Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm assuming it has to do with this article which just hit the news wires 30 minutes ago. He misstated the number of emails that Abedin forwarded to Weiner, the FBI issued a correction to his testimony. Seems like the WH has been waiting for any excuse to can him.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/comey-misstated-key-clinton-email-evidence-at-hearing-say-people-close-to-investigation/2017/05/09/074c1c7e-34bd-11e7-b373-418f6849a004_story.html

I would have fired him after negotiating with Hillary over taking the email server with classified material on it. You don't negotiate, you confiscate it immediately, no questions asked.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lest we forget, Hillary called the investigation into her email server a "security review". When you condemn Trump for saying he is not a target, please recall that Hillary said the same thing over and over and over. So, is Trump a target? Haven't seen any evidence that he is--except for the media.

Lynch even demanded that Comey refer to it as a "matter" not an "investigation".

Do you really think that Lynch ever intended to prosecute Hillary--she couldn't even tolerate an "investigation".......she wouldn't recuse herself.

So, do I like Trump's behavior? NO. Is it any different from Hillary's behavior? It's not any worse.

This is what I've been saying about HRC, too, and I'm not a fan. I'm a former R; couldn't stand the Clintons in the 90's. But, to Trumpsters, Trump gets a pass for cheating, lying, etc.., but her? She's called every name in the book, and Trumpsters wanted to "lock her up". Maybe she was right. Maybe those who voted for Trump because they thought HRC was a cheat and liar are sexist.

Only Trump could beat Hillary. The rest didn't know how to play half as dirty as Hillary.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another description:

Trump’s anger reached a boiling point when Comey refused to preview for top Trump aides his planned testimony before a Senate panel last week. From Reuters’ Steve Holland and Jeff Mason: “Trump, Sessions and Rosenstein had wanted a heads-up from Comey about what he would say at a May 3 hearing about his handling of an investigation into [Clinton's] use of a private email server. When Comey refused, Trump and his aides considered that an act of insubordination … A former Trump adviser said Trump was also angry because Comey had never offered a public exoneration of Trump in the FBI probe into contacts between the U.S. ambassador to Russia, Sergei Kislyak, and Trump campaign advisers last year.” One adviser said Comey’s Senate testimony on Clinton reinforced in Trump’s mind that “Comey was against him.” "He regretted what he did to Hillary but not what he did to Trump," A former adviser added.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/daily-202/2017/05/11/daily-202-why-is-paul-ryan-really-defending-trump-firing-comey/5913bd13e9b69b209cf2b80c/?utm_term=.bb61a1163b4c

It's all about Trump wanting loyalists to protect him. Comey was not beholden to Trump, so Trump can't guarantee his loyalty. Trump sees that as a threat.

This so-called POTUS is truly frightening. He becomes more of a threat to this country everyday he is in office. He truly wants to run that office like his personal family owned business. God help us all. You Trumpsters have truly screwed us.

It is what happens when we give the American voters a choice between two unpalatable choices. Hillary should never have been the nominee of the Democratic party. I don't blame just the Trump voters ....... I think we bear some responsibility for nominating a disastrous candidate.

? Nope. Every one needs to take ownership of their own choices, not the choices of others.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lest we forget, Hillary called the investigation into her email server a "security review". When you condemn Trump for saying he is not a target, please recall that Hillary said the same thing over and over and over. So, is Trump a target? Haven't seen any evidence that he is--except for the media.

Lynch even demanded that Comey refer to it as a "matter" not an "investigation".

Do you really think that Lynch ever intended to prosecute Hillary--she couldn't even tolerate an "investigation".......she wouldn't recuse herself.

So, do I like Trump's behavior? NO. Is it any different from Hillary's behavior? It's not any worse.

This is what I've been saying about HRC, too, and I'm not a fan. I'm a former R; couldn't stand the Clintons in the 90's. But, to Trumpsters, Trump gets a pass for cheating, lying, etc.., but her? She's called every name in the book, and Trumpsters wanted to "lock her up". Maybe she was right. Maybe those who voted for Trump because they thought HRC was a cheat and liar are sexist.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lest we forget, Hillary called the investigation into her email server a "security review". When you condemn Trump for saying he is not a target, please recall that Hillary said the same thing over and over and over. So, is Trump a target? Haven't seen any evidence that he is--except for the media.

