Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More immigration
Expanding H1B
Expanding OPT to more job classifications
100% focus on replacing US citizens with cheap foreign labor
I think that we should accept one immigrant for every maga that we can deport.
Contempt
One of the main things that I hear from my fellow tradesmen is how the elite and white-collar professional class don't care about or respect the blue collar working class. This disrespect comes out in many ways, big and small. But you can hear it a lot in the political rhetoric coming out of the progressive side these days. It was there in the COVID conversation, how work-from-home white collar folks pushed for endless lockdowns and vaccine mandates, to be imposed on the working class whose labor they relied on to stay home. It's there in the way they talk about a universal basic income instead of high-paying trade jobs, and in the way they push for low-wage green jobs instead of union energy jobs.
But you can really see it in how they talk about college. Take the latest issue that progressives are pushing the Biden administration on—student loan cancelation. They want us taxpayers to pay off the student loans of the college educated, who on average make more money than those without a degree, and for whom the economy recovered almost immediately post-COVID. Then they have the audacity to tell us that it will help blue collar workers. They want us to enthusiastically agree to pay off their student loan debt, and then have the nerve to tell us it's in our interest as Americans.
That's what I mean about disrespect. And it pervades the entire conversation about college in America today.
https://www.newsweek.com/divide-isnt-right-v-left-its-us-blue-collar-workers-fighting-elite-contempt-opinion-1706053
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More immigration
Expanding H1B
Expanding OPT to more job classifications
100% focus on replacing US citizens with cheap foreign labor
I think that we should accept one immigrant for every maga that we can deport.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anal sex
Too late, that one's already been taken by the GOP.
There are already numerous instances detailed in the various "GOP Scandals" threads and indeed many involve anal sex. The PP may have been trying to make a crude sniping joke about Dems but it's one that backfires on Republicans every single time.
+1. I agree.
It’s also highly out-dated as an insult. Historically, homophobia in the U.S. has tended to be directed more at the male population. That’s not to say there was or is full acceptance of women who are lesbian or bi (or who identify elsewhere under the LGTBQIA+ umbrella). No, there is work still to be done.
But that being said, in the U.S., there has just not been as much societal opposition to gay women’s relationships. In part this is due to women generally being simply more discreet in their affairs and lifestyles.
Indeed, women have historically been accepted as “roommates,” without much intrigue in the U.S.; and many female roommates are simply that: plutonic roommates.
But suspicion is unleashed on two or more single men who are in long term roommate situations. And this all relates back to the unfair assumption men may be engaging in anal intercourse with one another; when in fact: not every even overtly gay couple (including men married to men), necessarily engage in anal lovemaking.
But even those men who do have anal intercourse with other men should never be shamed for how they love. It’s private! The state and private actors should stay out of it.
This is indeed an issue the entire party should get behind (if you’ll excuse the pun).
Women weren't spreading monkeypox everywhere either. You should look up where it was being spread before the story magically dropped out of the news.
The GOP and proud boy gatherings?
Mike Johnson’s house? Lindsay Graham’s massage parlour?
Is there a monkeypox filter on Grindr?
That that there is anything wrong with it, it’s 2025. Just don’t be a hypocrite about it, maga.
First:
STOP SAYING “monkeypox” !!!
It’s extremely racist to say that.
The correct term is mpox.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More immigration
Expanding H1B
Expanding OPT to more job classifications
100% focus on replacing US citizens with cheap foreign labor
I think that we should accept one immigrant for every maga that we can deport.
Anonymous wrote:More immigration
Expanding H1B
Expanding OPT to more job classifications
100% focus on replacing US citizens with cheap foreign labor
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anal sex
Too late, that one's already been taken by the GOP.
There are already numerous instances detailed in the various "GOP Scandals" threads and indeed many involve anal sex. The PP may have been trying to make a crude sniping joke about Dems but it's one that backfires on Republicans every single time.
