Anonymous wrote:I will pay you to stop copying and pasting this.Anonymous wrote:A friendly PSA reminder----
https://www.facebook.com/...tid=K35XfP
I copied this from the above link. It is a very healthy approach.
Only a measly 3% of high school lacrosse players actually make it to play Division 1 in college. Seriously, let that sink in before you start tearing apart a family's choice or a player's decision to attend a particular school!
“You have to remember that everyone is coming from a different spot. Some folks will use the recruiting process to get into the best academic school possible, regardless of the money involved. For others, the main focus is lowering the cost of college as much as possible. Some families are focused on playing for the "best" lacrosse program they can play for. All these decisions are fine as long as they meet the family's needs.
Trying to put your priorities onto other families' choices just doesn't make sense since everyone is coming from a slightly different place.”
A lot of this forum is stupid, but the idea that players on any teams are monoliths in their choices is near the top. And that goes both ways in this discussion. I think there are probably fine people on both sides, but I'm not 100% sure.Anonymous wrote:It’s funny that people think all one should say on this forum is congratulations. That’s not real life and in real life most people have strong opinions about colleges. Even more so in this town.
For many Capital families, unlike families in less affluent places, lacrosse is great fun but is mostly a means to an ends which is getting into a better college than would otherwise be possible. That can be a college with a general acceptance rate of under 20-25% or maybe under 10%.
It’s pretty disingenuous to pretend that no one around here is going to question why a Capital lax player is committing to a college that doesn’t meet that criteria, especially on an anonymous forum - just not realistic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stop being purposely dense and telling people to wish them a congratulations. That’s not what this board is for. You want us all to come on here and just say YAYYYY!!?? You know that’s useless. And to be on an anonymous board asking people to do that is truly ridiculous. And you are doing it on purpose to be annoying.
What IS useful is to have an honest discussion about what parents can learn from these examples. That is the point of this thread. Obviously it’s disappointing for a capital blue player to go to school with an 80 percent acceptance rate. So what happened? What can we learn? Are girls being unrealistic and not focusing on the right schools? Did cap recruiting guide them correctly? School coaches? What strategy tips can we learn?
Somewhat in line with this thinking, after reading the Cap Blue list, I thought none of these schools are very good at lacrosse? High academic- ABSOLUTELY. Only a few schools in the list are decent at lacrosse? It must be the goal for many to play at Ivy’s regardless of lacrosse.
Check out the M&D recruits for the top lacrosse schools.
Anonymous wrote:Many schools are ranked higher at lacrosse because they compete in easier leagues, such as the MAAC, CAA, and Patriot. Therefore, the rankings can be somewhat skewed, as these leagues are weaker than others; this is especially true on the boys' side as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stop being purposely dense and telling people to wish them a congratulations. That’s not what this board is for. You want us all to come on here and just say YAYYYY!!?? You know that’s useless. And to be on an anonymous board asking people to do that is truly ridiculous. And you are doing it on purpose to be annoying.
What IS useful is to have an honest discussion about what parents can learn from these examples. That is the point of this thread. Obviously it’s disappointing for a capital blue player to go to school with an 80 percent acceptance rate. So what happened? What can we learn? Are girls being unrealistic and not focusing on the right schools? Did cap recruiting guide them correctly? School coaches? What strategy tips can we learn?
Somewhat in line with this thinking, after reading the Cap Blue list, I thought none of these schools are very good at lacrosse? High academic- ABSOLUTELY. Only a few schools in the list are decent at lacrosse? It must be the goal for many to play at Ivy’s regardless of lacrosse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stop being purposely dense and telling people to wish them a congratulations. That’s not what this board is for. You want us all to come on here and just say YAYYYY!!?? You know that’s useless. And to be on an anonymous board asking people to do that is truly ridiculous. And you are doing it on purpose to be annoying.
What IS useful is to have an honest discussion about what parents can learn from these examples. That is the point of this thread. Obviously it’s disappointing for a capital blue player to go to school with an 80 percent acceptance rate. So what happened? What can we learn? Are girls being unrealistic and not focusing on the right schools? Did cap recruiting guide them correctly? School coaches? What strategy tips can we learn?
Somewhat in line with this thinking, after reading the Cap Blue list, I thought none of these schools are very good at lacrosse? High academic- ABSOLUTELY. Only a few schools in the list are decent at lacrosse? It must be the goal for many to play at Ivy’s regardless of lacrosse.
Anonymous wrote:Stop being purposely dense and telling people to wish them a congratulations. That’s not what this board is for. You want us all to come on here and just say YAYYYY!!?? You know that’s useless. And to be on an anonymous board asking people to do that is truly ridiculous. And you are doing it on purpose to be annoying.
What IS useful is to have an honest discussion about what parents can learn from these examples. That is the point of this thread. Obviously it’s disappointing for a capital blue player to go to school with an 80 percent acceptance rate. So what happened? What can we learn? Are girls being unrealistic and not focusing on the right schools? Did cap recruiting guide them correctly? School coaches? What strategy tips can we learn?
Anonymous wrote:While I agree with most of what is said above, I do not agree that we cannot have the conversation right here. This forum is known to veer off the topic quite often. I don’t see any issue in discussing what people think may have gone right or wrong in their journey. I do think People with younger kids are reading this and look forward to hearing as much as they can about everybody’s experience.
I will pay you to stop copying and pasting this.Anonymous wrote:A friendly PSA reminder----
https://www.facebook.com/...tid=K35XfP
I copied this from the above link. It is a very healthy approach.
Only a measly 3% of high school lacrosse players actually make it to play Division 1 in college. Seriously, let that sink in before you start tearing apart a family's choice or a player's decision to attend a particular school!
“You have to remember that everyone is coming from a different spot. Some folks will use the recruiting process to get into the best academic school possible, regardless of the money involved. For others, the main focus is lowering the cost of college as much as possible. Some families are focused on playing for the "best" lacrosse program they can play for. All these decisions are fine as long as they meet the family's needs.
Trying to put your priorities onto other families' choices just doesn't make sense since everyone is coming from a slightly different place.”