Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/trump-admits-he-ruined-border-deal-to-hurt-democrats-204614213852

He admits he did it on purpose.

He has truly mastered the art of saying the quiet part out loud.

I mean what does it matter when his cultists run around repeating conflicting talking points like there’s nothing inherently incoherent about that? It’s not like they’re loyal enough to the country to try to be sensible; they’re happy to try and inflict damage wherever.

Anonymous wrote:https://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/trump-admits-he-ruined-border-deal-to-hurt-democrats-204614213852

He admits he did it on purpose.

He has truly mastered the art of saying the quiet part out loud.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it people's opinion that had Trump been reelected in 2020, the same number of immigrants or more would have come through the southern border?

No, the numbers would be about one quarter of what they are now. Possibly one tenth.

It was probably a lot easier for Donnie because Russia wasn’t sending people to America for the purposes of creating Republican talking points.

Why do you think Russia wants Donnie back so badly that they spend propaganda resources on convincing people to go to America?

Also why are the GOP’s genitals in a vise at Donnie’s pleasure? He clearly enjoys squeezing them and telling your party what to do, even though he’s powerless.

Anonymous wrote:Is it people's opinion that had Trump been reelected in 2020, the same number of immigrants or more would have come through the southern border?

No, the numbers would be about one quarter of what they are now. Possibly one tenth.

https://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/trump-admits-he-ruined-border-deal-to-hurt-democrats-204614213852

He admits he did it on purpose.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are completely unserious about addressing the border and immigration issues.

PROVEN.

Correct. But they’re back to whining about it and pretending that Trump didn’t crush the legislation. Oh and they’re lying about the legislation too.

The democrat candidates will be sure to remind of what happened to this legislation. It is a winning strategy.

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are completely unserious about addressing the border and immigration issues.

PROVEN.

Correct. But they’re back to whining about it and pretending that Trump didn’t crush the legislation. Oh and they’re lying about the legislation too.

The problem is that democrats are also completely unserious about addressing the border and immigration issues.
Their solution is to grant amnesty to most already here. The VP said it last week. That would absolutely cause another stampede to the border an another immigration crisis over the net few years.

Republicans are completely unserious about addressing the border and immigration issues.

PROVEN.

Meanwhile it's still and ABSOLUTE FACT that Trump is blocking a border deal in the Senate

Anonymous wrote:Doubt the GOP can come up with a winning candidate for this district after Santos disaster.

They couldn't, and didn't.

Is it people's opinion that had Trump been reelected in 2020, the same number of immigrants or more would have come through the southern border?

Doubt the GOP can come up with a winning candidate for this district after Santos disaster.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans in NC are running ads about how they will protect the border because Biden hasn't.

That was just tried in the NY special election. The dem candidate came right back with support for the border bill and that he is the one that will protect the border and he won and the and the GOP candidate lost.

The border proposal does not really protect the border.

The voters apparently decided otherwise.

No, I don’t think they did. That is rank speculation extrapolated from a meaningless sample. Also, it doesn’t.

meaningless swing voters? ok.

They did. Watch the debate like the voters did. The GOP candidate had no solutions and no answer for not supporting the bill. The voters said immigration wan as important issue and they chose the democrat to deal with it over GOP empty promises nonsense.

Queens turned this out for the Ds due to the $ difference. They will lose this in November, probably on immigration.

Actually, turnout was much higher in Nassau than in Queens and you still lost big.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans in NC are running ads about how they will protect the border because Biden hasn't.

That was just tried in the NY special election. The dem candidate came right back with support for the border bill and that he is the one that will protect the border and he won and the and the GOP candidate lost.

The border proposal does not really protect the border.

The voters apparently decided otherwise.

No, I don’t think they did. That is rank speculation extrapolated from a meaningless sample. Also, it doesn’t.

meaningless swing voters? ok.

They did. Watch the debate like the voters did. The GOP candidate had no solutions and no answer for not supporting the bill. The voters said immigration wan as important issue and they chose the democrat to deal with it over GOP empty promises nonsense.

Queens turned this out for the Ds due to the $ difference. They will lose this in November, probably on immigration.

They are redrawing the district.

That district is remaining the same. No, the only districts that are changing boundaries are in central NY and the Hudson Valley. The affected Reps are Williams, Ryan and Molinaro.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/02/14/house-redistricting-new-york-00141458