+1. I agree.
It’s also highly out-dated as an insult. Historically, homophobia in the U.S. has tended to be directed more at the male population. That’s not to say there was or is full acceptance of women who are lesbian or bi (or who identify elsewhere under the LGTBQIA+ umbrella). No, there is work still to be done.
But that being said, in the U.S., there has just not been as much societal opposition to gay women’s relationships. In part this is due to women generally being simply more discreet in their affairs and lifestyles.
Indeed, women have historically been accepted as “roommates,” without much intrigue in the U.S.; and many female roommates are simply that: plutonic roommates.
But suspicion is unleashed on two or more single men who are in long term roommate situations. And this all relates back to the unfair assumption men may be engaging in anal intercourse with one another; when in fact: not every even overtly gay couple (including men married to men), necessarily engage in anal lovemaking.
But even those men who do have anal intercourse with other men should never be shamed for how they love. It’s private! The state and private actors should stay out of it.
This is indeed an issue the entire party should get behind (if you’ll excuse the pun).
Women weren't spreading monkeypox everywhere either. You should look up where it was being spread before the story magically dropped out of the news.
The GOP and proud boy gatherings?
Mike Johnson’s house? Lindsay Graham’s massage parlour?
Is there a monkeypox filter on Grindr?
That that there is anything wrong with it, it’s 2025. Just don’t be a hypocrite about it, maga.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anal sex
Too late, that one's already been taken by the GOP.
There are already numerous instances detailed in the various "GOP Scandals" threads and indeed many involve anal sex. The PP may have been trying to make a crude sniping joke about Dems but it's one that backfires on Republicans every single time.
+1. I agree.
It’s also highly out-dated as an insult. Historically, homophobia in the U.S. has tended to be directed more at the male population. That’s not to say there was or is full acceptance of women who are lesbian or bi (or who identify elsewhere under the LGTBQIA+ umbrella). No, there is work still to be done.
But that being said, in the U.S., there has just not been as much societal opposition to gay women’s relationships. In part this is due to women generally being simply more discreet in their affairs and lifestyles.
Indeed, women have historically been accepted as “roommates,” without much intrigue in the U.S.; and many female roommates are simply that: plutonic roommates.
But suspicion is unleashed on two or more single men who are in long term roommate situations. And this all relates back to the unfair assumption men may be engaging in anal intercourse with one another; when in fact: not every even overtly gay couple (including men married to men), necessarily engage in anal lovemaking.
But even those men who do have anal intercourse with other men should never be shamed for how they love. It’s private! The state and private actors should stay out of it.
This is indeed an issue the entire party should get behind (if you’ll excuse the pun).
Women weren't spreading monkeypox everywhere either. You should look up where it was being spread before the story magically dropped out of the news.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What will the Republicans stand for in 2026?
This is what I see as the GOP Platform in 2026:
Erosion of Democracy and Authoritarian Drift
Undermining elections, empowering autocrats, and dismantling democratic norms — the GOP has embraced power over principle.
Weaponizing Government Against Political Opponents
From threats to prosecute rivals to purging civil servants, Republicans are turning the state into a partisan weapon.
Attacks on Reproductive Rights
The party has led the rollback of abortion access and bodily autonomy, even in cases of rape or medical emergency.
Promotion of Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation
From QAnon to COVID to election denial, the GOP has become a breeding ground for dangerous falsehoods.
Undermining Press Freedom
Labeling journalists as “enemies of the people” and spreading disinformation to discredit factual reporting.
Climate Denial and Environmental Rollbacks
Blocking clean energy, gutting environmental protections from known carcinogens and harmful pollution, and denying science while the planet burns.
Suppression of Voting Rights
Gerrymandering, voter ID laws, and purges designed to silence opposition and rig outcomes.
Fiscal Hypocrisy and Exploding Deficits
Trillions added to the debt while claiming to be fiscally responsible — all to fund tax cuts for the rich.
