Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does this judge do Brendan’s sentencing too? He must be sh*tting his pants
it’s going to be uncomfortable for him. but as i understand it, his punishment is pretty well baked in.
It will be interesting to see him in a jumpsuit and interesting to hear his halting, tearful allocution. But i don’t see the judge could give him a lenient sentence even if she was inclined to do so.
i assume she will put a lot on the record for transparency.
big momma may not even make an appearance in this thing.
Anonymous wrote:Does this judge do Brendan’s sentencing too? He must be sh*tting his pants
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I did feel empathy for Juliana in her statement, I cannot pretend that I didn’t. But then when I heard the judge speak and deliver the sentence, I could not argue with that either. I believe the sentencing was just.
I also thought it was unsettling how Juliana appeared to turn to stone when the judge was speaking and did not have any visible emotional reaction to the sentence. It made me wonder, maybe she is a legit psychopath after all, not just a young and stupid and selfish person who made a massive mistake and then felt like she needed to double down to preserve herself in the aftermath.
Excellent observations and summary. I kind of experienced the same thing but wouldn’t have been able to put it in words nearly as well as you have.
I also noticed that when they showed her during Joe's aunt's statement (I missed the mother's statement), she was nodding her head and looking tearful. Then of course she was crying as she read her own statement. And when the judge spoke, and she had turned stony and emotionless, the only thing I saw her do was shake her head slightly when the judge pointed out that Juliana told the child to call her "mommy". As if she disagreed, or was angry at that part? I don't know what that means from a psychological standpoint but I do feel like she was giving the court what the court wanted to hear, and then once that didn't work, she seemed to want to argue with the court about that portion, at least. It also makes me wonder if her testimony was even truthful (I AM NOT SAYING SHE AND BB DIDN'T DO IT, I AM FULLY CONVINCED THEY DID). But she seemed so good at turning on and off her emotions at this hearing, and seemed so remorseful during her statement followed by being stone cold sober immediately afterwords, I just thought, wow, this woman can act however she thinks people want her to act, can't she. She can just turn it on and off. It colored her testimony a little in my eyes- made me wonder if she had a much greater role than she admitted to or even if the entire thing were her idea to start with.
I disagree with your characterization of Juliana while the judge was speaking. She was trying to stop crying/sniffling when Judge Azcarate first started speaking and then Juliana was nodding (slightly, but still nodding) as the Judge listed the things she’d done. I didn’t see her as stony and emotionless (not saying I feel sorry for her). I think she is finally starting to understand the weight of her actions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I did feel empathy for Juliana in her statement, I cannot pretend that I didn’t. But then when I heard the judge speak and deliver the sentence, I could not argue with that either. I believe the sentencing was just.
I also thought it was unsettling how Juliana appeared to turn to stone when the judge was speaking and did not have any visible emotional reaction to the sentence. It made me wonder, maybe she is a legit psychopath after all, not just a young and stupid and selfish person who made a massive mistake and then felt like she needed to double down to preserve herself in the aftermath.
Excellent observations and summary. I kind of experienced the same thing but wouldn’t have been able to put it in words nearly as well as you have.
I also noticed that when they showed her during Joe's aunt's statement (I missed the mother's statement), she was nodding her head and looking tearful. Then of course she was crying as she read her own statement. And when the judge spoke, and she had turned stony and emotionless, the only thing I saw her do was shake her head slightly when the judge pointed out that Juliana told the child to call her "mommy". As if she disagreed, or was angry at that part? I don't know what that means from a psychological standpoint but I do feel like she was giving the court what the court wanted to hear, and then once that didn't work, she seemed to want to argue with the court about that portion, at least. It also makes me wonder if her testimony was even truthful (I AM NOT SAYING SHE AND BB DIDN'T DO IT, I AM FULLY CONVINCED THEY DID). But she seemed so good at turning on and off her emotions at this hearing, and seemed so remorseful during her statement followed by being stone cold sober immediately afterwords, I just thought, wow, this woman can act however she thinks people want her to act, can't she. She can just turn it on and off. It colored her testimony a little in my eyes- made me wonder if she had a much greater role than she admitted to or even if the entire thing were her idea to start with.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I did feel empathy for Juliana in her statement, I cannot pretend that I didn’t. But then when I heard the judge speak and deliver the sentence, I could not argue with that either. I believe the sentencing was just.
