Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The real idiots here are Schumer and Jeffries who played right into the GOP’s hands by making healthcare subsidies the hill they chose to die on. Now the WH can run roughshod and lay off thousands of more federal workers as Russ Vought works unopposed to bring his fever dream to fruition. The Dems will look like clueless impotent imbeciles from the sidelines.
OOH, mommy look what they made me do! Really PP, can't you come up with something better than this toddler BS.
This type of vitriol only tells me Ds know they’ve been played and outmaneuvered.
Trump is using it as an opportunity to do mass layoffs and permanently close whole parts of the federal bureaucracy.![]()
Right. But at what point will Trump actually try to govern the country. Also, when's he going to release those Epstein files?
Oh, he's governing. The fact that you don't like it tells everyone he is.
No, he's actually not. At least not democratically. He hasn't passed a budget. He can't adequately run the executive branch. All he's doing is destroying what he doesn't understand, and that's everything.
The House passed a CR. Democrats didn't go along in the Senate.
Oh well.
That's not the same thing as hashing out a budget based on stated priorities and debating it.
You idiots keep voting for GOP and Dem politicians and then magically expect different results. This is the definition of insanity and stupidity.
This is not a "both sides" thing no matter ho many times you try to post otherwise.
I'm so sick of the "both sides" posters. There are two very distinct sides. On one side we have the regular 99% of American people fighting to cling to some amount of control over their Federal Government. On the other side we have the ultra-wealthy political mega-donors who have gained 99.9% of control over our two corrupt major political parties.
I'm siding with the 99% of regular American people and I say eff you to the lost fools out there who are siding with the mega-donors when they themselves don't have the wealth to buy political influence. Be smarter!!
There are plenty of candidates out there who refuse contributions from mega-donors. You could at least support them.
This isn’t a discussion about elections, past or future. It is a discussion about the current government shutdown. Stay focused.
You are on every post with this both sides whining. No one cares. We have the government we have, and we are still allowed us discuss and debate the actions they are or are not taking.
And we will continue to have the dysfunctional Federal Government we have as long as you short-sighted dupes who fail to get the big picture while dwelling on snapshot in time moments of dysfunction and awfulness. History repeats itself. Learn from it.
What do you want people to do right now? Sit on our hands till 2026? Not care what’s happening to are fellow citizens? Not care that Congress is refusing to govern?
I honestly don’t get your point. What do you want people to do other than whine with you have both sides suck?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The real idiots here are Schumer and Jeffries who played right into the GOP’s hands by making healthcare subsidies the hill they chose to die on. Now the WH can run roughshod and lay off thousands of more federal workers as Russ Vought works unopposed to bring his fever dream to fruition. The Dems will look like clueless impotent imbeciles from the sidelines.
OOH, mommy look what they made me do! Really PP, can't you come up with something better than this toddler BS.
This type of vitriol only tells me Ds know they’ve been played and outmaneuvered.
Trump is using it as an opportunity to do mass layoffs and permanently close whole parts of the federal bureaucracy.![]()
Right. But at what point will Trump actually try to govern the country. Also, when's he going to release those Epstein files?
Oh, he's governing. The fact that you don't like it tells everyone he is.
No, he's actually not. At least not democratically. He hasn't passed a budget. He can't adequately run the executive branch. All he's doing is destroying what he doesn't understand, and that's everything.
The House passed a CR. Democrats didn't go along in the Senate.
Oh well.
That's not the same thing as hashing out a budget based on stated priorities and debating it.
You idiots keep voting for GOP and Dem politicians and then magically expect different results. This is the definition of insanity and stupidity.
This is not a "both sides" thing no matter ho many times you try to post otherwise.
I'm so sick of the "both sides" posters. There are two very distinct sides. On one side we have the regular 99% of American people fighting to cling to some amount of control over their Federal Government. On the other side we have the ultra-wealthy political mega-donors who have gained 99.9% of control over our two corrupt major political parties.
I'm siding with the 99% of regular American people and I say eff you to the lost fools out there who are siding with the mega-donors when they themselves don't have the wealth to buy political influence. Be smarter!!
