Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's time for a federal law protecting women's rights, not a Supreme Court decision. Roe was poorly written and poorly reasoned.
I don't mind constitutional Supreme Court justices. I'm pro-choice. I'm pro a real change that really protects women and a court decision isn't it. We need a federal law.
I say, yes, get rid of Roe v Wade and Gert something real on the books.
Getting rid of Roe before you have a congress that will vote something like that into law is going to harm women.
And if it's just a federal law then it will change the next time a GOP congress comes in. They will repeal it. So we'll have back and forth, back and forth, just like with the money that is given and then taken away to foreign aid organizations that hand out info about or help poor women get abortions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unpopular opinion: most voters won’t care.
What planet are you on?
The planet that elected Trump and all that he begot.
Exactly! Sorry guys, I’m a liberal dem. Used to be deeply involved in abortion rights. But I’m just sick of it. Y’all didn’t make it happen for Hillary. So this is what happens. Wake the F up. Even if you did vote for Hillary…if you’re white…I Fing guarantee you that you have family that voted for Trump. Get your house in order or STFU.
Yeah this is kind of where I’m at too.
YUP. All these idiots who still associate with Trumpers. If you didn’t cut dear old dad out of your life in 2016, I hope they come after your IVF stat.
Troll
Not all the embryos make it. This is on the chopping block.
PP here. And we're going to make sure it is. If you're going to marginalize low income women of color, we'll make sure rich white ladies can't have what they want either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Many millions more care about the opinion. The opinion must be reacted to and the rights it is stripping away must be battled for anew.
You do understand that if this decision is what is ultimately advanced, it does not outlaw abortion, right?
It simply returns the decision to the states.
Perhaps our laws will become more in line with the majority of advanced countries around the globe.... placing limits on when a woman can get an abortion.
What about birth control? IUDs? Are they too abortion-y? Will they be outlawed? What about women not being able to leave the state because they might be pregnant and might be going to a blue state to get an abortion, in the opinion of whatever officer is stopping them at the moment? Will they jail my daughter because they think she's a risk of harm to others - her fetus? What if she has a miscarriage and can't prove she didn't cause it?
We simulataneously try to inhibit the voting access of poor people and pass laws that are going to make abortion more unobtainable.
You are a fool if you think this is just "yay, democracy! Cuz, states rights!" and not a cancer that is going to derail the lives of many women and families. But I guess you won't appreciate that until you or someone you love experiences the impacts first hand.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And no way to leave a comment online or on the phone to that scuzz bucket Roberts. No one gives a hoot about the leak, you moron. You’re presiding over an illegitimate joke of a court.
You are so, so wrong.
Oh, I’m sorry. RWNJs who didn’t care about any of the horrific things Trump did - like put on two justices when he lost the vote and convince a third judge to retire so he could fill a third seat - are currently pretending this is bad.
No one decent cares about the leak. There. Fixed for clarity!
You know what I find totally disgusting?
When you are dissatisfied with a decision of the court, you immediately begin to impugn the integrity of any Justice who does not vote the way you want.
Sorry, Skippy. All of the Justices on the court were legitimately nominated and voted into power.
And, if you want to talk about a Justice being "convinced" to retire.... shall we talk about Justice Breyer?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/01/29/inside-campaign-pressure-justice-stephen-breyer-retire/
You are a real POS to try to defend McConnell et al.
But you didn't answer PP's question....what about Breyer?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Many millions more care about the opinion. The opinion must be reacted to and the rights it is stripping away must be battled for anew.
You do understand that if this decision is what is ultimately advanced, it does not outlaw abortion, right?
It simply returns the decision to the states.
Perhaps our laws will become more in line with the majority of advanced countries around the globe.... placing limits on when a woman can get an abortion.
What about birth control? IUDs? Are they too abortion-y? Will they be outlawed? What about women not being able to leave the state because they might be pregnant and might be going to a blue state to get an abortion, in the opinion of whatever officer is stopping them at the moment? Will they jail my daughter because they think she's a risk of harm to others - her fetus? What if she has a miscarriage and can't prove she didn't cause it?
We simulataneously try to inhibit the voting access of poor people and pass laws that are going to make abortion more unobtainable.
You are a fool if you think this is just "yay, democracy! Cuz, states rights!" and not a cancer that is going to derail the lives of many women and families. But I guess you won't appreciate that until you or someone you love experiences the impacts first hand.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And no way to leave a comment online or on the phone to that scuzz bucket Roberts. No one gives a hoot about the leak, you moron. You’re presiding over an illegitimate joke of a court.
