Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If rankings have any correlation to college commits, here is the list:

1. Georgetown Prep - 15
2-4. Gonzaga/Landon/Dematha - 10
5-8. Bullis/SJC/SSSA/PaulVI - 9
9. STA - 6
10. St. Andrews - 5
11. Episcopal - 4
12. Potomac - 3
13-14. Good Counsel/Heights - 2

They don’t.

There is some correlation. How good the program they committed to are may matter as much as overall number. But even with just the total numbers people would be surprised if for example Gonzaga or Landon with 10 lost to Good Counsel or Heights with 2.

I think it is also the quality of the commitment. SJC has players ranked in the top 100 over all some of the others do not. If Dematha has an extra D3 player on the roster it will not mean they can beat the top teams. I think you could break them down in tiers.

Tier One: GTP, Bullis, SJC, Gonzaga
Tier Two: Landon, PVI, Dematha, SSSA, STA
Tier Three: The rest

Does Tier One have the strongest 2025/2026 classes?

Who really cares about 25/26 classes? Rarely does more than one or two players make an impact in those grades. If a team is relying on freshman and sophomore contributions they are not in Tier one by default.

I disagree. I think you can have 25s that are impact players. Maybe not 26s. Some of the 25s are holdbacks anyway so it is completely plausible that they will be impact players this spring.

Ok. Name the school and position that is impacted by a 2025 that is projected to be at least all conference this year? It may happen but this is still pre season. I think the tiers are accurate based on upper class players.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Have fun playing St. James, St. Albans, Episcopal and Landon. 🥴"

I'd rather play the teams listed above than play Bishop McNamara, Ireton, O'Connell, Good Counsel, and Saint Mary's Ryken (the bottom half of the WCAC is just bad lacrosse), Wes knows he doesn't have nearly the same squad as he did last year and it shows in their schedule this Spring. Where is McDonogh or Saint Mary's?

Unfortunately those are league teams. I’d say 3 of the 5 would smoke any IAC team in football and 4 of the 5 in basketball. You got to take the good with the bad. What other sports is the IAC good in? Boys field hockey?

This is hilarious. Do better next time. Which three of those WCAC teams would smoke any IAC team in football? Remember, they often play each other and scores are easily found. Nice try though. It certainly sounded like a great post when you were typing it, I'm sure.

Didn’t even know IAC played FB. Lol Have they ever had a team recognized on the national level? Last time I remember seeing any WCAC team playing them was a few years back. Gonzaga destroyed Prep that year. Probably why the WCAC teams don’t waste their time. Little sisters of the poor.

Look, I was responding to a PP who claimed BI, Oconnell, St. Mary's Ryken, McNamara and one other bottom feeder WCAC school would smoke the IAC in football and basketball. The stats don't back that up. Nobody was trying to put the IAC on the same pedestal as the WCAC football powerhouses that have more than 2x the number of boys in the high school. Some IAC schools have less than 300 boys. They still do pretty well against the WCAC second tier. Relax, Gonzaga dad. Relax.

Alrighty mouthy IAC dad. Prove it.

Go look at the scores from last year. And the year(s) before. Surely you can use the internet. Don't be dense.

The days of trying to compare conferences ended years ago. The WCAC allows for athletic scholarships which are not need based and the IAC doesn't (largely upheld now that Bullis has a new president). SJC lacrosse has jumped on that over the last 3 years and created a competition gap. The IAC has stopped scheduling them in general bc of the imbalance and the aggressive nature of their recruiting current students. The WCAC is a National sports conference with compensated athletes and the IAC isn’t. It’s not going to get any better.

WCAC schools do NOT and CANNOT offer athletics scholarships only need-based or academic. That's not saying that they may be able to fit the athletes they recruit into one of those categories but there are requirements such as financials as well as required grades to maintain those scholarships.

100% correct.

As others mentioned it is very rare in lacrosse v football and basketball

SJC lax has been actively giving athletic scholarships for 4 years. The Hawks parents brag about it. Mitchell took a NL player from Bullis to DeMatha mid-semester on full scholarship. The family and the kid brags about it.

Prep houses players from out of town and gives scholarships.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Have fun playing St. James, St. Albans, Episcopal and Landon. 🥴"

I'd rather play the teams listed above than play Bishop McNamara, Ireton, O'Connell, Good Counsel, and Saint Mary's Ryken (the bottom half of the WCAC is just bad lacrosse), Wes knows he doesn't have nearly the same squad as he did last year and it shows in their schedule this Spring. Where is McDonogh or Saint Mary's?

Unfortunately those are league teams. I’d say 3 of the 5 would smoke any IAC team in football and 4 of the 5 in basketball. You got to take the good with the bad. What other sports is the IAC good in? Boys field hockey?

This is hilarious. Do better next time. Which three of those WCAC teams would smoke any IAC team in football? Remember, they often play each other and scores are easily found. Nice try though. It certainly sounded like a great post when you were typing it, I'm sure.

Didn’t even know IAC played FB. Lol Have they ever had a team recognized on the national level? Last time I remember seeing any WCAC team playing them was a few years back. Gonzaga destroyed Prep that year. Probably why the WCAC teams don’t waste their time. Little sisters of the poor.

Look, I was responding to a PP who claimed BI, Oconnell, St. Mary's Ryken, McNamara and one other bottom feeder WCAC school would smoke the IAC in football and basketball. The stats don't back that up. Nobody was trying to put the IAC on the same pedestal as the WCAC football powerhouses that have more than 2x the number of boys in the high school. Some IAC schools have less than 300 boys. They still do pretty well against the WCAC second tier. Relax, Gonzaga dad. Relax.

Alrighty mouthy IAC dad. Prove it.

