Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I continue to be amazed at the lack of coverage on this story. Looks like the 4th Estate is circling the wagons until the evidence is irrefutable. With the FBI working the case and a DOJ that will focus on the law, not politics we will eventually know the truth. Who wants to bet that this story has a link to Wikileaks, Seth Rich and the Russian fake story of hacking?

I want to bet. Terms?

DP. What do you mean by "terms"? Thanks.

What are we betting and what constitutes winning? I am willing to eat an edible cricket (per the suggestion) if this case turns out to have no connections to Wikileaks, Seth Rich, and the Russian hack of the DNC. Of course, the other person is going to have to make his/her identity known so we can make sure he/she eats the cricket when he/she loses the bet.

I'm curious, Jeff. Do you still believe Awan is an innocent who was just going on vacation?

Everyone is entitled to the presumption of innocence. Being Muslim doesn't change that, as much as you might wish that it did. That said, the evidence that he lied on his mortgage application is compelling. But, do I think he was involved with Seth Rich? No. Do I think he was involved with the DNC hack? No. Do I think he leaked anything to Wikileaks? No.

Do you think he leaked anything to Pakistani government?

DP. The silence is astonishing.

Dear astonished right winger,

How'd that Susan Rice story pan out for you?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I continue to be amazed at the lack of coverage on this story. Looks like the 4th Estate is circling the wagons until the evidence is irrefutable. With the FBI working the case and a DOJ that will focus on the law, not politics we will eventually know the truth. Who wants to bet that this story has a link to Wikileaks, Seth Rich and the Russian fake story of hacking?

I want to bet. Terms?

DP. What do you mean by "terms"? Thanks.

What are we betting and what constitutes winning? I am willing to eat an edible cricket (per the suggestion) if this case turns out to have no connections to Wikileaks, Seth Rich, and the Russian hack of the DNC. Of course, the other person is going to have to make his/her identity known so we can make sure he/she eats the cricket when he/she loses the bet.

I'm curious, Jeff. Do you still believe Awan is an innocent who was just going on vacation?

Everyone is entitled to the presumption of innocence. Being Muslim doesn't change that, as much as you might wish that it did. That said, the evidence that he lied on his mortgage application is compelling. But, do I think he was involved with Seth Rich? No. Do I think he was involved with the DNC hack? No. Do I think he leaked anything to Wikileaks? No.

Do you think he leaked anything to Pakistani government?

DP. The silence is astonishing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I continue to be amazed at the lack of coverage on this story. Looks like the 4th Estate is circling the wagons until the evidence is irrefutable. With the FBI working the case and a DOJ that will focus on the law, not politics we will eventually know the truth. Who wants to bet that this story has a link to Wikileaks, Seth Rich and the Russian fake story of hacking?

I want to bet. Terms?

DP. What do you mean by "terms"? Thanks.

What are we betting and what constitutes winning? I am willing to eat an edible cricket (per the suggestion) if this case turns out to have no connections to Wikileaks, Seth Rich, and the Russian hack of the DNC. Of course, the other person is going to have to make his/her identity known so we can make sure he/she eats the cricket when he/she loses the bet.

I'm curious, Jeff. Do you still believe Awan is an innocent who was just going on vacation?

Everyone is entitled to the presumption of innocence. Being Muslim doesn't change that, as much as you might wish that it did. That said, the evidence that he lied on his mortgage application is compelling. But, do I think he was involved with Seth Rich? No. Do I think he was involved with the DNC hack? No. Do I think he leaked anything to Wikileaks? No.

Do you think he leaked anything to Pakistani government?

DP. The silence is astonishing.

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I continue to be amazed at the lack of coverage on this story. Looks like the 4th Estate is circling the wagons until the evidence is irrefutable. With the FBI working the case and a DOJ that will focus on the law, not politics we will eventually know the truth. Who wants to bet that this story has a link to Wikileaks, Seth Rich and the Russian fake story of hacking?

I want to bet. Terms?

DP. What do you mean by "terms"? Thanks.

What are we betting and what constitutes winning? I am willing to eat an edible cricket (per the suggestion) if this case turns out to have no connections to Wikileaks, Seth Rich, and the Russian hack of the DNC. Of course, the other person is going to have to make his/her identity known so we can make sure he/she eats the cricket when he/she loses the bet.

I'm curious, Jeff. Do you still believe Awan is an innocent who was just going on vacation?

Everyone is entitled to the presumption of innocence. Being Muslim doesn't change that, as much as you might wish that it did. That said, the evidence that he lied on his mortgage application is compelling. But, do I think he was involved with Seth Rich? No. Do I think he was involved with the DNC hack? No. Do I think he leaked anything to Wikileaks? No.