Lynch even demanded that Comey refer to it as a "matter" not an "investigation".

Do you really think that Lynch ever intended to prosecute Hillary--she couldn't even tolerate an "investigation".......she wouldn't recuse herself.

So, do I like Trump's behavior? NO. Is it any different from Hillary's behavior? It's not any worse.

This is what I've been saying about HRC, too, and I'm not a fan. I'm a former R; couldn't stand the Clintons in the 90's. But, to Trumpsters, Trump gets a pass for cheating, lying, etc.., but her? She's called every name in the book, and Trumpsters wanted to "lock her up". Maybe she was right. Maybe those who voted for Trump because they thought HRC was a cheat and liar are sexist.

Anonymous wrote:Lest we forget, Hillary called the investigation into her email server a "security review". When you condemn Trump for saying he is not a target, please recall that Hillary said the same thing over and over and over. So, is Trump a target? Haven't seen any evidence that he is--except for the media.

Lynch even demanded that Comey refer to it as a "matter" not an "investigation".

Do you really think that Lynch ever intended to prosecute Hillary--she couldn't even tolerate an "investigation".......she wouldn't recuse herself.

So, do I like Trump's behavior? NO. Is it any different from Hillary's behavior? It's not any worse.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another description:

Trump’s anger reached a boiling point when Comey refused to preview for top Trump aides his planned testimony before a Senate panel last week. From Reuters’ Steve Holland and Jeff Mason: “Trump, Sessions and Rosenstein had wanted a heads-up from Comey about what he would say at a May 3 hearing about his handling of an investigation into [Clinton's] use of a private email server. When Comey refused, Trump and his aides considered that an act of insubordination … A former Trump adviser said Trump was also angry because Comey had never offered a public exoneration of Trump in the FBI probe into contacts between the U.S. ambassador to Russia, Sergei Kislyak, and Trump campaign advisers last year.” One adviser said Comey’s Senate testimony on Clinton reinforced in Trump’s mind that “Comey was against him.” "He regretted what he did to Hillary but not what he did to Trump," A former adviser added.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/daily-202/2017/05/11/daily-202-why-is-paul-ryan-really-defending-trump-firing-comey/5913bd13e9b69b209cf2b80c/?utm_term=.bb61a1163b4c

It's all about Trump wanting loyalists to protect him. Comey was not beholden to Trump, so Trump can't guarantee his loyalty. Trump sees that as a threat.

This so-called POTUS is truly frightening. He becomes more of a threat to this country everyday he is in office. He truly wants to run that office like his personal family owned business. God help us all. You Trumpsters have truly screwed us.

It is what happens when we give the American voters a choice between two unpalatable choices. Hillary should never have been the nominee of the Democratic party. I don't blame just the Trump voters ....... I think we bear some responsibility for nominating a disastrous candidate.

Go eff yourself. No, we're not doing this. We have the Republican candidate who WORKED WITH RUSSIA TO GET ELECTED. Game over. The GOP sucks. It is the treason party.

Go eff YOURself. That's what you should be doing for nominating a person who lost to this guy! Keep on spouting assumptions as facts. It's a good excuse in the meantime. Add it to the pile of 'em. The thinking amongst us will wait until there is proof.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another description:

Trump’s anger reached a boiling point when Comey refused to preview for top Trump aides his planned testimony before a Senate panel last week. From Reuters’ Steve Holland and Jeff Mason: “Trump, Sessions and Rosenstein had wanted a heads-up from Comey about what he would say at a May 3 hearing about his handling of an investigation into [Clinton's] use of a private email server. When Comey refused, Trump and his aides considered that an act of insubordination … A former Trump adviser said Trump was also angry because Comey had never offered a public exoneration of Trump in the FBI probe into contacts between the U.S. ambassador to Russia, Sergei Kislyak, and Trump campaign advisers last year.” One adviser said Comey’s Senate testimony on Clinton reinforced in Trump’s mind that “Comey was against him.” "He regretted what he did to Hillary but not what he did to Trump," A former adviser added.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/daily-202/2017/05/11/daily-202-why-is-paul-ryan-really-defending-trump-firing-comey/5913bd13e9b69b209cf2b80c/?utm_term=.bb61a1163b4c

It's all about Trump wanting loyalists to protect him. Comey was not beholden to Trump, so Trump can't guarantee his loyalty. Trump sees that as a threat.

