Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats want to expand abortion to all trimesters. They are liars. Abortions used to be emergency medicine not an elective procedure and Republicans want to go back to that.
They believe in killing a 28 week old baby with a heartbeat. That’s infanticide. The fetal tissue from late term abortions was being sold on the black market according to Sarah Merritt, a whistleblower in California who Kamala Harris prosecuted
2015 Merritt, along with David Daleiden, released videos exposing Planned Parenthood’s alleged involvement in the illegal trade of aborted baby body parts. The undercover work spanned nearly three years and exposed an underground market wherein Planned Parenthood supplied baby body parts to others for profit.
In response to that undercover journalistic work, Merritt has faced civil and criminal charges
Democrats support Roe.
Sometimes, even during Roe, a medical abortion was necessary in the 3rd term because the fetus was no longer viable or the health of the mother was at risk. If either of these conditions occurred currently in states with restrictive rules, the pregnant woman would be SOL, right? Is that what you support?
Also, how many "vanity" abortions do you think took place in the third trimester in the US? How many doctors do you think are even willing to conduct such a procedure? (hint: none)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love that the right is saying women need to put with their husbands.... Then what possibly was the point of gaining the right to vote if I have to vote exactly how another human being does. I would be doubling his voting power and having none of my own.
But of course that's what they want women to not have a voice and willingly choose to give it away
You’re confused. It’s the left suggesting in ridiculous online screeds that republican women are too scared to vote against their husbands’ wishes. Faux concern and insulting to other women.
+1
Married for 36 years and every election voted differently than my republican DH. That ad is insulting to both women and men.
My husband was a liberal democrat until I fixed him!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Roe. Roe. Roe. This is what the majority of the people want for very good reason.
Is Kamala going to poison five judges with cyanide? How is she going to fix the Supreme Court?
Anonymous wrote:Roe. Roe. Roe. This is what the majority of the people want for very good reason.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love that the right is saying women need to put with their husbands.... Then what possibly was the point of gaining the right to vote if I have to vote exactly how another human being does. I would be doubling his voting power and having none of my own.
But of course that's what they want women to not have a voice and willingly choose to give it away
You’re confused. It’s the left suggesting in ridiculous online screeds that republican women are too scared to vote against their husbands’ wishes. Faux concern and insulting to other women.
+1
Married for 36 years and every election voted differently than my republican DH. That ad is insulting to both women and men.
Not every woman is as lucky as you. Maybe respect that and understand, the ad was not targeting you.
The ad was suitably scorned for its belittling of women.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love that the right is saying women need to put with their husbands.... Then what possibly was the point of gaining the right to vote if I have to vote exactly how another human being does. I would be doubling his voting power and having none of my own.
But of course that's what they want women to not have a voice and willingly choose to give it away
You’re confused. It’s the left suggesting in ridiculous online screeds that republican women are too scared to vote against their husbands’ wishes. Faux concern and insulting to other women.
+1
Married for 36 years and every election voted differently than my republican DH. That ad is insulting to both women and men.
Not every woman is as lucky as you. Maybe respect that and understand, the ad was not targeting you.
If those unlucky women can’t tell their husband who they’re voting for - or their husband intimidates them that much, those woman have much bigger problems than elections and politics.
They do. The results of this election also will affect their means to deal with them.
The GOP is going after no-fault divorce, too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is not even just about abortion, as many here know.
For those who just have no clue: Planned Parenthood is a place to get testing, ask questions, and get services--sometimes the only /only affordable place to go--that have nothing to do with abortion.
As far as I can tell, forced birthers don’t think women should be able to access health care at any point. They want to cancel Obamacare, they hate Planned Parenthood despite it being the most accessible and affordable point of access for medical care, they think women should just go ahead and die for need of an abortion, the fact that women’s bodies are relatively unstudied and that our medical issues are still not taken seriously at all doesn’t seem to bother them.
I think forced birthers think women should just go ahead and be miserable and die young, as they think God intended.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love that the right is saying women need to put with their husbands.... Then what possibly was the point of gaining the right to vote if I have to vote exactly how another human being does. I would be doubling his voting power and having none of my own.
But of course that's what they want women to not have a voice and willingly choose to give it away
You’re confused. It’s the left suggesting in ridiculous online screeds that republican women are too scared to vote against their husbands’ wishes. Faux concern and insulting to other women.
+1
Married for 36 years and every election voted differently than my republican DH. That ad is insulting to both women and men.
Not every woman is as lucky as you. Maybe respect that and understand, the ad was not targeting you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love that the right is saying women need to put with their husbands.... Then what possibly was the point of gaining the right to vote if I have to vote exactly how another human being does. I would be doubling his voting power and having none of my own.
But of course that's what they want women to not have a voice and willingly choose to give it away
You’re confused. It’s the left suggesting in ridiculous online screeds that republican women are too scared to vote against their husbands’ wishes. Faux concern and insulting to other women.
+1
Married for 36 years and every election voted differently than my republican DH. That ad is insulting to both women and men.
Not every woman is as lucky as you. Maybe respect that and understand, the ad was not targeting you.
If those unlucky women can’t tell their husband who they’re voting for - or their husband intimidates them that much, those woman have much bigger problems than elections and politics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love that the right is saying women need to put with their husbands.... Then what possibly was the point of gaining the right to vote if I have to vote exactly how another human being does. I would be doubling his voting power and having none of my own.
But of course that's what they want women to not have a voice and willingly choose to give it away
You’re confused. It’s the left suggesting in ridiculous online screeds that republican women are too scared to vote against their husbands’ wishes. Faux concern and insulting to other women.
+1
Married for 36 years and every election voted differently than my republican DH. That ad is insulting to both women and men.
Not every woman is as lucky as you. Maybe respect that and understand, the ad was not targeting you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love that the right is saying women need to put with their husbands.... Then what possibly was the point of gaining the right to vote if I have to vote exactly how another human being does. I would be doubling his voting power and having none of my own.
But of course that's what they want women to not have a voice and willingly choose to give it away
You’re confused. It’s the left suggesting in ridiculous online screeds that republican women are too scared to vote against their husbands’ wishes. Faux concern and insulting to other women.
+1
Married for 36 years and every election voted differently than my republican DH. That ad is insulting to both women and men.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love that the right is saying women need to put with their husbands.... Then what possibly was the point of gaining the right to vote if I have to vote exactly how another human being does. I would be doubling his voting power and having none of my own.
But of course that's what they want women to not have a voice and willingly choose to give it away
You’re confused. It’s the left suggesting in ridiculous online screeds that republican women are too scared to vote against their husbands’ wishes. Faux concern and insulting to other women.
+1
Married for 36 years and every election voted differently than my republican DH. That ad is insulting to both women and men.