Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP
I agree with the advice to let it go. That is my plan.
What I am now wondering is:
Was I wrong to be uncomfortable about it?
She was a bit miffed at me for being uncomfortable around it. Is that fair?
Again, thanks everyone.
Nah, man, you’re wrong. She was interviewing your potential replacement. Have some self respect and dump her. Ignore all the DCUM women who say you should be ok with that type of behavior. Hard Next the woman who does not respect you and who is clearly in monkey branch mode.
^I agree with this.
It’s not like there aren’t a ton of other single women out there FFS.
Anonymous wrote:She got asked out on a date that he tried to frame as "not a date" (just wants advice!) and turned it into not-a-date for real (bringing a girlfriend, talking about her boyfriend). I think that your discomfort makes sense but also that you might not understand, as a guy, the layers women have to navigate to keep guys from feeling rejected when you reject them. Their kids are on a team together so she has to see him in the future and if he gets his feelings hurt he could make it extremely uncomfortable. He could badmouth her to other parents, harass her when he sees her, stalk her, get violent, none of it is out of the realm of reality.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Women spend their whole lives figuring out how to gently let men down without making it awkward (or even deadly). Men can be really nasty if you don't, and she has a relationship to maintain here for her daughter's sake.
+1
If that guy doesn't figure out that she's not interested, he's a moron. She took his statements at face value (he wanted her advice on dating) as a way to let him down easy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you would have been cool with your boyfriend going on a date with another woman to talk about dating?
If I was dating a dad and someone he knew through his kid's activities asked him out on a "this is not a date" pretense and he outmaneuvered her like this, brought a person to turn it into not a date, talked about how happy he was with me, and told me the whole thing I would be fine with it.
Wow. Outmaneuvered? But why? Why go through all that when he could just say no thanks?
He certainly could, which is why "what's if it was opposite day" is a bad premise. But I didn't create the premise. Why women have to tread more lightly with men has been explained by 8 different people, but there are none so blind as them that will not see.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP
I agree with the advice to let it go. That is my plan.
What I am now wondering is:
Was I wrong to be uncomfortable about it?
She was a bit miffed at me for being uncomfortable around it. Is that fair?
Again, thanks everyone.
All uncomfortable feelings may be directed at him, not her. He put her in a tough spot and she expertly navigated out of it.
Anonymous wrote:OP
I agree with the advice to let it go. That is my plan.
What I am now wondering is:
Was I wrong to be uncomfortable about it?
She was a bit miffed at me for being uncomfortable around it. Is that fair?
Again, thanks everyone.
Why women have to tread more lightly with men has been explained by 8 different people, but there are none so blind as them that will not see.
I think bringing OP would have been a ridiculous move. She knows this guy through her kid, not her social life. The only reason to bring OP would be if she wanted the two of them to fight or for the guy whose kid is on her kid's sports team to be humiliated and hate her. The way she handled it was remarkably clever - didn't box the guy into a corner where his only option was to feel like a total ass while also making it extremely clear she was not going to be accidentally trapped into going on a date with him by his ploy.
You people are so mad that women know how to handle men that you're essentially saying she's a whore for not forcing OP to handle her business for her. It's interesting because the double bind is apparently not enough - you want a triple bind where a woman can't say yes or no and has to say "help!" so that you can turn around and call her helpless or needy or something
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She got asked out on a date that he tried to frame as "not a date" (just wants advice!) and turned it into not-a-date for real (bringing a girlfriend, talking about her boyfriend). I think that your discomfort makes sense but also that you might not understand, as a guy, the layers women have to navigate to keep guys from feeling rejected when you reject them. Their kids are on a team together so she has to see him in the future and if he gets his feelings hurt he could make it extremely uncomfortable. He could badmouth her to other parents, harass her when he sees her, stalk her, get violent, none of it is out of the realm of reality.
Why didn't she bring op?
I think bringing OP would have been a ridiculous move. She knows this guy through her kid, not her social life. The only reason to bring OP would be if she wanted the two of them to fight or for the guy whose kid is on her kid's sports team to be humiliated and hate her. The way she handled it was remarkably clever - didn't box the guy into a corner where his only option was to feel like a total ass while also making it extremely clear she was not going to be accidentally trapped into going on a date with him by his ploy.