Do you think he leaked anything to Pakistani government?

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I continue to be amazed at the lack of coverage on this story. Looks like the 4th Estate is circling the wagons until the evidence is irrefutable. With the FBI working the case and a DOJ that will focus on the law, not politics we will eventually know the truth. Who wants to bet that this story has a link to Wikileaks, Seth Rich and the Russian fake story of hacking?

I want to bet. Terms?

DP. What do you mean by "terms"? Thanks.

What are we betting and what constitutes winning? I am willing to eat an edible cricket (per the suggestion) if this case turns out to have no connections to Wikileaks, Seth Rich, and the Russian hack of the DNC. Of course, the other person is going to have to make his/her identity known so we can make sure he/she eats the cricket when he/she loses the bet.

I'm curious, Jeff. Do you still believe Awan is an innocent who was just going on vacation?

Everyone is entitled to the presumption of innocence. Being Muslim doesn't change that, as much as you might wish that it did. That said, the evidence that he lied on his mortgage application is compelling. But, do I think he was involved with Seth Rich? No. Do I think he was involved with the DNC hack? No. Do I think he leaked anything to Wikileaks? No.

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This looks interesting:


https://awantimeline.com

LOL! Comet Ping Pong all over again. So, Awan is responsible for the Iraq invasion?

That timeline had some strange things included. It was kind of interesting, though. I did find the part about the murder of the car dealer a little off the wall. However, if there is a connect to Awan then, maybe it belongs there.

However, listing DWS brother as influencing the case is a little far. I've posted this before. There is no "the assistant US Attorney" in the DC office. There are many, many. I looked it up once--I'm sure it is well over 100. I cannot imagine they would let him near this case. But, I guess stranger things have happened.

I found one blatant false statement the first time I read over the timeline. I would not depend on it for accuracy.

I am amazed that someone would produce a website like that and even more amazed that the poster -- though a known troll -- would post a link here. Just think of his sources of info if this is the stuff that is fed to him? It's stuff like this that gives credence to the fake news industry and paid trolls.

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This looks interesting:


https://awantimeline.com

LOL! Comet Ping Pong all over again. So, Awan is responsible for the Iraq invasion?

That timeline had some strange things included. It was kind of interesting, though. I did find the part about the murder of the car dealer a little off the wall. However, if there is a connect to Awan then, maybe it belongs there.

However, listing DWS brother as influencing the case is a little far. I've posted this before. There is no "the assistant US Attorney" in the DC office. There are many, many. I looked it up once--I'm sure it is well over 100. I cannot imagine they would let him near this case. But, I guess stranger things have happened.

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This looks interesting:


https://awantimeline.com

LOL! Comet Ping Pong all over again. So, Awan is responsible for the Iraq invasion?

Anonymous wrote:This looks interesting:


https://awantimeline.com

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I continue to be amazed at the lack of coverage on this story. Looks like the 4th Estate is circling the wagons until the evidence is irrefutable. With the FBI working the case and a DOJ that will focus on the law, not politics we will eventually know the truth. Who wants to bet that this story has a link to Wikileaks, Seth Rich and the Russian fake story of hacking?

I want to bet. Terms?

DP. What do you mean by "terms"? Thanks.

What are we betting and what constitutes winning? I am willing to eat an edible cricket (per the suggestion) if this case turns out to have no connections to Wikileaks, Seth Rich, and the Russian hack of the DNC. Of course, the other person is going to have to make his/her identity known so we can make sure he/she eats the cricket when he/she loses the bet.

I'm curious, Jeff. Do you still believe Awan is an innocent who was just going on vacation?

Everyone is entitled to the presumption of innocence. Being Muslim doesn't change that, as much as you might wish that it did. That said, the evidence that he lied on his mortgage application is compelling. But, do I think he was involved with Seth Rich? No. Do I think he was involved with the DNC hack? No. Do I think he leaked anything to Wikileaks? No.

I'm the bet guy Jeff and agree Awan wasn't involved with the DNC hack or Seth Rich, so don't know what we are betting. Awan did have access to DWS account who was involved in the hack and possibly may know about Seth Rich, that is the connection. Jeff. as for eating a cricket, its not fair as during survival training back in the day I ate more bugs than you will ever eat.

No, the PP is actually full of sh#t. The Fairness Doctrine didn't require the FCC or any other bureaucrat to decide what's "fair." It merely stipulated that an FCC-licensed broadcaster had to present the opposite points of view on a contentious issue of the public interest. If a broadcaster did not present the opposite point of view, viewers could file a complaint against the broadcaster. Networks had plenty of editorial latitude - they just couldn't blatantly lie without getting push back.