Corporate Welfare and Tax Breaks for Billionaires
Massive giveaways to the ultra-wealthy while working families get crumbs and broken promises.
Encouraging Political Violence and Failing to Condemn It
From January 6 to threats against officials, silence or complicity has become the norm.
Cuts to Social Safety Nets
Slashing Medicaid, food aid, and disability support while claiming to defend “real Americans.”
Denial, Attack and Disregard for Scientific Expertise and Public Health
COVID denial, anti-vaccine rhetoric, and rejection of basic science have endangered lives.
Undermining Public Education and Promoting Censorship
Book bans, attacks on teachers, and politicized curricula threaten intellectual freedom.
Cult-Like Loyalty to Individual Leaders
Loyalty to Trump overrides law, ethics, and even longstanding conservative principles.
Sexual Misconduct and Exploitation
Repeated scandals involving underage women and failure to hold perpetrators accountable.
Isolationist Foreign Policy
Abandoning and maligning allies and cozying up to dictators weakens America’s global standing.
Masked Goon Squads
Using anonymous force against civilians during protests — a chilling abuse of power.
Destroying Consumer Safety and Financial Protections
Deregulation has left Americans vulnerable to scams, unsafe products, and corporate abuse.
Inflation Without Relief
Policies that worsen inflation while blocking efforts to ease the burden on working families.
I'm not wrong on any of these...
I will take all of these over losing my job because of Democrats immigration policies
Hierarchy of needs
I need to work to support my family.
So you are a day laborer or picking vegetables and fruit in hot weather? No undocumented immigrant has been in competition for your job. In fact, you probably hired illegals to take care of your brats and clear you pig sty house. You are a fool.
This is a remarkably short-sighted and simplistic perspective. Initial illegals may be unskilled laborers and others in menial employment roles. Their children benefit from taxpayer funded education and social welfare support; many go on to become better educated, and consequently competitive for jobs requiring more language and other skills. At that point, those 2nd gen illegals are beginning to compete with legal immigrants and with citizens. The laws of supply and demand dictate inexorably that as the supply of better skilled workers increased, regardless of immigration status, competition among them for jobs will increase, depressing wages. Eliminating illegal workers results in a smaller workforce, and less competition for employment. Employers seeking employees have to become more attractive in order to compete successfully. Econ 101.
What are “2nd gen illegals”? From where I come, they’re called citizens.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anal sex
Too late, that one's already been taken by the GOP.
There are already numerous instances detailed in the various "GOP Scandals" threads and indeed many involve anal sex. The PP may have been trying to make a crude sniping joke about Dems but it's one that backfires on Republicans every single time.
+1. I agree.
It’s also highly out-dated as an insult. Historically, homophobia in the U.S. has tended to be directed more at the male population. That’s not to say there was or is full acceptance of women who are lesbian or bi (or who identify elsewhere under the LGTBQIA+ umbrella). No, there is work still to be done.
But that being said, in the U.S., there has just not been as much societal opposition to gay women’s relationships. In part this is due to women generally being simply more discreet in their affairs and lifestyles.
Indeed, women have historically been accepted as “roommates,” without much intrigue in the U.S.; and many female roommates are simply that: plutonic roommates.
But suspicion is unleashed on two or more single men who are in long term roommate situations. And this all relates back to the unfair assumption men may be engaging in anal intercourse with one another; when in fact: not every even overtly gay couple (including men married to men), necessarily engage in anal lovemaking.
But even those men who do have anal intercourse with other men should never be shamed for how they love. It’s private! The state and private actors should stay out of it.
This is indeed an issue the entire party should get behind (if you’ll excuse the pun).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anal sex
Too late, that one's already been taken by the GOP.
There are already numerous instances detailed in the various "GOP Scandals" threads and indeed many involve anal sex. The PP may have been trying to make a crude sniping joke about Dems but it's one that backfires on Republicans every single time.