Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:US v. Rahimi decision was a good decision and upheld a common sense gun law.
Finally SCOTUS did something to tell “shall not be infringed” to shove it up their @ss.
Anonymous wrote:US v. Rahimi decision was a good decision and upheld a common sense gun law.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sadly, there will never be common sense gum laws and this was confirmed with all the children murdered at Sandy Hook. Our legislators care more about the NRA and votes from red necks than they care about children.
You just had a common sense law upheld.
Thank goodness but the Bump Stock was not upheld.
Supreme Court Ruling on Bump Stocks Could Open Door to More Lethal Weapons https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/19/us/bump-stocks-supreme-court-guns.html?smid=nytcore-android-share
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sadly, there will never be common sense gum laws and this was confirmed with all the children murdered at Sandy Hook. Our legislators care more about the NRA and votes from red necks than they care about children.
You just had a common sense law upheld.
Anonymous wrote:Sadly, there will never be common sense gum laws and this was confirmed with all the children murdered at Sandy Hook. Our legislators care more about the NRA and votes from red necks than they care about children.
Anonymous wrote:SCOTUS has upheld a law barring domestic abusers from owning guns. Lots of opinions but only Thomas dissented.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-upholds-domestic-violence-gun-restriction-rcna137782
The plaintiff is a scumbag btw.
“Rahimi’s ex-partner, with whom he shares a child, obtained a restraining order after an incident in an Arlington, Texas, parking lot in 2019. Rahimi allegedly knocked the woman to the ground, dragged her to his car and pushed her inside, causing her to knock her head on the dashboard, prosecutors said in court papers. He also allegedly fired a shot from his gun in the direction of a witness.
Even while the protective order was in place, Rahimi was implicated in a series of shootings, including one in which he allegedly fired bullets into a house using an AR-15 rifle, prosecutors allege.
Rahimi faces state charges in the domestic assault and a separate assault against a different woman. But the case before the justices concerns his separate prosecution by the Justice Department for violating the federal gun possession law.”
Anonymous wrote:This is good.
Anonymous wrote:What?!! lolAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guns aren't the problem. There are many places in the US where people have lots of guns with low crime rates.
The problem are criminals commit crimes at obscene rates. Lock up the criminals and watch crime drop. It's so simple everyone smarter than Fox Butterfield can understand.
And how do you handle the mentally ill slaughtering classrooms of children? Six year-olds watching their friends explode while waiting for their turn?
*crickets*
Gun lovers love to say "we don't have a gun problem, we have a mental health problem" yet when you then press them to deal with the mental health problem they slink out of the room. Or, "guns don't kill people, people kill people" yet when you want to make it harder for the people who kill people to get guns they start whining.
Bring back the mental hospitals.
Absolutely. So many angry men in pick up trucks these days. Hair trigger road rage. They belong in an institution for their anger issues.
What?!! lolAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guns aren't the problem. There are many places in the US where people have lots of guns with low crime rates.
The problem are criminals commit crimes at obscene rates. Lock up the criminals and watch crime drop. It's so simple everyone smarter than Fox Butterfield can understand.
And how do you handle the mentally ill slaughtering classrooms of children? Six year-olds watching their friends explode while waiting for their turn?
*crickets*
Gun lovers love to say "we don't have a gun problem, we have a mental health problem" yet when you then press them to deal with the mental health problem they slink out of the room. Or, "guns don't kill people, people kill people" yet when you want to make it harder for the people who kill people to get guns they start whining.
Bring back the mental hospitals.
Absolutely. So many angry men in pick up trucks these days. Hair trigger road rage. They belong in an institution for their anger issues.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guns aren't the problem. There are many places in the US where people have lots of guns with low crime rates.
The problem are criminals commit crimes at obscene rates. Lock up the criminals and watch crime drop. It's so simple everyone smarter than Fox Butterfield can understand.
Agree.
It’s nearly impossible to legally own a gun in DC. You cannot even buy a gun in DC; there are ZERO stores. Yet there were nearly 1,000 violent carjackings and plenty of violence (including that committed with illegally-owned guns) in DC.
What DC refuses to do is enforce its own laws or prosecute anyone for any crime - even violent crime.
DC’s laws are so dystopian that anyone age 26 and under is legally a “youthful offender” subject to, at most, probation, and released same-day to the custody of his parents (wait - there are no parents), even when the “youthful offender murders or maims someone.
All because supposedly “26 year olds and under have brains which are not fully developed” (so George Allen claims), but at the same time, DC thinks the voting age should be lowered to 16.
Sorry DC, your laws are devoid of logic and make no sense.