I also thought it was unsettling how Juliana appeared to turn to stone when the judge was speaking and did not have any visible emotional reaction to the sentence. It made me wonder, maybe she is a legit psychopath after all, not just a young and stupid and selfish person who made a massive mistake and then felt like she needed to double down to preserve herself in the aftermath.
Excellent observations and summary. I kind of experienced the same thing but wouldn’t have been able to put it in words nearly as well as you have.
I also noticed that when they showed her during Joe's aunt's statement (I missed the mother's statement), she was nodding her head and looking tearful. Then of course she was crying as she read her own statement. And when the judge spoke, and she had turned stony and emotionless, the only thing I saw her do was shake her head slightly when the judge pointed out that Juliana told the child to call her "mommy". As if she disagreed, or was angry at that part? I don't know what that means from a psychological standpoint but I do feel like she was giving the court what the court wanted to hear, and then once that didn't work, she seemed to want to argue with the court about that portion, at least. It also makes me wonder if her testimony was even truthful (I AM NOT SAYING SHE AND BB DIDN'T DO IT, I AM FULLY CONVINCED THEY DID). But she seemed so good at turning on and off her emotions at this hearing, and seemed so remorseful during her statement followed by being stone cold sober immediately afterwords, I just thought, wow, this woman can act however she thinks people want her to act, can't she. She can just turn it on and off. It colored her testimony a little in my eyes- made me wonder if she had a much greater role than she admitted to or even if the entire thing were her idea to start with.
I see your point, but I also think she knew she could very well be sentenced to 10 years. So it’s almost like “ok, it is what it is”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I did feel empathy for Juliana in her statement, I cannot pretend that I didn’t. But then when I heard the judge speak and deliver the sentence, I could not argue with that either. I believe the sentencing was just.
I also thought it was unsettling how Juliana appeared to turn to stone when the judge was speaking and did not have any visible emotional reaction to the sentence. It made me wonder, maybe she is a legit psychopath after all, not just a young and stupid and selfish person who made a massive mistake and then felt like she needed to double down to preserve herself in the aftermath.
Excellent observations and summary. I kind of experienced the same thing but wouldn’t have been able to put it in words nearly as well as you have.
I also noticed that when they showed her during Joe's aunt's statement (I missed the mother's statement), she was nodding her head and looking tearful. Then of course she was crying as she read her own statement. And when the judge spoke, and she had turned stony and emotionless, the only thing I saw her do was shake her head slightly when the judge pointed out that Juliana told the child to call her "mommy". As if she disagreed, or was angry at that part? I don't know what that means from a psychological standpoint but I do feel like she was giving the court what the court wanted to hear, and then once that didn't work, she seemed to want to argue with the court about that portion, at least. It also makes me wonder if her testimony was even truthful (I AM NOT SAYING SHE AND BB DIDN'T DO IT, I AM FULLY CONVINCED THEY DID). But she seemed so good at turning on and off her emotions at this hearing, and seemed so remorseful during her statement followed by being stone cold sober immediately afterwords, I just thought, wow, this woman can act however she thinks people want her to act, can't she. She can just turn it on and off. It colored her testimony a little in my eyes- made me wonder if she had a much greater role than she admitted to or even if the entire thing were her idea to start with.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there anywhere I can watch a recording of the sentencing?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaQLLvpfHVQ
Anonymous wrote:Is there anywhere I can watch a recording of the sentencing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I did feel empathy for Juliana in her statement, I cannot pretend that I didn’t. But then when I heard the judge speak and deliver the sentence, I could not argue with that either. I believe the sentencing was just.
I also thought it was unsettling how Juliana appeared to turn to stone when the judge was speaking and did not have any visible emotional reaction to the sentence. It made me wonder, maybe she is a legit psychopath after all, not just a young and stupid and selfish person who made a massive mistake and then felt like she needed to double down to preserve herself in the aftermath.
Excellent observations and summary. I kind of experienced the same thing but wouldn’t have been able to put it in words nearly as well as you have.