth
Brown
Cornell
Hopkins
Berkeley
+1
US News dropped Stanford to #6 bc it’s a sports school that gives full scholarships. No “merit” scholarships at elite schools where they have the pick of the best students.
I think this is the best description
Anonymous
11/30/2021 23:43
Subject: Re:To you, what's the bottom of the "elite" colleges?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HYPSM has distinct shared attributes:
They have the top 5 endowments of all colleges.
They don't use binding early decisions.
They have the top 5 yield rate of all top colleges.
Their graduates are leaders of the country in academics, politics, law, tech, and business. Harvard has 7 Rhodes scholars this year. Princeton and Stanford have Nobel Price winners this year ...
HYP is the only legitimate equivalent to UK’s Oxbridge.
Once you start adding a sports school like Stanford and a technology school like MIT, pretty soon you’ll have people from Tufts demanding it should be HYPSMT.
HYP and Oxbridge are the only world class WASPs.
This is so lame, who gives a flying eff about WASPs
WASPs are too cultured to engage in lowly matters like science and technology. Stanford and MIT are not elite schools.
Hahahahaha
Anonymous
11/30/2021 23:36
Subject: Re:To you, what's the bottom of the "elite" colleges?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HYPSM has distinct shared attributes:
They have the top 5 endowments of all colleges.
They don't use binding early decisions.
They have the top 5 yield rate of all top colleges.
Their graduates are leaders of the country in academics, politics, law, tech, and business. Harvard has 7 Rhodes scholars this year. Princeton and Stanford have Nobel Price winners this year ...
HYP is the only legitimate equivalent to UK’s Oxbridge.
Once you start adding a sports school like Stanford and a technology school like MIT, pretty soon you’ll have people from Tufts demanding it should be HYPSMT.
HYP and Oxbridge are the only world class WASPs.
This is so lame, who gives a flying eff about WASPs
WASPs are too cultured to engage in lowly matters like science and technology. Stanford and MIT are not elite schools.
Your days as thieves are numbered.
Anonymous
11/30/2021 23:34
Subject: Re:To you, what's the bottom of the "elite" colleges?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HYPSM has distinct shared attributes:
They have the top 5 endowments of all colleges.
They don't use binding early decisions.
They have the top 5 yield rate of all top colleges.
Their graduates are leaders of the country in academics, politics, law, tech, and business. Harvard has 7 Rhodes scholars this year. Princeton and Stanford have Nobel Price winners this year ...
HYP is the only legitimate equivalent to UK’s Oxbridge.
Once you start adding a sports school like Stanford and a technology school like MIT, pretty soon you’ll have people from Tufts demanding it should be HYPSMT.
HYP and Oxbridge are the only world class WASPs.
This is so lame, who gives a flying eff about WASPs
WASPs are too cultured to engage in lowly matters like science and technology. Stanford and MIT are not elite schools.
Anonymous
11/30/2021 23:32
Subject: Re:To you, what's the bottom of the "elite" colleges?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HYPSM has distinct shared attributes:
They have the top 5 endowments of all colleges.
They don't use binding early decisions.
They have the top 5 yield rate of all top colleges.
Their graduates are leaders of the country in academics, politics, law, tech, and business. Harvard has 7 Rhodes scholars this year. Princeton and Stanford have Nobel Price winners this year ...
HYP is the only legitimate equivalent to UK’s Oxbridge.
Once you start adding a sports school like Stanford and a technology school like MIT, pretty soon you’ll have people from Tufts demanding it should be HYPSMT.
HYP and Oxbridge are the only world class WASPs.
This is so lame, who gives a flying eff about WASPs
Anonymous
11/30/2021 23:26
Subject: Re:To you, what's the bottom of the "elite" colleges?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HYPSM has distinct shared attributes:
They have the top 5 endowments of all colleges.
They don't use binding early decisions.
They have the top 5 yield rate of all top colleges.
Their graduates are leaders of the country in academics, politics, law, tech, and business. Harvard has 7 Rhodes scholars this year. Princeton and Stanford have Nobel Price winners this year ...
They don't have the top 5 amount of research funding.
They don't have the top 5 number of Nobel Laureates.
You see, you can pick any kinds of factors into comparison and get different top 5's.
So? No one says they are top 5 on everything. Harvard and MIT are in the top 5 of Nobel Laureates. Stanford, Yale, and Princeton are not that far behind. They also produce outstanding research. All other top schools use binding decisions to lock students yet don't have as high the yield rate. There isn't much debate about HYPSM being top 5.
Yes, it's absolutely rationale to believe that the early admissions policy for a given university's undergraduate college is the one and only measure of its merit. Graduate schools and institutional research do not exist because they are utterly trivial matters.
Anonymous
11/30/2021 23:21
Subject: Re:To you, what's the bottom of the "elite" colleges?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HYPSM has distinct shared attributes:
They have the top 5 endowments of all colleges.
They don't use binding early decisions.
They have the top 5 yield rate of all top colleges.
Their graduates are leaders of the country in academics, politics, law, tech, and business. Harvard has 7 Rhodes scholars this year. Princeton and Stanford have Nobel Price winners this year ...
They don't have the top 5 amount of research funding.
They don't have the top 5 number of Nobel Laureates.
You see, you can pick any kinds of factors into comparison and get different top 5's.
So? No one says they are top 5 on everything. Harvard and MIT are in the top 5 of Nobel Laureates. Stanford, Yale, and Princeton are not that far behind. They also produce outstanding research. All other top schools use binding decisions to lock students yet don't have as high the yield rate. There isn't much debate about HYPSM being top 5.
Not sure how PP concluded there isn’t much debate about Stanford being in T5, when in fact, many Stanford students agree with US News’ #6 ranking.
Anonymous
11/30/2021 22:55
Subject: Re:To you, what's the bottom of the "elite" colleges?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HYPSM has distinct shared attributes:
They have the top 5 endowments of all colleges.
They don't use binding early decisions.
They have the top 5 yield rate of all top colleges.
Their graduates are leaders of the country in academics, politics, law, tech, and business. Harvard has 7 Rhodes scholars this year. Princeton and Stanford have Nobel Price winners this year ...
They don't have the top 5 amount of research funding.
They don't have the top 5 number of Nobel Laureates.
You see, you can pick any kinds of factors into comparison and get different top 5's.
So? No one says they are top 5 on everything. Harvard and MIT are in the top 5 of Nobel Laureates. Stanford, Yale, and Princeton are not that far behind. They also produce outstanding research. All other top schools use binding decisions to lock students yet don't have as high the yield rate. There isn't much debate about HYPSM being top 5.