Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A virtual option at every school (as has been repeatedly expressed throughout this thread) hurts the majority of children. Resources are not infinite.
What Becky wants is to harm the majority of students. That's really not ok.
If Becky truly wanted something that did not harm other children, she'd probably get more support. As it is, people should vehemently oppose a virtual option at all schools.
More resources could be poured into public education to allow a virtual option for all who want it, but doing it on a per school basis is too inefficient.
But you know what would happen? The virtual option would be flooded with kids who live in W 7 and 8, the same ones whose parents refused to send them to even one day of in person school last year, and many of whom disappeared entirely throughout the school year. THAT is why Bowser doesn't want to do it. These kids are the ones who need in person school far more than any others.
And that is why it’s icky for a ww who admittedly has means to keep her kids home shouldn’t be driving this train.
Do you feel less icky knowing that the AA w8 state board of Ed rep is also asking for a virtual option. Sorry to break the narrative
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A virtual option at every school (as has been repeatedly expressed throughout this thread) hurts the majority of children. Resources are not infinite.
What Becky wants is to harm the majority of students. That's really not ok.
If Becky truly wanted something that did not harm other children, she'd probably get more support. As it is, people should vehemently oppose a virtual option at all schools.
More resources could be poured into public education to allow a virtual option for all who want it, but doing it on a per school basis is too inefficient.
But you know what would happen? The virtual option would be flooded with kids who live in W 7 and 8, the same ones whose parents refused to send them to even one day of in person school last year, and many of whom disappeared entirely throughout the school year. THAT is why Bowser doesn't want to do it. These kids are the ones who need in person school far more than any others.
And that is why it’s icky for a ww who admittedly has means to keep her kids home shouldn’t be driving this train.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A virtual option at every school (as has been repeatedly expressed throughout this thread) hurts the majority of children. Resources are not infinite.
What Becky wants is to harm the majority of students. That's really not ok.
If Becky truly wanted something that did not harm other children, she'd probably get more support. As it is, people should vehemently oppose a virtual option at all schools.
More resources could be poured into public education to allow a virtual option for all who want it, but doing it on a per school basis is too inefficient.
But you know what would happen? The virtual option would be flooded with kids who live in W 7 and 8, the same ones whose parents refused to send them to even one day of in person school last year, and many of whom disappeared entirely throughout the school year. THAT is why Bowser doesn't want to do it. These kids are the ones who need in person school far more than any others.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A virtual option at every school (as has been repeatedly expressed throughout this thread) hurts the majority of children. Resources are not infinite.
What Becky wants is to harm the majority of students. That's really not ok.
If Becky truly wanted something that did not harm other children, she'd probably get more support. As it is, people should vehemently oppose a virtual option at all schools.
More resources could be poured into public education to allow a virtual option for all who want it, but doing it on a per school basis is too inefficient.
Anonymous wrote:A virtual option at every school (as has been repeatedly expressed throughout this thread) hurts the majority of children. Resources are not infinite.
What Becky wants is to harm the majority of students. That's really not ok.
If Becky truly wanted something that did not harm other children, she'd probably get more support. As it is, people should vehemently oppose a virtual option at all schools.
Anonymous wrote:A virtual option at every school (as has been repeatedly expressed throughout this thread) hurts the majority of children. Resources are not infinite.
What Becky wants is to harm the majority of students. That's really not ok.
If Becky truly wanted something that did not harm other children, she'd probably get more support. As it is, people should vehemently oppose a virtual option at all schools.
Anonymous wrote:
Phil Mendelson: pmendelson@dccouncil.us
Anita Bonds (At Large): abonds@dccouncil.us
Elissa Silverman (At Large): esilverman@dccouncil.us
Robert White (At Large): rwhite@dccouncil.us
Christina Henderson(At Large): chenderson@dccouncil.us
Brianne Nadeau (Ward 1): bnadeau@dccouncil.us
Brooke Pinto (Ward 2): bpinto@dccouncil.us
Mary Cheh (Ward 3): mcheh@dccouncil.us
Janeese Lewis George (Ward 4): jlewisgeorge@dccouncil.us
Kenyan McDuffie (Ward 5): kmcduffie@dccouncil.us
Charles Allen (Ward 6): callen@dccouncil.us
Vincent Gray (Ward 7): vgray@dccouncil.us
Trayon White (Ward 8): twhite@dccouncil.us
PLUS
Executive office of the mayor:
eom@dc.gov
Lewis Ferebee (Chancellor)
lewis.ferebee@dc.gov
Anonymous wrote:A virtual option at every school (as has been repeatedly expressed throughout this thread) hurts the majority of children. Resources are not infinite.
What Becky wants is to harm the majority of students. That's really not ok.
If Becky truly wanted something that did not harm other children, she'd probably get more support. As it is, people should vehemently oppose a virtual option at all schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ya’ll are incredibly mean. Even for DCUM. [/quote
We’re mean because we are posting about a person on a mission to shut down DC schools? You make yourself the public face of that, then you need to accept criticism.
In addition, if you become a school representative and therefore a public figure, be prepared for the people you are supposed to represent to be able to not agree with your proposals.
The petition is asking for central office to provide a virtual option in addition to in person instruction. They are not trying to shut down dc schools.
Anonymous wrote:Ya’ll are incredibly mean. Even for DCUM.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ya’ll are incredibly mean. Even for DCUM. [/quote
We’re mean because we are posting about a person on a mission to shut down DC schools? You make yourself the public face of that, then you need to accept criticism.
In addition, if you become a school representative and therefore a public figure, be prepared for the people you are supposed to represent to be able to not agree with your proposals.