Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's get this right. Settlers came to America and built something. Immigrants came to something that was already built.

Invaders came to America.

There was already something it here.

This about nationhood, not land. A set of people built a nation.

Every immigrant can make the same claim m

Vance is giving a master class in debating.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The slickest thing the pro-immigration globalist have done is to convince people that being against immigration is "racism".

America is a nation of immigrants. So yeah, opposing it is racist.

Do try to keep up.

Your first two sentences do not go together, so the "so" does not make sense.

America is not a nation of immigrants. Immigrants have decided to come to an established nation. This is a nuance but important. Not all Americans are descendant from immigrants. Does our history not matter?

Holy cow.

You want to send the Europeans back to Europe, Chief Big Horse?
Sure, do it.

A set of Europeans (mostly if not all Englishmen) established the nation. Oh and they brought over some in the hullls of ships to build the economy. None of the descendants of these two groups are immigrant. You can't be an immigrant in a country you literally built from scratch on paper and with your hands.

I think this poster wants to send back the Irish, Italians, Eastern Europeans, Japanese, etc etc….

No, just understand that there is a history before mass immigration and many of us do not feel any connection to the concept of "nation of immigrants".

Just understand that if you are not a member of an Indian nation then that implies your ancestors migrated here - either willingly or unwillingly -but they came from other countries.

If Americans felt little connection to the concept of a "nation of immigrants" they probably wouldn't be so heavily into genealogy. True fact.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The slickest thing the pro-immigration globalist have done is to convince people that being against immigration is "racism".

America is a nation of immigrants. So yeah, opposing it is racist.

Do try to keep up.

Your first two sentences do not go together, so the "so" does not make sense.

America is not a nation of immigrants. Immigrants have decided to come to an established nation. This is a nuance but important. Not all Americans are descendant from immigrants. Does our history not matter?

Holy cow.

You want to send the Europeans back to Europe, Chief Big Horse?
Sure, do it.

A set of Europeans (mostly if not all Englishmen) established the nation. Oh and they brought over some in the hullls of ships to build the economy. None of the descendants of these two groups are immigrant. You can't be an immigrant in a country you literally built from scratch on paper and with your hands.

I think this poster wants to send back the Irish, Italians, Eastern Europeans, Japanese, etc etc….

No, just understand that there is a history before mass immigration and many of us do not feel any connection to the concept of "nation of immigrants".

Understand that your insistence on this sounds like MAGA. So think about that. You sound like you are against immigration.

Vance blew it on Jan 6. Walz cut him down with facts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The slickest thing the pro-immigration globalist have done is to convince people that being against immigration is "racism".

America is a nation of immigrants. So yeah, opposing it is racist.

Do try to keep up.

Your first two sentences do not go together, so the "so" does not make sense.

America is not a nation of immigrants. Immigrants have decided to come to an established nation. This is a nuance but important. Not all Americans are descendant from immigrants. Does our history not matter?

Holy cow.

You want to send the Europeans back to Europe, Chief Big Horse?
Sure, do it.

A set of Europeans (mostly if not all Englishmen) established the nation. Oh and they brought over some in the hullls of ships to build the economy. None of the descendants of these two groups are immigrant. You can't be an immigrant in a country you literally built from scratch on paper and with your hands.

A civics lesson from a slaver, hey neighbor
Your debts are paid 'cause you don't pay for labor
"We plant seeds in the South. We create." Yeah, keep ranting
We know who's really doing the planting

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, Vance closing on "Elect me so America is safe for the worst people saying the worst things".

Nope.

I do remember people being kicked off Facebook for saying Covid came from a lab.

Then 3 years later Fauci admits it probably did and the govt was wrong claiming it came from a market.

He did not say it probably did. You are wrong.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's get this right. Settlers came to America and built something. Immigrants came to something that was already built.

Invaders came to America.

There was already something it here.

This about nationhood, not land. A set of people built a nation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, Vance closing on "Elect me so America is safe for the worst people saying the worst things".

Nope.

I do remember people being kicked off Facebook for saying Covid came from a lab.

Then 3 years later Fauci admits it probably did and the govt was wrong claiming it came from a market.

Actually there have been several recent articles stating that the final answer seems to be that the virus did, indeed, come from the food market. Look it up.

Anonymous wrote:Let's get this right. Settlers came to America and built something. Immigrants came to something that was already built.

Were you around in the 1700s? Or, like the rest of us, were you born in the late 1900s when things were already built? Or did you have a different point!

It’s all irrelevant other than immigration.

Anonymous wrote:I love that on preserving democracy Walz said I think you can see here pointing to himself “who’s gonna honor democracy” then ponying toward Vance and saying and “who’s gonna honor Donald Trump?”

👏🏼👏🏼

"Where is the firewall with Donald Trump?" There's a reason Mike Pence isn't on this stage. What will Donald Trump do to steal this election if his VP will do nothing? "That is the choice, America."

- Walz finally lands the most meaningful of blows.

While Vance freezes his weasel face into a smile. Not responding or saying a word.

FINALLY

the only thing that would have made that better is to have regurgitated that Vance would have done what Pence didn't do.

Anonymous wrote:Walz wins with the ultimate zinger. that is why Pence isn't on this stage.

He wins wins wins.

Bam.

Pence isn't on that stage because Trump supporters tried to hang him while Trump watched it all on TV