Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP here-she's ready to move on and was looking for something to use to vilify him because she knows that simply wanting to end the relationship makes her look like the skank she is, especially since she was a homewrecker in the first place (not that I absolve Pitt). If I had to guess, Pitt disciplined their children like many "normal" people do because that's how he grew up and she was ok with that until she was no longer ok with him. He was a fool to think she could be anything other than what she is.

Reportedly they've had fights for years over the clash in parenting styles. The children have never been to school. One attended school for a short time before getting kicked out. AJ has recently said she thinks they should go to high school, that they need socialisation. That seems to be true, but I don't know if they'll be able to adjust to school and the expectations there.

This is incorrect. They were all at the same private school in Los Angeles as my own children. Unfortunately there were daily helicopter paparazzi above the playground and outside in the street at drop and pick up times. It was chaos and the kids found it stressful so at the end of the year they did not re-enroll.

Shh, no need to bring truth and facts to this thread. These banshees on DCUM see red and they are out to cyber lunch AJ. They are both making crap up and relying on triple heresay from rag tabloids that they normally would dismiss as unreliable. Their fangs are growing along with this throws. It's crazy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP here-she's ready to move on and was looking for something to use to vilify him because she knows that simply wanting to end the relationship makes her look like the skank she is, especially since she was a homewrecker in the first place (not that I absolve Pitt). If I had to guess, Pitt disciplined their children like many "normal" people do because that's how he grew up and she was ok with that until she was no longer ok with him. He was a fool to think she could be anything other than what she is.

Reportedly they've had fights for years over the clash in parenting styles. The children have never been to school. One attended school for a short time before getting kicked out. AJ has recently said she thinks they should go to high school, that they need socialisation. That seems to be true, but I don't know if they'll be able to adjust to school and the expectations there.

This is incorrect. They were all at the same private school in Los Angeles as my own children. Unfortunately there were daily helicopter paparazzi above the playground and outside in the street at drop and pick up times. It was chaos and the kids found it stressful so at the end of the year they did not re-enroll.

Anonymous wrote:Angelina Jolie is a bitch. Yippee doodle dandy that she does real humanitarian work. She will destroy Brad, just like she went out of her way to destroy JA with those photos.

Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, but the double standards, spite, and vitriol on this thread are really disturbing. I'm really hoping I don't know most of you IRL.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP here-she's ready to move on and was looking for something to use to vilify him because she knows that simply wanting to end the relationship makes her look like the skank she is, especially since she was a homewrecker in the first place (not that I absolve Pitt). If I had to guess, Pitt disciplined their children like many "normal" people do because that's how he grew up and she was ok with that until she was no longer ok with him. He was a fool to think she could be anything other than what she is.

Reportedly they've had fights for years over the clash in parenting styles. The children have never been to school. One attended school for a short time before getting kicked out. AJ has recently said she thinks they should go to high school, that they need socialisation. That seems to be true, but I don't know if they'll be able to adjust to school and the expectations there.

Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, but the double standards, spite, and vitriol on this thread are really disturbing. I'm really hoping I don't know most of you IRL.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Poor Brad. Hopefully he can find a nice normal girl.

He had one of those. Screw him.

Yeah because valid Jennifer anistosakis ( real name ) is so normal

+1

But somehow, people adore her.

JA could drown puppies and people would be all "oh well.. Some puppies need to be drowned". Not s peep hardly over JT and his pregnant girlfriend.

AJ does actual, real humanitarian work and she gets slammed. She's a home wrecker, etc.

It's so odd to me.

It doesn't seem sincere. She self-mutiliates, does heroin, makes out with her brother, carries around vials of blood, steals a husband, and then suddenly does real, humanitarian work. If she is sincere, more power to her. But if she has a "campaign" with "The Lady" (who is on her payroll) so she can get a title (like Lady AJ) than it's NOT sincere and is just power-hungry.

NO ONE adores JA so much that she could drown puppies. JA is so predictable, stable, normal that she would NOT drown puppies. (AJ, on the other hand, totally could and would shock and surprise no one.)

She was doing humanitarian work before she adopted her oldest son. That's how she decided to adopt him.

No one "steals" a husband. People do what they want. If you husband cheats on you, that's on him.

NP here. I'm going to weigh in, even thought I don't normally get in to celebrity gossip.

The thing about Angelina is Brad wasn't the first guy she started dating under dubious circumstances and then made a huge production of it. Billy Bob was with Laura Dern when he hooked up with Angelina. That's one thing, but even then, she made a huge scene about all of the sex they were having. I remember reading an interview early on where she described their intimate relationship. It seems like that was kind of obnoxious to parade her relationship around when he left someone else. She didn't have to go into detail about her sexual relationship with him, but she did that willingly.