You are so, so wrong.
Oh, I’m sorry. RWNJs who didn’t care about any of the horrific things Trump did - like put on two justices when he lost the vote and convince a third judge to retire so he could fill a third seat - are currently pretending this is bad.
No one decent cares about the leak. There. Fixed for clarity!
You know what I find totally disgusting?
When you are dissatisfied with a decision of the court, you immediately begin to impugn the integrity of any Justice who does not vote the way you want.
Sorry, Skippy. All of the Justices on the court were legitimately nominated and voted into power.
And, if you want to talk about a Justice being "convinced" to retire.... shall we talk about Justice Breyer?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/01/29/inside-campaign-pressure-justice-stephen-breyer-retire/
You don't find it concerning that 3 justices swore under oath during their confirmation hearings that Roe v Wade was settled precedence and have now flipped?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pack the court already. JFC
With the two Republicans pretending to be Democrats Sinema and Manchin, how would you suggest doing this, precisely? With the entire goddan GOP off their effing rockers and unwilling to govern, how do you see this working out?
Oh? You think Congress won't change after this?
No, I don't think Congress will change. Maybe a few seats will be impacted, but nothing on a grand scale. DCUM posters think everyone in the country is thinking like them. That is not the case.
I think you’re in a right wing bubble if you don’t get how many women across America rightly understand this sht opinion to mean that the GOP wants their theocracy at the expense of women.
70% of women on average favor not overturning Roe. 30% of women favor overturning Roe. That's a definitive majority, but not a majority I'm convinced that can impact elections en masse, especially since anti-choice advocates are more politically active than pro-choice advocates.
Up until the last year or two (and elections haven't happened yet after the Texas law was uphold by SCOTUS), there wasn't much reason for pro-choice advocates to be politically active.
Now there is.
This line of thinking is how we got here. The Supreme Court was the ENTIRE PURPOSE of Donald Trump.
Yup. That’s why the religious extremists held their nose to support him.
Yep. Which is why I have ZERO respects for the Catholics that supported him. (Which is all my family and many friends. I grew up in what is essentially a Catholic enclave.) In fact, they disgust me b/c of it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Many millions more care about the opinion. The opinion must be reacted to and the rights it is stripping away must be battled for anew.
You do understand that if this decision is what is ultimately advanced, it does not outlaw abortion, right?
It simply returns the decision to the states.
Perhaps our laws will become more in line with the majority of advanced countries around the globe.... placing limits on when a woman can get an abortion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And no way to leave a comment online or on the phone to that scuzz bucket Roberts. No one gives a hoot about the leak, you moron. You’re presiding over an illegitimate joke of a court.
You are so, so wrong.
Oh, I’m sorry. RWNJs who didn’t care about any of the horrific things Trump did - like put on two justices when he lost the vote and convince a third judge to retire so he could fill a third seat - are currently pretending this is bad.
No one decent cares about the leak. There. Fixed for clarity!
You know what I find totally disgusting?
When you are dissatisfied with a decision of the court, you immediately begin to impugn the integrity of any Justice who does not vote the way you want.
Sorry, Skippy. All of the Justices on the court were legitimately nominated and voted into power.
And, if you want to talk about a Justice being "convinced" to retire.... shall we talk about Justice Breyer?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/01/29/inside-campaign-pressure-justice-stephen-breyer-retire/
You are a real POS to try to defend McConnell et al.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yes. That opinion. (Why do you think your overstatement is helpful? Who do you think it is helpful for?)
For emotionally-charged people like you who are inappropriately drawing sweeping conclusions without proper context or the facts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unpopular opinion: most voters won’t care.
What planet are you on?
The planet that elected Trump and all that he begot.
Exactly! Sorry guys, I’m a liberal dem. Used to be deeply involved in abortion rights. But I’m just sick of it. Y’all didn’t make it happen for Hillary. So this is what happens. Wake the F up. Even if you did vote for Hillary…if you’re white…I Fing guarantee you that you have family that voted for Trump. Get your house in order or STFU.
Yeah this is kind of where I’m at too.
YUP. All these idiots who still associate with Trumpers. If you didn’t cut dear old dad out of your life in 2016, I hope they come after your IVF stat.
Troll
Not all the embryos make it. This is on the chopping block.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yes. That opinion. (Why do you think your overstatement is helpful? Who do you think it is helpful for?)
For emotionally-charged people like you who are inappropriately drawing sweeping conclusions without proper context or the facts.