There are plenty of candidates out there who refuse contributions from mega-donors. You could at least support them.
There are some but not plenty of national level GOP and Dem politicians out there who aren't mega-donor puppets and I do appreciate those politicians who choose to maintain their integrity over advancing their careers (looking at you AOC). Unfortunately for those politicians, their career ceilings are capped at a low level due to their refusal to play nice with money (looking at you AOC).
AOC? Please list AOC’s accomplishments in Congress. Tell us how many pieces of legislation she has authored and passed into law while in Congress? Give us examples of how effective she is and her hard work for the American people. Please. I want to like her but can’t find many examples of concrete work she has successfully completed.
You missed the point, pea-brain. AOC hasn't had much influence in Congress because she is shunned by her colleagues due to her refusal to play nice puppet with the mega-donors and her willingness to call out her colleagues for lining their pockets via what amounts to insider trading. Give me someone with AOC integrity any day over a Trump or Biden.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The real idiots here are Schumer and Jeffries who played right into the GOP’s hands by making healthcare subsidies the hill they chose to die on. Now the WH can run roughshod and lay off thousands of more federal workers as Russ Vought works unopposed to bring his fever dream to fruition. The Dems will look like clueless impotent imbeciles from the sidelines.
OOH, mommy look what they made me do! Really PP, can't you come up with something better than this toddler BS.
This type of vitriol only tells me Ds know they’ve been played and outmaneuvered.
Trump is using it as an opportunity to do mass layoffs and permanently close whole parts of the federal bureaucracy.![]()
Right. But at what point will Trump actually try to govern the country. Also, when's he going to release those Epstein files?
Oh, he's governing. The fact that you don't like it tells everyone he is.
No, he's actually not. At least not democratically. He hasn't passed a budget. He can't adequately run the executive branch. All he's doing is destroying what he doesn't understand, and that's everything.
The House passed a CR. Democrats didn't go along in the Senate.
Oh well.
That's not the same thing as hashing out a budget based on stated priorities and debating it.
You idiots keep voting for GOP and Dem politicians and then magically expect different results. This is the definition of insanity and stupidity.
This is not a "both sides" thing no matter ho many times you try to post otherwise.
I'm so sick of the "both sides" posters. There are two very distinct sides. On one side we have the regular 99% of American people fighting to cling to some amount of control over their Federal Government. On the other side we have the ultra-wealthy political mega-donors who have gained 99.9% of control over our two corrupt major political parties.
I'm siding with the 99% of regular American people and I say eff you to the lost fools out there who are siding with the mega-donors when they themselves don't have the wealth to buy political influence. Be smarter!!
There are plenty of candidates out there who refuse contributions from mega-donors. You could at least support them.
There are some but not plenty of national level GOP and Dem politicians out there who aren't mega-donor puppets and I do appreciate those politicians who choose to maintain their integrity over advancing their careers (looking at you AOC). Unfortunately for those politicians, their career ceilings are capped at a low level due to their refusal to play nice with money (looking at you AOC).
AOC? Please list AOC’s accomplishments in Congress. Tell us how many pieces of legislation she has authored and passed into law while in Congress? Give us examples of how effective she is and her hard work for the American people. Please. I want to like her but can’t find many examples of concrete work she has successfully completed.
You missed the point, pea-brain. AOC hasn't had much influence in Congress because she is shunned by her colleagues due to her refusal to play nice puppet with the mega-donors and her willingness to call out her colleagues for lining their pockets via what amounts to insider trading. Give me someone with AOC integrity any day over a Trump or Biden.
Right. She's a Bernie Sanders style radical. Therefore, she's not a great choice if the goal is to get things done. Why would this be different when she is President?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The real idiots here are Schumer and Jeffries who played right into the GOP’s hands by making healthcare subsidies the hill they chose to die on. Now the WH can run roughshod and lay off thousands of more federal workers as Russ Vought works unopposed to bring his fever dream to fruition. The Dems will look like clueless impotent imbeciles from the sidelines.
OOH, mommy look what they made me do! Really PP, can't you come up with something better than this toddler BS.
This type of vitriol only tells me Ds know they’ve been played and outmaneuvered.