So then she did the same thing when she hooked up with Brad Pitt, again even though he was with someone when they started dating. She could have been tactful, but she made their relationship very public and willingly did those weird photo shoots and so on.

So it seems that it's a pattern.

I don't fault a person for falling in love with someone who is taken. But I do fault them for handling it in a nasty and ostentatious way.

So true. Remember "We fucked in the car today" on the red carpet?
http://www.mtv.com/videos/misc/109842/angelina-billy-bob-come-clean-on-limo-sex.jhtml

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For all those saying they've yelled at their kids before, and that we should therefore give him the benefit of the doubt, don't you think this probably goes beyond yelling at him to get out of the way or stay out of it? She decided to leave him over this incident. I'm thinking he said something unforgivably mean to Maddox and both sides (including Pitt's legal team) admit that he got physical. So he pushed him at the very least but I suspect hit him as well.

So yeah, if my husband hit my teenage son in the face, he'd be out of there. One strike and you're out. You don't teach your children to put up with physical abuse.

No, I think she was looking to leave him and wanted dirt on him. The affair angle didn't play out so now she's going with abuse.

If he actually were abusive, and if she were a normal mother, she would divorce him quietly, depend upon the court to handle custody and visitation. Instead, she's setting up to handle the divorce publicly, to spin Pitt as a bad guy.

You must be a really slow person . Do you realize we're talking about Angelina Jolie here? Do you think there's such a thing as divorce him quietly when your name Angelina Jolie ? By the way what's your definition of 'normal mother' while you're at it . An incident happened and she took immediate actions , something that many of you DCUMers aren't able to do , at least based on the 'relationships forum'

Yea, most people are not super wealthy so they don't have the same options.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Poor Brad. Hopefully he can find a nice normal girl.

He had one of those. Screw him.

Yeah because valid Jennifer anistosakis ( real name ) is so normal

+1

But somehow, people adore her.

JA could drown puppies and people would be all "oh well.. Some puppies need to be drowned". Not s peep hardly over JT and his pregnant girlfriend.

AJ does actual, real humanitarian work and she gets slammed. She's a home wrecker, etc.

It's so odd to me.

It doesn't seem sincere. She self-mutiliates, does heroin, makes out with her brother, carries around vials of blood, steals a husband, and then suddenly does real, humanitarian work. If she is sincere, more power to her. But if she has a "campaign" with "The Lady" (who is on her payroll) so she can get a title (like Lady AJ) than it's NOT sincere and is just power-hungry.

NO ONE adores JA so much that she could drown puppies. JA is so predictable, stable, normal that she would NOT drown puppies. (AJ, on the other hand, totally could and would shock and surprise no one.)

She was doing humanitarian work before she adopted her oldest son. That's how she decided to adopt him.

No one "steals" a husband. People do what they want. If you husband cheats on you, that's on him.

NP here. I'm going to weigh in, even thought I don't normally get in to celebrity gossip.

The thing about Angelina is Brad wasn't the first guy she started dating under dubious circumstances and then made a huge production of it. Billy Bob was with Laura Dern when he hooked up with Angelina. That's one thing, but even then, she made a huge scene about all of the sex they were having. I remember reading an interview early on where she described their intimate relationship. It seems like that was kind of obnoxious to parade her relationship around when he left someone else. She didn't have to go into detail about her sexual relationship with him, but she did that willingly.

So then she did the same thing when she hooked up with Brad Pitt, again even though he was with someone when they started dating. She could have been tactful, but she made their relationship very public and willingly did those weird photo shoots and so on.

So it seems that it's a pattern.

I don't fault a person for falling in love with someone who is taken. But I do fault them for handling it in a nasty and ostentatious way.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP here-she's ready to move on and was looking for something to use to vilify him because she knows that simply wanting to end the relationship makes her look like the skank she is, especially since she was a homewrecker in the first place (not that I absolve Pitt). If I had to guess, Pitt disciplined their children like many "normal" people do because that's how he grew up and she was ok with that until she was no longer ok with him. He was a fool to think she could be anything other than what she is.

Reportedly they've had fights for years over the clash in parenting styles. The children have never been to school. One attended school for a short time before getting kicked out. AJ has recently said she thinks they should go to high school, that they need socialisation. That seems to be true, but I don't know if they'll be able to adjust to school and the expectations there.