Anonymous
06/29/2022 20:09
Subject: Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who did she go to work for after Mark Meadows?
She doesn’t have a job right now, as has been mentioned in this thread several times.
Man just think Fox News could have hired her for 450k a year and none of this would have be exposed. Short sited on Fox News part.
She’s been unemployed for over a year?
She's apparently THAT good
She has the stench of Trump and Meadows and Cruz and Scalise on her resume.
Well, her latest performance guarantees her any job she wants - for Radical Democrats. Just watch.
But it’s curious why she was unemployed for 18 months. Perhaps she moved back in with her parents.
I would guess pandemic plus burnout plus trauma. She worked 10 to 12 hour days during all of 2020 for a bunch of lunatics and when it was over she should be disillusioned about a career in politics. She needed a break. She’s 25 and she’s worked at the White House. What job isn’t a step down?
Now she’s shown that she’s too honest to be hired by a Republican but too tainted by Trump, Meadows, et al to be hired by a Democrat. She should go to law school or grad school and move on from the shitty world of politics.
Anonymous
06/29/2022 20:08
Subject: Re:Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond
Anonymous wrote:
The Jan. 6 committee didn’t reach out to the Secret Service in the days before it aired explosive testimony about an alleged physical altercation between Donald Trump and his security detail on the day of the riot, according to an agency spokesperson.
Anthony Guglielmi, the service’s chief of communications, told POLITICO that select committee investigators did not ask Secret Service personnel to reappear or answer questions in writing in the 10 days before asking Hutchinson about the matter at the hearing.
“[W]e were not asked to reappear before the Committee in response to yesterday’s new information and we plan on formally responding on the record,” he wrote in an email. “We have and will continue to make any member of the Secret Service available.”
The Secret Service statement comes amid questions about two aspects of Hutchinson’s testimony: the story about Trump’s behavior in his presidential vehicle, which Hutchinson said was relayed to her by top White House security aide Tony Ornato; and her claim to have written a note about a potential Trump statement that would’ve aimed to quell the Jan. 6 violence.
And the committee’s lack of outreach in the days before Hutchinson’s hearing is notable because the Secret Service has said Jan. 6 investigators can access any documents or witnesses they deem relevant.
Well. She was receiving threats. So. Maybe the committee didn’t want anyone to know. Pretty obvious why they wouldn’t tell the SS what was coming.
Anonymous
06/29/2022 20:02
Subject: Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond
Cassidy should simply say she never applied for work at Mar-a-Lago. IF it’s true, of course!
Anonymous
06/29/2022 20:01
Subject: Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond
Anonymous wrote:I just can’t believe Cassidy has been unemployed for 18 mos. Something fishy about that. Any evidence out there?
can anyone provide a link to a credible source that says she's been unemployed for 18 months? I haven't found anything.
Anonymous
06/29/2022 20:00
Subject: Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond
Meadows really came out as both ineffective and a horrible person. The worst possible Chief of Staff for Trump. Shirking the responsibilities of his position, hiding from bad news so others had to break it to Trump and experience his rage, not showing any interest in doing anything except scrolling his phone and talking with his buddy Jim Jordan.
Anonymous
06/29/2022 19:57
Subject: Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond
Anonymous wrote:News Flash:
Ms Hutchinson wanted to become “permanent staff” at Mar-a-Lago, but that never happened, according to CNN.
Well, well, well. Sounds like she has an ax to grind.
Trump said this but he also said that he didn't know her. So he refused to take her because he didn't know her? See, it makes no sense.
Anonymous
06/29/2022 19:55
Subject: Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond
Anonymous wrote:News Flash:
Ms Hutchinson wanted to become “permanent staff” at Mar-a-Lago, but that never happened, according to CNN.
Well, well, well. Sounds like she has an ax to grind.
That’s ALWAYS what trump says and he’s been using the same sad defense for decades. You’d have to be a fool to believe that again.
Anonymous
06/29/2022 19:53
Subject: Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond
Anonymous wrote:News Flash:
Ms Hutchinson wanted to become “permanent staff” at Mar-a-Lago, but that never happened, according to CNN.
Well, well, well. Sounds like she has an ax to grind.
That is NOT according to CNN, you idiot! How would they know?! CNN is reporting what trump wrote on his social media tweeter thing.