Trump is using it as an opportunity to do mass layoffs and permanently close whole parts of the federal bureaucracy.![]()
Right. But at what point will Trump actually try to govern the country. Also, when's he going to release those Epstein files?
Oh, he's governing. The fact that you don't like it tells everyone he is.
No, he's actually not. At least not democratically. He hasn't passed a budget. He can't adequately run the executive branch. All he's doing is destroying what he doesn't understand, and that's everything.
The House passed a CR. Democrats didn't go along in the Senate.
Oh well.
That's not the same thing as hashing out a budget based on stated priorities and debating it.
You idiots keep voting for GOP and Dem politicians and then magically expect different results. This is the definition of insanity and stupidity.
This is not a "both sides" thing no matter ho many times you try to post otherwise.
I'm so sick of the "both sides" posters. There are two very distinct sides. On one side we have the regular 99% of American people fighting to cling to some amount of control over their Federal Government. On the other side we have the ultra-wealthy political mega-donors who have gained 99.9% of control over our two corrupt major political parties.
I'm siding with the 99% of regular American people and I say eff you to the lost fools out there who are siding with the mega-donors when they themselves don't have the wealth to buy political influence. Be smarter!!
There are plenty of candidates out there who refuse contributions from mega-donors. You could at least support them.
There are some but not plenty of national level GOP and Dem politicians out there who aren't mega-donor puppets and I do appreciate those politicians who choose to maintain their integrity over advancing their careers (looking at you AOC). Unfortunately for those politicians, their career ceilings are capped at a low level due to their refusal to play nice with money (looking at you AOC).
AOC? Please list AOC’s accomplishments in Congress. Tell us how many pieces of legislation she has authored and passed into law while in Congress? Give us examples of how effective she is and her hard work for the American people. Please. I want to like her but can’t find many examples of concrete work she has successfully completed.
You missed the point, pea-brain. AOC hasn't had much influence in Congress because she is shunned by her colleagues due to her refusal to play nice puppet with the mega-donors and her willingness to call out her colleagues for lining their pockets via what amounts to insider trading. Give me someone with AOC integrity any day over a Trump or Biden.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The real idiots here are Schumer and Jeffries who played right into the GOP’s hands by making healthcare subsidies the hill they chose to die on. Now the WH can run roughshod and lay off thousands of more federal workers as Russ Vought works unopposed to bring his fever dream to fruition. The Dems will look like clueless impotent imbeciles from the sidelines.
OOH, mommy look what they made me do! Really PP, can't you come up with something better than this toddler BS.
This type of vitriol only tells me Ds know they’ve been played and outmaneuvered.
Trump is using it as an opportunity to do mass layoffs and permanently close whole parts of the federal bureaucracy.![]()
Right. But at what point will Trump actually try to govern the country. Also, when's he going to release those Epstein files?
Oh, he's governing. The fact that you don't like it tells everyone he is.
No, he's actually not. At least not democratically. He hasn't passed a budget. He can't adequately run the executive branch. All he's doing is destroying what he doesn't understand, and that's everything.
The House passed a CR. Democrats didn't go along in the Senate.
Oh well.
That's not the same thing as hashing out a budget based on stated priorities and debating it.
You idiots keep voting for GOP and Dem politicians and then magically expect different results. This is the definition of insanity and stupidity.
This is not a "both sides" thing no matter ho many times you try to post otherwise.
I'm so sick of the "both sides" posters. There are two very distinct sides. On one side we have the regular 99% of American people fighting to cling to some amount of control over their Federal Government. On the other side we have the ultra-wealthy political mega-donors who have gained 99.9% of control over our two corrupt major political parties.
I'm siding with the 99% of regular American people and I say eff you to the lost fools out there who are siding with the mega-donors when they themselves don't have the wealth to buy political influence. Be smarter!!
There are plenty of candidates out there who refuse contributions from mega-donors. You could at least support them.
There are some but not plenty of national level GOP and Dem politicians out there who aren't mega-donor puppets and I do appreciate those politicians who choose to maintain their integrity over advancing their careers (looking at you AOC). Unfortunately for those politicians, their career ceilings are capped at a low level due to their refusal to play nice with money (looking at you AOC).