This so-called POTUS is truly frightening. He becomes more of a threat to this country everyday he is in office. He truly wants to run that office like his personal family owned business. God help us all. You Trumpsters have truly screwed us.

It is what happens when we give the American voters a choice between two unpalatable choices. Hillary should never have been the nominee of the Democratic party. I don't blame just the Trump voters ....... I think we bear some responsibility for nominating a disastrous candidate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump just gave an interview where he said that he was going to fire Comey before the meeting with the AG and DAG. He lies so often, that while this sounds like the truth, there's no way to know.

He's lying. He didn't need a ginned-up paper trail to fire Comey. He thinks this new spin makes him appear "decisive." He forgets what Pence and Huckabee-Sanders were told to spin. Trump was fully supportive of Comey until his recent testimony.

Alzheimer's will do that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another description:

Trump’s anger reached a boiling point when Comey refused to preview for top Trump aides his planned testimony before a Senate panel last week. From Reuters’ Steve Holland and Jeff Mason: “Trump, Sessions and Rosenstein had wanted a heads-up from Comey about what he would say at a May 3 hearing about his handling of an investigation into [Clinton's] use of a private email server. When Comey refused, Trump and his aides considered that an act of insubordination … A former Trump adviser said Trump was also angry because Comey had never offered a public exoneration of Trump in the FBI probe into contacts between the U.S. ambassador to Russia, Sergei Kislyak, and Trump campaign advisers last year.” One adviser said Comey’s Senate testimony on Clinton reinforced in Trump’s mind that “Comey was against him.” "He regretted what he did to Hillary but not what he did to Trump," A former adviser added.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/daily-202/2017/05/11/daily-202-why-is-paul-ryan-really-defending-trump-firing-comey/5913bd13e9b69b209cf2b80c/?utm_term=.bb61a1163b4c

It's all about Trump wanting loyalists to protect him. Comey was not beholden to Trump, so Trump can't guarantee his loyalty. Trump sees that as a threat.

This so-called POTUS is truly frightening. He becomes more of a threat to this country everyday he is in office. He truly wants to run that office like his personal family owned business. God help us all. You Trumpsters have truly screwed us.

It is what happens when we give the American voters a choice between two unpalatable choices. Hillary should never have been the nominee of the Democratic party. I don't blame just the Trump voters ....... I think we bear some responsibility for nominating a disastrous candidate.

Go eff yourself. No, we're not doing this. We have the Republican candidate who WORKED WITH RUSSIA TO GET ELECTED. Game over. The GOP sucks. It is the treason party.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do these people not hope to get a job after Trump is no longer president? Why are they all ruining their credibility and reputations? Sessions, Sanders, Spicer? Why are they willing to lie for him? They just look so dumb.

Stockholm Syndrome?

Let's be honest - If they were smart people, they sure as hell wouldn't be working for the fat man.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump just gave an interview where he said that he was going to fire Comey before the meeting with the AG and DAG. He lies so often, that while this sounds like the truth, there's no way to know.

It contradicts what Mike Pence and Sarah Huckabee Sanders said with regard to the firing.

Maybe the people around him should stop trying to make things more palatable and start speaking the truth. It's so much easier. Comey was fired because he hurt the president's feelings and couldn't be trusted to protect him.

What have they got to lose?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do these people not hope to get a job after Trump is no longer president? Why are they all ruining their credibility and reputations? Sessions, Sanders, Spicer? Why are they willing to lie for him? They just look so dumb.

Stockholm Syndrome?

Anonymous wrote:Do these people not hope to get a job after Trump is no longer president? Why are they all ruining their credibility and reputations? Sessions, Sanders, Spicer? Why are they willing to lie for him? They just look so dumb.