Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Although probably some of you pedantic posters would argue that the woman who died during a tornado because a tree fell in her house wasn’t a victim since “she cHoSe to live in a place with tornados” or “she chose to have trees within the vicinity of her house”

It makes them feel safe to figure out why everyone who has a tragedy was somehow responsible.

This exactly.

It us called the Just World Hypothesis (a psychological defense mechanism).

See also, Fundamental Attribution Error.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bad judgment is not an accident, it’s negligence.

+1 Some people never want to accept resposibility for their choices and the results of their decisions.

You mean the dead ones?

Well people keep saying their families should sue. That’s not accepting responsibility.

So you’re slandering people who died based on what DCUM idiots say their families should do? Got it.

Who is slandering? It’s a true statement. It was objectively bad judgement to go out in that storm. It’s not a matter of opinion!

Judgment is subjective. I'm so happy for you that you can sit on your couch and judge people's decisions after the fact.

Judgmental cows with nothing better to do than monday morning quarterback about things they don't understand.

Really disgusting how they trash victims.

Do you think people are victims if they get harmed or die when they choose to go for a jog just before a hurricane, tornado, earthquake, bomb threat, etc?

NP. Of course. You, however, are free to keep yourself and your children inside.

You're welcome to take on Mother Nature, but you won't win.

Is winning never venturing outside your comfort zone?

These skiers including the men are just like the people who go to watch the waves during a hurricane and get swept away.

And then gloat about it accusing others of never really living or leaving their house if they don't want to see the giant swells up close and in person. How could they have known there was danger? It was an accident.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bad judgment is not an accident, it’s negligence.

+1 Some people never want to accept resposibility for their choices and the results of their decisions.

You mean the dead ones?

Well people keep saying their families should sue. That’s not accepting responsibility.

So you’re slandering people who died based on what DCUM idiots say their families should do? Got it.

Who is slandering? It’s a true statement. It was objectively bad judgement to go out in that storm. It’s not a matter of opinion!

Judgment is subjective. I'm so happy for you that you can sit on your couch and judge people's decisions after the fact.

Judgmental cows with nothing better to do than monday morning quarterback about things they don't understand.

Really disgusting how they trash victims.

Do you think people are victims if they get harmed or die when they choose to go for a jog just before a hurricane, tornado, earthquake, bomb threat, etc?

NP. Of course. You, however, are free to keep yourself and your children inside.

You're welcome to take on Mother Nature, but you won't win.

Is winning never venturing outside your comfort zone?

These skiers including the men are just like the people who go to watch the waves during a hurricane and get swept away.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Although probably some of you pedantic posters would argue that the woman who died during a tornado because a tree fell in her house wasn’t a victim since “she cHoSe to live in a place with tornados” or “she chose to have trees within the vicinity of her house”

It's really hard for you to accept responsibility for your actions isn't it? If you're ok with it why do you care what others think?

+1 truth well said

Anonymous wrote:Although probably some of you pedantic posters would argue that the woman who died during a tornado because a tree fell in her house wasn’t a victim since “she cHoSe to live in a place with tornados” or “she chose to have trees within the vicinity of her house”

It's really hard for you to accept responsibility for your actions isn't it? If you're ok with it why do you care what others think?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Although probably some of you pedantic posters would argue that the woman who died during a tornado because a tree fell in her house wasn’t a victim since “she cHoSe to live in a place with tornados” or “she chose to have trees within the vicinity of her house”

It makes them feel safe to figure out why everyone who has a tragedy was somehow responsible.

I think there are certain cases where a tragedy was entirely preventable and in other cases it’s not.

Anonymous wrote:Although probably some of you pedantic posters would argue that the woman who died during a tornado because a tree fell in her house wasn’t a victim since “she cHoSe to live in a place with tornados” or “she chose to have trees within the vicinity of her house”

Not at all the same.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bad judgment is not an accident, it’s negligence.

+1 Some people never want to accept resposibility for their choices and the results of their decisions.

You mean the dead ones?

Well people keep saying their families should sue. That’s not accepting responsibility.

So you’re slandering people who died based on what DCUM idiots say their families should do? Got it.

Who is slandering? It’s a true statement. It was objectively bad judgement to go out in that storm. It’s not a matter of opinion!

Judgment is subjective. I'm so happy for you that you can sit on your couch and judge people's decisions after the fact.

Judgmental cows with nothing better to do than monday morning quarterback about things they don't understand.

Really disgusting how they trash victims.

Do you think people are victims if they get harmed or die when they choose to go for a jog just before a hurricane, tornado, earthquake, bomb threat, etc?

NP. Of course. You, however, are free to keep yourself and your children inside.

You're welcome to take on Mother Nature, but you won't win.

Is winning never venturing outside your comfort zone?

Most people’s comfort zone would not include extreme storms. That’s hard to understand i guess.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bad judgment is not an accident, it’s negligence.

+1 Some people never want to accept resposibility for their choices and the results of their decisions.

You mean the dead ones?

Well people keep saying their families should sue. That’s not accepting responsibility.