Go look at the scores from last year. And the year(s) before. Surely you can use the internet. Don't be dense.

The days of trying to compare conferences ended years ago. The WCAC allows for athletic scholarships which are not need based and the IAC doesn't (largely upheld now that Bullis has a new president). SJC lacrosse has jumped on that over the last 3 years and created a competition gap. The IAC has stopped scheduling them in general bc of the imbalance and the aggressive nature of their recruiting current students. The WCAC is a National sports conference with compensated athletes and the IAC isn’t. It’s not going to get any better.

WCAC schools do NOT and CANNOT offer athletics scholarships only need-based or academic. That's not saying that they may be able to fit the athletes they recruit into one of those categories but there are requirements such as financials as well as required grades to maintain those scholarships.

100% correct.

The WCAC absolutely offers athletic scholarships and the manual has been posted on this site before. They don’t hide it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No Merit aid or scholarships in the IAC. Financial aid is based on documentation submitted by families to the school.

The same applies to the WCAC you can get needs-based money which is solely based on financial situations and there must be documentation or academic based which is based on actual grades it all has to be accompanied by documentation and if the grades are no good they get no academic money plain and simple...

I guess some are just bitter that the IAC can't keep up with the WCAC and have to look for excuses

WCAC schools can offer merit money, IAC schools do not. My son was offered $10K a year in merit money for a WCAC school, he chose an IAC school instead.

If that really was true it was not for lacrosse. Sorry WCAC does not have lax scholl's

1. Bullis
2. Prep
3. GZ
4. SJC
5. Damatha


LFG...

Nice Job DMVLAX...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No Merit aid or scholarships in the IAC. Financial aid is based on documentation submitted by families to the school.

The same applies to the WCAC you can get needs-based money which is solely based on financial situations and there must be documentation or academic based which is based on actual grades it all has to be accompanied by documentation and if the grades are no good they get no academic money plain and simple...

I guess some are just bitter that the IAC can't keep up with the WCAC and have to look for excuses

WCAC schools can offer merit money, IAC schools do not. My son was offered $10K a year in merit money for a WCAC school, he chose an IAC school instead.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No Merit aid or scholarships in the IAC. Financial aid is based on documentation submitted by families to the school.

The same applies to the WCAC you can get needs-based money which is solely based on financial situations and there must be documentation or academic based which is based on actual grades it all has to be accompanied by documentation and if the grades are no good they get no academic money plain and simple...

I guess some are just bitter that the IAC can't keep up with the WCAC and have to look for excuses

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:100% Bullis and Prep will be 1 and 2. SJC and Gonzaga will be 3 and 4. I would bet big money.

Looks like I was exactly right and would have won big money!

Anonymous wrote:100% Bullis and Prep will be 1 and 2. SJC and Gonzaga will be 3 and 4. I would bet big money.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That is true. Coach Mitchell wants to win. At all costs.

He’s not the only one.

Anonymous wrote:That is true. Coach Mitchell wants to win. At all costs.

Anonymous wrote:1. Bullis
2. Prep
3. GZ
4. SJC
5. Damatha


LFG...

Nice Job DMVLAX...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Have fun playing St. James, St. Albans, Episcopal and Landon. 🥴"

I'd rather play the teams listed above than play Bishop McNamara, Ireton, O'Connell, Good Counsel, and Saint Mary's Ryken (the bottom half of the WCAC is just bad lacrosse), Wes knows he doesn't have nearly the same squad as he did last year and it shows in their schedule this Spring. Where is McDonogh or Saint Mary's?

Unfortunately those are league teams. I’d say 3 of the 5 would smoke any IAC team in football and 4 of the 5 in basketball. You got to take the good with the bad. What other sports is the IAC good in? Boys field hockey?

This is hilarious. Do better next time. Which three of those WCAC teams would smoke any IAC team in football? Remember, they often play each other and scores are easily found. Nice try though. It certainly sounded like a great post when you were typing it, I'm sure.

Didn’t even know IAC played FB. Lol Have they ever had a team recognized on the national level? Last time I remember seeing any WCAC team playing them was a few years back. Gonzaga destroyed Prep that year. Probably why the WCAC teams don’t waste their time. Little sisters of the poor.

Look, I was responding to a PP who claimed BI, Oconnell, St. Mary's Ryken, McNamara and one other bottom feeder WCAC school would smoke the IAC in football and basketball. The stats don't back that up. Nobody was trying to put the IAC on the same pedestal as the WCAC football powerhouses that have more than 2x the number of boys in the high school. Some IAC schools have less than 300 boys. They still do pretty well against the WCAC second tier. Relax, Gonzaga dad. Relax.

Alrighty mouthy IAC dad. Prove it.

Go look at the scores from last year. And the year(s) before. Surely you can use the internet. Don't be dense.

The days of trying to compare conferences ended years ago. The WCAC allows for athletic scholarships which are not need based and the IAC doesn't (largely upheld now that Bullis has a new president). SJC lacrosse has jumped on that over the last 3 years and created a competition gap. The IAC has stopped scheduling them in general bc of the imbalance and the aggressive nature of their recruiting current students. The WCAC is a National sports conference with compensated athletes and the IAC isn’t. It’s not going to get any better.

WCAC schools do NOT and CANNOT offer athletics scholarships only need-based or academic. That's not saying that they may be able to fit the athletes they recruit into one of those categories but there are requirements such as financials as well as required grades to maintain those scholarships.

100% correct.

As others mentioned it is very rare in lacrosse v football and basketball

SJC lax has been actively giving athletic scholarships for 4 years. The Hawks parents brag about it. Mitchell took a NL player from Bullis to DeMatha mid-semester on full scholarship. The family and the kid brags about it.