Big week coming up.
Tuesday - SSAA / SR & Visi / Potomac
Thursday - BI / Visi
Friday - PVI / GC

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GC over SR today. GC with the stall for 8 minutes and scored with 1 second left.

GC has no class.

SR actually got the ball back during that stall but couldn't score so GC didn't stall the whole 8min. SR had their chance but blew it. Maybe SR parents should spend less time heckling the other team.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Visi should not have won it by much more. SJC played them tough. Both teams had sloppy play at times. As someone at the game, there were more comments on the sideline on how hard fought the game was between both teams. Why can’t SJC just be a solid team that took the mighty Visi into OT. I understand this chat comments on them having no depth, but give it a rest.

Problem is that SJC has some depth, but never uses it and have lost many close games this year because of it. Will unfortunately continue to be their downfall.

The lack of playing anyone beyond the starters will haunt SJC the next couple of years. She has done nothing to develop any talent behind the 24s the 25 class has 1 commit so far to a d3 all be it a good d3.

Hey "disgruntled parent of a sophomore at SJC who is not currently getting PT on Varsity", we get the point. You make it after every game win or lose. Coach seems to be managing a pretty decent season from what I've seen.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GC over SR today. GC with the stall for 8 minutes and scored with 1 second left.

GC has no class.

SR did that last year in close games. Good for GC.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Visi should not have won it by much more. SJC played them tough. Both teams had sloppy play at times. As someone at the game, there were more comments on the sideline on how hard fought the game was between both teams. Why can’t SJC just be a solid team that took the mighty Visi into OT. I understand this chat comments on them having no depth, but give it a rest.

I disagree with this . Visi and sjc both have good players but Visi fell lost its way the second half. Visi won’t reach its full potential until they better control the midi line and open up the offense.

^What does this even mean?

It means
A. visi played poorly in the second half and the game was closer than it should
have been.

B. That visi does not use its entire offense because the sisters and the other midi do whatever they want. Zero play from the x, very little passing in the transition, and zero use of the attack line. Until they straighten this out outcomes will be below potential.

Agree.

Stop middies at Visi. Stop Visi..Simple if you can do it.

Teams that run offense through only a few top players will never beat teams run their offense through the entire team. A number of teams fall into this category.

Like Northwestern you mean? Scane and Taylor had six goals apiece in yesterday's win over Md.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Visi should not have won it by much more. SJC played them tough. Both teams had sloppy play at times. As someone at the game, there were more comments on the sideline on how hard fought the game was between both teams. Why can’t SJC just be a solid team that took the mighty Visi into OT. I understand this chat comments on them having no depth, but give it a rest.

I disagree with this . Visi and sjc both have good players but Visi fell lost its way the second half. Visi won’t reach its full potential until they better control the midi line and open up the offense.

^What does this even mean?

It means
A. visi played poorly in the second half and the game was closer than it should
have been.

B. That visi does not use its entire offense because the sisters and the other midi do whatever they want. Zero play from the x, very little passing in the transition, and zero use of the attack line. Until they straighten this out outcomes will be below potential.

^ shows you don't watch that many Visi games then, for fairly obvious reasons if you watched any games.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GC over SR today. GC with the stall for 8 minutes and scored with 1 second left.

GC has no class.

Maybe not but they’re undefeated

Anonymous wrote:GC over SR today. GC with the stall for 8 minutes and scored with 1 second left.

GC has no class.

Anonymous wrote:3 seconds rule also changed this year to a stick and an arm's length away not just a stick's length away. Some refs don't seem to have gotten that memo.

When there are so many college games happening it's harder to get decent refs since most are at the college level.

The only change to the 3 second rule in NFHS had to do with administering the penalty on calls outside the CSE and below the GLE it now goes to the closets dot.

“ 10-1y – Three Seconds PENALTIES: Clarifies free position locations for three-second violations and requires a free position to be awarded at the closest dot for a three-second violation when the spot of the ball is outside the critical scoring area and below the goal line extended.”

https://www.nfhs.org/sports-resource-content/girls-lacrosse-rules-changes-2024/

SJC Loyola score?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Visi should not have won it by much more. SJC played them tough. Both teams had sloppy play at times. As someone at the game, there were more comments on the sideline on how hard fought the game was between both teams. Why can’t SJC just be a solid team that took the mighty Visi into OT. I understand this chat comments on them having no depth, but give it a rest.

I disagree with this . Visi and sjc both have good players but Visi fell lost its way the second half. Visi won’t reach its full potential until they better control the midi line and open up the offense.

^What does this even mean?

It means
A. visi played poorly in the second half and the game was closer than it should
have been.

B. That visi does not use its entire offense because the sisters and the other midi do whatever they want. Zero play from the x, very little passing in the transition, and zero use of the attack line. Until they straighten this out outcomes will be below potential.

Agree.

Stop middies at Visi. Stop Visi..Simple if you can do it.

Teams that run offense through only a few top players will never beat teams run their offense through the entire team. A number of teams fall into this category.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Visi should not have won it by much more. SJC played them tough. Both teams had sloppy play at times. As someone at the game, there were more comments on the sideline on how hard fought the game was between both teams. Why can’t SJC just be a solid team that took the mighty Visi into OT. I understand this chat comments on them having no depth, but give it a rest.

I disagree with this . Visi and sjc both have good players but Visi fell lost its way the second half. Visi won’t reach its full potential until they better control the midi line and open up the offense.

^What does this even mean?

It means
A. visi played poorly in the second half and the game was closer than it should
have been.

B. That visi does not use its entire offense because the sisters and the other midi do whatever they want. Zero play from the x, very little passing in the transition, and zero use of the attack line. Until they straighten this out outcomes will be below potential.

Agree.

Stop middies at Visi. Stop Visi..Simple if you can do it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Visi should not have won it by much more. SJC played them tough. Both teams had sloppy play at times. As someone at the game, there were more comments on the sideline on how hard fought the game was between both teams. Why can’t SJC just be a solid team that took the mighty Visi into OT. I understand this chat comments on them having no depth, but give it a rest.

I disagree with this . Visi and sjc both have good players but Visi fell lost its way the second half. Visi won’t reach its full potential until they better control the midi line and open up the offense.

^What does this even mean?

It means
A. visi played poorly in the second half and the game was closer than it should
have been.

B. That visi does not use its entire offense because the sisters and the other midi do whatever they want. Zero play from the x, very little passing in the transition, and zero use of the attack line. Until they straighten this out outcomes will be below potential.

I think anyone who thinks that THEY know all the rules better than a person who actually referees multiple times a week is delusional.

A lot of refs are terrible because of lack motivation or because they let their emotions dictate how they call the game. But I’m positive they still know the rules better than the parents on the sidelines.

3 seconds rule also changed this year to a stick and an arm's length away not just a stick's length away. Some refs don't seem to have gotten that memo.

When there are so many college games happening it's harder to get decent refs since most are at the college level.