So you’re slandering people who died based on what DCUM idiots say their families should do? Got it.

Who is slandering? It’s a true statement. It was objectively bad judgement to go out in that storm. It’s not a matter of opinion!

Judgment is subjective. I'm so happy for you that you can sit on your couch and judge people's decisions after the fact.

Judgmental cows with nothing better to do than monday morning quarterback about things they don't understand.

Really disgusting how they trash victims.

Do you think people are victims if they get harmed or die when they choose to go for a jog just before a hurricane, tornado, earthquake, bomb threat, etc?

NP. Of course. You, however, are free to keep yourself and your children inside.

You're welcome to take on Mother Nature, but you won't win.

Is winning never venturing outside your comfort zone?

Anonymous wrote:Although probably some of you pedantic posters would argue that the woman who died during a tornado because a tree fell in her house wasn’t a victim since “she cHoSe to live in a place with tornados” or “she chose to have trees within the vicinity of her house”

It makes them feel safe to figure out why everyone who has a tragedy was somehow responsible.

Although probably some of you pedantic posters would argue that the woman who died during a tornado because a tree fell in her house wasn’t a victim since “she cHoSe to live in a place with tornados” or “she chose to have trees within the vicinity of her house”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bad judgment is not an accident, it’s negligence.

+1 Some people never want to accept resposibility for their choices and the results of their decisions.

You mean the dead ones?

Well people keep saying their families should sue. That’s not accepting responsibility.

So you’re slandering people who died based on what DCUM idiots say their families should do? Got it.

Who is slandering? It’s a true statement. It was objectively bad judgement to go out in that storm. It’s not a matter of opinion!

Judgment is subjective. I'm so happy for you that you can sit on your couch and judge people's decisions after the fact.

Judgmental cows with nothing better to do than monday morning quarterback about things they don't understand.

Really disgusting how they trash victims.

Do you think people are victims if they get harmed or die when they choose to go for a jog just before a hurricane, tornado, earthquake, bomb threat, etc?

NP. Of course. You, however, are free to keep yourself and your children inside.

We are all free to.make choices, ill considered or otherwise. Doesn't make us victims when things go badly, unless you mean victims of our own stupidity. .

Dp. Whenever reporters talk about fatalities from a hurricane or a tornado, they always call them victims. Regardless of whether they died chasing a tornado (dumb) or when a tree fell on their house (unlucky).

Which makes sense since you can’t draw a bright line between dumb and unlucky.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bad judgment is not an accident, it’s negligence.

+1 Some people never want to accept resposibility for their choices and the results of their decisions.

You mean the dead ones?

Well people keep saying their families should sue. That’s not accepting responsibility.

So you’re slandering people who died based on what DCUM idiots say their families should do? Got it.

Who is slandering? It’s a true statement. It was objectively bad judgement to go out in that storm. It’s not a matter of opinion!

Judgment is subjective. I'm so happy for you that you can sit on your couch and judge people's decisions after the fact.

Judgmental cows with nothing better to do than monday morning quarterback about things they don't understand.

Really disgusting how they trash victims.

Do you think people are victims if they get harmed or die when they choose to go for a jog just before a hurricane, tornado, earthquake, bomb threat, etc?

NP. Of course. You, however, are free to keep yourself and your children inside.

You're welcome to take on Mother Nature, but you won't win.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bad judgment is not an accident, it’s negligence.

+1 Some people never want to accept resposibility for their choices and the results of their decisions.

You mean the dead ones?

Well people keep saying their families should sue. That’s not accepting responsibility.

So you’re slandering people who died based on what DCUM idiots say their families should do? Got it.

Who is slandering? It’s a true statement. It was objectively bad judgement to go out in that storm. It’s not a matter of opinion!

Judgment is subjective. I'm so happy for you that you can sit on your couch and judge people's decisions after the fact.

Judgmental cows with nothing better to do than monday morning quarterback about things they don't understand.

Really disgusting how they trash victims.

Do you think people are victims if they get harmed or die when they choose to go for a jog just before a hurricane, tornado, earthquake, bomb threat, etc?

NP. Of course. You, however, are free to keep yourself and your children inside.

We are all free to.make choices, ill considered or otherwise. Doesn't make us victims when things go badly, unless you mean victims of our own stupidity. .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bad judgment is not an accident, it’s negligence.

+1 Some people never want to accept resposibility for their choices and the results of their decisions.

You mean the dead ones?

Well people keep saying their families should sue. That’s not accepting responsibility.

So you’re slandering people who died based on what DCUM idiots say their families should do? Got it.

Who is slandering? It’s a true statement. It was objectively bad judgement to go out in that storm. It’s not a matter of opinion!

Judgment is subjective. I'm so happy for you that you can sit on your couch and judge people's decisions after the fact.

Judgmental cows with nothing better to do than monday morning quarterback about things they don't understand.

Really disgusting how they trash victims.

Do you think people are victims if they get harmed or die when they choose to go for a jog just before a hurricane, tornado, earthquake, bomb threat, etc?

NP. Of course. You, however, are free to keep yourself and your children inside.