AOC? Please list AOC’s accomplishments in Congress. Tell us how many pieces of legislation she has authored and passed into law while in Congress? Give us examples of how effective she is and her hard work for the American people. Please. I want to like her but can’t find many examples of concrete work she has successfully completed.
Anonymous wrote:They have nine of 12 bills passed out of committee in the house.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The real idiots here are Schumer and Jeffries who played right into the GOP’s hands by making healthcare subsidies the hill they chose to die on. Now the WH can run roughshod and lay off thousands of more federal workers as Russ Vought works unopposed to bring his fever dream to fruition. The Dems will look like clueless impotent imbeciles from the sidelines.
OOH, mommy look what they made me do! Really PP, can't you come up with something better than this toddler BS.
This type of vitriol only tells me Ds know they’ve been played and outmaneuvered.
Trump is using it as an opportunity to do mass layoffs and permanently close whole parts of the federal bureaucracy.![]()
Right. But at what point will Trump actually try to govern the country. Also, when's he going to release those Epstein files?
Oh, he's governing. The fact that you don't like it tells everyone he is.
No, he's actually not. At least not democratically. He hasn't passed a budget. He can't adequately run the executive branch. All he's doing is destroying what he doesn't understand, and that's everything.
The House passed a CR. Democrats didn't go along in the Senate.
Oh well.
That's not the same thing as hashing out a budget based on stated priorities and debating it.
Meanwhile, they proposed continuing with the same funding that Democrats passed in March 2024, that has been continued three times already.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The real idiots here are Schumer and Jeffries who played right into the GOP’s hands by making healthcare subsidies the hill they chose to die on. Now the WH can run roughshod and lay off thousands of more federal workers as Russ Vought works unopposed to bring his fever dream to fruition. The Dems will look like clueless impotent imbeciles from the sidelines.
OOH, mommy look what they made me do! Really PP, can't you come up with something better than this toddler BS.
This type of vitriol only tells me Ds know they’ve been played and outmaneuvered.
Trump is using it as an opportunity to do mass layoffs and permanently close whole parts of the federal bureaucracy.![]()
Right. But at what point will Trump actually try to govern the country. Also, when's he going to release those Epstein files?
Oh, he's governing. The fact that you don't like it tells everyone he is.
No, he's actually not. At least not democratically. He hasn't passed a budget. He can't adequately run the executive branch. All he's doing is destroying what he doesn't understand, and that's everything.
The House passed a CR. Democrats didn't go along in the Senate.
Oh well.
That's not the same thing as hashing out a budget based on stated priorities and debating it.
You idiots keep voting for GOP and Dem politicians and then magically expect different results. This is the definition of insanity and stupidity.
This is not a "both sides" thing no matter ho many times you try to post otherwise.
I'm so sick of the "both sides" posters. There are two very distinct sides. On one side we have the regular 99% of American people fighting to cling to some amount of control over their Federal Government. On the other side we have the ultra-wealthy political mega-donors who have gained 99.9% of control over our two corrupt major political parties.
I'm siding with the 99% of regular American people and I say eff you to the lost fools out there who are siding with the mega-donors when they themselves don't have the wealth to buy political influence. Be smarter!!
There are plenty of candidates out there who refuse contributions from mega-donors. You could at least support them.
This isn’t a discussion about elections, past or future. It is a discussion about the current government shutdown. Stay focused.
You are on every post with this both sides whining. No one cares. We have the government we have, and we are still allowed us discuss and debate the actions they are or are not taking.
And we will continue to have the dysfunctional Federal Government we have as long as you short-sighted dupes who fail to get the big picture while dwelling on snapshot in time moments of dysfunction and awfulness. History repeats itself. Learn from it.
Anonymous wrote:It was Democrats that gave him the opportunity, as they didn't authorize funding after September.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So this was all to push Project 2025 further along?
