Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still wrong. Redshirting is done by insecure parents to ensure their son has an advantage on the kids in the traditional age spectrum.
Said the idiot.
I think not. I am sure there are examples of redshirting done for legitimate reasons. EVERY parent I know who redshirted his child, however, did it be he wants his kid to be the oldest so they can shine academically, athlectically or socially compared to a younger peer group. It must feel great to know your 7 year old is the leader of of a class of 6 year olds. Bravo!
Anonymous wrote:Teachers can't help but base their assessments of students on the students they have in their classes. As the male students have averaged older and older, the assessments of the "in grade" children have been impacted. So what you do with your snowflake does impact the other snowflakes. So no, redshirting isn't cost free.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still wrong. Redshirting is done by insecure parents to ensure their son has an advantage on the kids in the traditional age spectrum.
Said the idiot.
I think not. I am sure there are examples of redshirting done for legitimate reasons. EVERY parent I know who redshirted his child, however, did it be he wants his kid to be the oldest so they can shine academically, athlectically or socially compared to a younger peer group. It must feel great to know your 7 year old is the leader of of a class of 6 year olds. Bravo!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still wrong. Redshirting is done by insecure parents to ensure their son has an advantage on the kids in the traditional age spectrum.
Said the idiot.
Anonymous wrote:Teachers can't help but base their assessments of students on the students they have in their classes. As the male students have averaged older and older, the assessments of the "in grade" children have been impacted. So what you do with your snowflake does impact the other snowflakes. So no, redshirting isn't cost free.
Anonymous wrote:Still wrong. Redshirting is done by insecure parents to ensure their son has an advantage on the kids in the traditional age spectrum.
Anonymous wrote:Still wrong. Redshirting is done by insecure parents to ensure their son has an advantage on the kids in the traditional age spectrum.
White Americans are the greatest advocates of redshirting, and no they do not call it holding back or redshirting. It is a tradition that schools, both public and private, are forcing on people who do not support the concept. Private and public schools advocate it all over Montgomery County. I have personally visited 26 of them to find a school for my son to attend in the Fall of 2012. All except 4 of the schools recommended redshirting as the best thing for boy children.
Many of the redshirters send the boys to private schools for multiple years of preschool including formal Kindergarden programs, then send them to public schools after they have already completed Kindergarden once or twice. The reasons they tell you they do it are the boys get a chance to grow larger and stronger to have a competitive advantage to play sports. The other reasons they say it is a good idea is they want to prevent their boys from being bullied, by letting them grow bigger and older; and they want the boys to be more "mature". The funny thing is - the redshirted boys I know are still being bullied in MoCo Kindergarden classes. Also, it is not surprising they do well academically in Kindergarden, afterall, they are repeating the same class 2 and 3 years.
I am not judging anyone, just sharing what I am being told by redshirters' parents in Montgomery County. I can't really say if I think it is right, wrong, or really matters if they are happy with it. I do believe the tradition is quite mainstream, though.
OMG, you're so full of it. It's hard to know where to begin