Anonymous
06/29/2022 19:52
Subject: Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond
Anonymous wrote:News Flash:
Ms Hutchinson wanted to become “permanent staff” at Mar-a-Lago, but that never happened, according to CNN.
Well, well, well. Sounds like she has an ax to grind.
Wasn’t that what Trump said yesterday? I can’t say that I’d trust his word.
Anonymous
06/29/2022 19:52
Subject: Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond
Anonymous wrote:News Flash:
Ms Hutchinson wanted to become “permanent staff” at Mar-a-Lago, but that never happened, according to CNN.
Well, well, well. Sounds like she has an ax to grind.
"According to CNN" in the sense that CNN reported Trump's rant about how he hardly knew her but personally rejected her for Mar-a-Lago. Believe what you will.
Anonymous
06/29/2022 19:50
Subject: Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who did she go to work for after Mark Meadows?
She doesn’t have a job right now, as has been mentioned in this thread several times.
Man just think Fox News could have hired her for 450k a year and none of this would have be exposed. Short sited on Fox News part.
She’s been unemployed for over a year?
She's apparently THAT good
She has the stench of Trump and Meadows and Cruz and Scalise on her resume.
Well, her latest performance guarantees her any job she wants - for Radical Democrats. Just watch.
But it’s curious why she was unemployed for 18 months. Perhaps she moved back in with her parents.
She'll be an MSNBC contributor in no time. They will promote her as the "conservative" to "balance" their far left hosts and guest. LOL.
Anonymous
06/29/2022 19:49
Subject: Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who did she go to work for after Mark Meadows?
She doesn’t have a job right now, as has been mentioned in this thread several times.
Man just think Fox News could have hired her for 450k a year and none of this would have be exposed. Short sited on Fox News part.
She’s been unemployed for over a year?
She's apparently THAT good
She has the stench of Trump and Meadows and Cruz and Scalise on her resume.
Well, her latest performance guarantees her any job she wants - for Radical Democrats. Just watch.
But it’s curious why she was unemployed for 18 months. Perhaps she moved back in with her parents.
I would guess pandemic plus burnout plus trauma. She worked 10 to 12 hour days during all of 2020 for a bunch of lunatics and when it was over she should be disillusioned about a career in politics. She needed a break. She’s 25 and she’s worked at the White House. What job isn’t a step down?
Anonymous
06/29/2022 19:49
Subject: Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond
News Flash:
Ms Hutchinson wanted to become “permanent staff” at Mar-a-Lago, but that never happened, according to CNN.
Well, well, well. Sounds like she has an ax to grind.
Ms Hutchinson wanted to become “permanent staff” at Mar-a-Lago, but that never happened, according to CNN.
Well, well, well. Sounds like she has an ax to grind.
Anonymous
06/29/2022 19:46
Subject: Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To recap:
Trump knew large numbers of people in the crowd were armed—or auto told Meadows and Hutchinson.
Trump wanted the armed crowd to move toward the Capitol and “stop the steal”.
The VP and the Speaker were at the Capitol.
Trump knew there were threats against the VP and didn’t ask supporters to be peaceful and stay away from the Capitol—he encouraged them to go there and fight, naming the VP as someone who didn’t do what needed to be done to stop the election.
The violent crowd within 40 ft of the VP.
If he had been killed, I would say Trump could be tried for felony murder. Luckily the VP wasn’t killed. It was “just” a failed coup.
You forgot the part where Trump asked for additional forces and was turned down.
Imagine that. Nancy adamantly refused the National Guard on standby. Why??
Jesus Christ, we’ve talked about this for a year and a half. Nancy Pelosi is not in charge of the national guard. Neither is Muriel Bowser, since that’s probably your next ancient argument.
Actually, both Bowser and Pelosi said they did NOT want the National Guard, which Trump had authorized.
Not true. Stop lying. This has been debunked a hundred times on here but you dupes are hopeless.
Google is your friend.
Truth should be yours. YouTube is not a credible fact checking source.
Anonymous
06/29/2022 19:45
Subject: Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just can’t believe Cassidy has been unemployed for 18 mos. Something fishy about that. Any evidence out there?
She's a Trumper who got fired. Who on earth would hire her?
She’ll get hired after she finished her book. I wouldn’t worry about her.