Yeah dummy wrote about this on truth social last night....I'm confused though because MAGA was told and believed that P2025 was all made up-dummy said he didn't even know what P2025 was.....hmmm
News is reporting Trump is meeting with Vought to go over Project 2025 priorities and to eliminate "Democrat Agencies" - and we got condescending chiding, mocking and gaslighting and told we were hyperbolic when correctly said this would happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was Democrats that gave him the opportunity, as they didn't authorize funding after September.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So this was all to push Project 2025 further along?
Yeah dummy wrote about this on truth social last night....I'm confused though because MAGA was told and believed that P2025 was all made up-dummy said he didn't even know what P2025 was.....hmmm
News is reporting Trump is meeting with Vought to go over Project 2025 priorities and to eliminate "Democrat Agencies" - and we got condescending chiding, mocking and gaslighting and told we were hyperbolic when correctly said this would happen.
Trump alone is responsible for Trump's actions. Stop trying to blame the Democrats for everything Trump does. It's illogical.
Anonymous wrote:It was Democrats that gave him the opportunity, as they didn't authorize funding after September.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So this was all to push Project 2025 further along?
Yeah dummy wrote about this on truth social last night....I'm confused though because MAGA was told and believed that P2025 was all made up-dummy said he didn't even know what P2025 was.....hmmm
News is reporting Trump is meeting with Vought to go over Project 2025 priorities and to eliminate "Democrat Agencies" - and we got condescending chiding, mocking and gaslighting and told we were hyperbolic when correctly said this would happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The real idiots here are Schumer and Jeffries who played right into the GOP’s hands by making healthcare subsidies the hill they chose to die on. Now the WH can run roughshod and lay off thousands of more federal workers as Russ Vought works unopposed to bring his fever dream to fruition. The Dems will look like clueless impotent imbeciles from the sidelines.
OOH, mommy look what they made me do! Really PP, can't you come up with something better than this toddler BS.
This type of vitriol only tells me Ds know they’ve been played and outmaneuvered.
Trump is using it as an opportunity to do mass layoffs and permanently close whole parts of the federal bureaucracy.![]()
Right. But at what point will Trump actually try to govern the country. Also, when's he going to release those Epstein files?
Oh, he's governing. The fact that you don't like it tells everyone he is.
No, he's actually not. At least not democratically. He hasn't passed a budget. He can't adequately run the executive branch. All he's doing is destroying what he doesn't understand, and that's everything.
The House passed a CR. Democrats didn't go along in the Senate.
Oh well.
That's not the same thing as hashing out a budget based on stated priorities and debating it.
You idiots keep voting for GOP and Dem politicians and then magically expect different results. This is the definition of insanity and stupidity.
This is not a "both sides" thing no matter ho many times you try to post otherwise.
I'm so sick of the "both sides" posters. There are two very distinct sides. On one side we have the regular 99% of American people fighting to cling to some amount of control over their Federal Government. On the other side we have the ultra-wealthy political mega-donors who have gained 99.9% of control over our two corrupt major political parties.
I'm siding with the 99% of regular American people and I say eff you to the lost fools out there who are siding with the mega-donors when they themselves don't have the wealth to buy political influence. Be smarter!!
There are plenty of candidates out there who refuse contributions from mega-donors. You could at least support them.
There are some but not plenty of national level GOP and Dem politicians out there who aren't mega-donor puppets and I do appreciate those politicians who choose to maintain their integrity over advancing their careers (looking at you AOC). Unfortunately for those politicians, their career ceilings are capped at a low level due to their refusal to play nice with money (looking at you AOC).
AOC? Please list AOC’s accomplishments in Congress. Tell us how many pieces of legislation she has authored and passed into law while in Congress? Give us examples of how effective she is and her hard work for the American people. Please. I want to like her but can’t find many examples of concrete work she has successfully completed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The real idiots here are Schumer and Jeffries who played right into the GOP’s hands by making healthcare subsidies the hill they chose to die on. Now the WH can run roughshod and lay off thousands of more federal workers as Russ Vought works unopposed to bring his fever dream to fruition. The Dems will look like clueless impotent imbeciles from the sidelines.
OOH, mommy look what they made me do! Really PP, can't you come up with something better than this toddler BS.
