Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jennifer Jacobs with CBS confirmed that he’s rebuilding the presidential operations center, the bunker.
That’s what this has always been about and he is rushing to do it. Why?
If there was a legitimate reason to update the bunker — go to congress. Get authorization. Get apropos. Get checks and balances.
But that did not happen.
What is he up to??
I hope he’s not going to get us nuked while he lives out his life underground, but he’s such a vile narcissist I could see it happening. Though does Thiel stay at the White House or does he go to his bunker in New Zealand?
They’re probably all fans of the show Paradise.
Anonymous wrote:I read an architectural analysis of what’s been announced and it makes no sense, especially the square footage. There are no fully fleshed out plans, just intern-level renderings (where the inside and the outside done even add up) The announced price keeps going up. They can’t build what they’re planning. So I think it’s just a huge money grab for Trump. He’s going to skim the money off of the “foundation” and the building will run into “huge delays” and will be unfinished in 2029. They will claim that they ran into “unexpected issues” and “ran out of money” and will stick it to the US taxpayer to finish rebuilding the WH.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jennifer Jacobs with CBS confirmed that he’s rebuilding the presidential operations center, the bunker.
That’s what this has always been about and he is rushing to do it. Why?
If there was a legitimate reason to update the bunker — go to congress. Get authorization. Get apropos. Get checks and balances.
But that did not happen.
What is he up to??
I hope he’s not going to get us nuked while he lives out his life underground, but he’s such a vile narcissist I could see it happening. Though does Thiel stay at the White House or does he go to his bunker in New Zealand?
They’re probably all fans of the show Paradise.
Anonymous wrote:Here are some statistics to consider regarding the new White House Ballroom.
The projected size of the new facility is 90,000 square feet and the projected cost is $300 million. That works out to $3333 per square foot. On-line cost estimators suggest $300 - $500 per square foot for a “premium venue” space. $1500 per square foot would be reaching the upper limit for practically any project. For example:
• An acute care medical facility, which can cost up to $1,468 per square foot in New York City and $1,455 per square foot in Honolulu.
• A museum/performing arts building which can cost up to $1,304 in New York City.
• A five-star hotel, which can cost up to $1,108 in New York City and $1,044 in San Francisco.
• A high-rise office building in New York City ($1,026).
A sit-down banquet requires 10–12 square feet per person for a comfortable setup. That includes room for chairs, a little elbow room, and walkways for guests and servers. At 20 square feet per person, 999 people would require just under 20,000 square feet. Throw in another 10,000 square feet for pre-function, support functions, maybe a dance floor and it’s still only 30,000 square feet.
That leaves a surplus of 60,000 square feet. What's that all about?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Things Republicans would explode in anger over it were Biden for $500, Alex
Yeah no. You are such a lying hypocrite.
What am I seeing here? Is this a single republican who is angry about this? Please explain?
Notice the “White House destruction! OMG!!” in the background?
- he is pointing out that Obama did that. With taxpayer money. Yes: that background photo shows the Obama-ordered demolition of the historic WH building to make way for Obama’s basketball court.
Democrats are hypocrites.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Things Republicans would explode in anger over it were Biden for $500, Alex
Yeah no. You are such a lying hypocrite.
What am I seeing here? Is this a single republican who is angry about this? Please explain?
Notice the “White House destruction! OMG!!” in the background?
- he is pointing out that Obama did that. With taxpayer money. Yes: that background photo shows the Obama-ordered demolition of the historic WH building to make way for Obama’s basketball court.
Democrats are hypocrites.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Things Republicans would explode in anger over it were Biden for $500, Alex
Yeah no. You are such a lying hypocrite.
What am I seeing here? Is this a single republican who is angry about this? Please explain?
Notice the “White House destruction! OMG!!” in the background?
- he is pointing out that Obama did that. With taxpayer money. Yes: that background photo shows the Obama-ordered demolition of the historic WH building to make way for Obama’s basketball court.
Democrats are hypocrites.
Anonymous wrote:I read an architectural analysis of what’s been announced and it makes no sense, especially the square footage. There are no fully fleshed out plans, just intern-level renderings (where the inside and the outside done even add up) The announced price keeps going up. They can’t build what they’re planning. So I think it’s just a huge money grab for Trump. He’s going to skim the money off of the “foundation” and the building will run into “huge delays” and will be unfinished in 2029. They will claim that they ran into “unexpected issues” and “ran out of money” and will stick it to the US taxpayer to finish rebuilding the WH.
Anonymous wrote:Jennifer Jacobs with CBS confirmed that he’s rebuilding the presidential operations center, the bunker.
That’s what this has always been about and he is rushing to do it. Why?
If there was a legitimate reason to update the bunker — go to congress. Get authorization. Get apropos. Get checks and balances.
But that did not happen.
What is he up to??