This type of vitriol only tells me Ds know they’ve been played and outmaneuvered.
Trump is using it as an opportunity to do mass layoffs and permanently close whole parts of the federal bureaucracy.![]()
Right. But at what point will Trump actually try to govern the country. Also, when's he going to release those Epstein files?
Oh, he's governing. The fact that you don't like it tells everyone he is.
No, he's actually not. At least not democratically. He hasn't passed a budget. He can't adequately run the executive branch. All he's doing is destroying what he doesn't understand, and that's everything.
The House passed a CR. Democrats didn't go along in the Senate.
Oh well.
That's not the same thing as hashing out a budget based on stated priorities and debating it.
You idiots keep voting for GOP and Dem politicians and then magically expect different results. This is the definition of insanity and stupidity.
This is not a "both sides" thing no matter ho many times you try to post otherwise.
I'm so sick of the "both sides" posters. There are two very distinct sides. On one side we have the regular 99% of American people fighting to cling to some amount of control over their Federal Government. On the other side we have the ultra-wealthy political mega-donors who have gained 99.9% of control over our two corrupt major political parties.
I'm siding with the 99% of regular American people and I say eff you to the lost fools out there who are siding with the mega-donors when they themselves don't have the wealth to buy political influence. Be smarter!!
There are plenty of candidates out there who refuse contributions from mega-donors. You could at least support them.
There are some but not plenty of national level GOP and Dem politicians out there who aren't mega-donor puppets and I do appreciate those politicians who choose to maintain their integrity over advancing their careers (looking at you AOC). Unfortunately for those politicians, their career ceilings are capped at a low level due to their refusal to play nice with money (looking at you AOC).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The real idiots here are Schumer and Jeffries who played right into the GOP’s hands by making healthcare subsidies the hill they chose to die on. Now the WH can run roughshod and lay off thousands of more federal workers as Russ Vought works unopposed to bring his fever dream to fruition. The Dems will look like clueless impotent imbeciles from the sidelines.
OOH, mommy look what they made me do! Really PP, can't you come up with something better than this toddler BS.
This type of vitriol only tells me Ds know they’ve been played and outmaneuvered.
Trump is using it as an opportunity to do mass layoffs and permanently close whole parts of the federal bureaucracy.![]()
Right. But at what point will Trump actually try to govern the country. Also, when's he going to release those Epstein files?
Oh, he's governing. The fact that you don't like it tells everyone he is.
No, he's actually not. At least not democratically. He hasn't passed a budget. He can't adequately run the executive branch. All he's doing is destroying what he doesn't understand, and that's everything.
The House passed a CR. Democrats didn't go along in the Senate.
Oh well.
That's not the same thing as hashing out a budget based on stated priorities and debating it.
You idiots keep voting for GOP and Dem politicians and then magically expect different results. This is the definition of insanity and stupidity.
This is not a "both sides" thing no matter ho many times you try to post otherwise.
I'm so sick of the "both sides" posters. There are two very distinct sides. On one side we have the regular 99% of American people fighting to cling to some amount of control over their Federal Government. On the other side we have the ultra-wealthy political mega-donors who have gained 99.9% of control over our two corrupt major political parties.
I'm siding with the 99% of regular American people and I say eff you to the lost fools out there who are siding with the mega-donors when they themselves don't have the wealth to buy political influence. Be smarter!!
There are plenty of candidates out there who refuse contributions from mega-donors. You could at least support them.
This isn’t a discussion about elections, past or future. It is a discussion about the current government shutdown. Stay focused.
You are on every post with this both sides whining. No one cares. We have the government we have, and we are still allowed us discuss and debate the actions they are or are not taking.
It was Democrats that gave him the opportunity, as they didn't authorize funding after September.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So this was all to push Project 2025 further along?
Yeah dummy wrote about this on truth social last night....I'm confused though because MAGA was told and believed that P2025 was all made up-dummy said he didn't even know what P2025 was.....hmmm
News is reporting Trump is meeting with Vought to go over Project 2025 priorities and to eliminate "Democrat Agencies" - and we got condescending chiding, mocking and gaslighting and told we were hyperbolic when correctly said this would happen.