You people are so mad that women know how to handle men that you're essentially saying she's a whore for not forcing OP to handle her business for her. It's interesting because the double bind is apparently not enough - you want a triple bind where a woman can't say yes or no and has to say "help!" so that you can turn around and call her helpless or needy or something.
So you would have been cool with your boyfriend going on a date with another woman to talk about dating?
If I was dating a dad and someone he knew through his kid's activities asked him out on a "this is not a date" pretense and he outmaneuvered her like this, brought a person to turn it into not a date, talked about how happy he was with me, and told me the whole thing I would be fine with it.
Wow. Outmaneuvered? But why? Why go through all that when he could just say no thanks?
He certainly could, which is why "what's if it was opposite day" is a bad premise. But I didn't create the premise. Why women have to tread more lightly with men has been explained by 8 different people, but there are none so blind as them that will not see.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She got asked out on a date that he tried to frame as "not a date" (just wants advice!) and turned it into not-a-date for real (bringing a girlfriend, talking about her boyfriend). I think that your discomfort makes sense but also that you might not understand, as a guy, the layers women have to navigate to keep guys from feeling rejected when you reject them. Their kids are on a team together so she has to see him in the future and if he gets his feelings hurt he could make it extremely uncomfortable. He could badmouth her to other parents, harass her when he sees her, stalk her, get violent, none of it is out of the realm of reality.
Why didn't she bring op?
I think bringing OP would have been a ridiculous move. She knows this guy through her kid, not her social life. The only reason to bring OP would be if she wanted the two of them to fight or for the guy whose kid is on her kid's sports team to be humiliated and hate her. The way she handled it was remarkably clever - didn't box the guy into a corner where his only option was to feel like a total ass while also making it extremely clear she was not going to be accidentally trapped into going on a date with him by his ploy.
You people are so mad that women know how to handle men that you're essentially saying she's a whore for not forcing OP to handle her business for her. It's interesting because the double bind is apparently not enough - you want a triple bind where a woman can't say yes or no and has to say "help!" so that you can turn around and call her helpless or needy or something.
So you would have been cool with your boyfriend going on a date with another woman to talk about dating?
If I was dating a dad and someone he knew through his kid's activities asked him out on a "this is not a date" pretense and he outmaneuvered her like this, brought a person to turn it into not a date, talked about how happy he was with me, and told me the whole thing I would be fine with it.
Wow. Outmaneuvered? But why? Why go through all that when he could just say no thanks?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She got asked out on a date that he tried to frame as "not a date" (just wants advice!) and turned it into not-a-date for real (bringing a girlfriend, talking about her boyfriend). I think that your discomfort makes sense but also that you might not understand, as a guy, the layers women have to navigate to keep guys from feeling rejected when you reject them. Their kids are on a team together so she has to see him in the future and if he gets his feelings hurt he could make it extremely uncomfortable. He could badmouth her to other parents, harass her when he sees her, stalk her, get violent, none of it is out of the realm of reality.
Why didn't she bring op?
I think bringing OP would have been a ridiculous move. She knows this guy through her kid, not her social life. The only reason to bring OP would be if she wanted the two of them to fight or for the guy whose kid is on her kid's sports team to be humiliated and hate her. The way she handled it was remarkably clever - didn't box the guy into a corner where his only option was to feel like a total ass while also making it extremely clear she was not going to be accidentally trapped into going on a date with him by his ploy.
You people are so mad that women know how to handle men that you're essentially saying she's a whore for not forcing OP to handle her business for her. It's interesting because the double bind is apparently not enough - you want a triple bind where a woman can't say yes or no and has to say "help!" so that you can turn around and call her helpless or needy or something.
So you would have been cool with your boyfriend going on a date with another woman to talk about dating?
If I was dating a dad and someone he knew through his kid's activities asked him out on a "this is not a date" pretense and he outmaneuvered her like this, brought a person to turn it into not a date, talked about how happy he was with me, and told me the whole thing I would be fine with it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She got asked out on a date that he tried to frame as "not a date" (just wants advice!) and turned it into not-a-date for real (bringing a girlfriend, talking about her boyfriend). I think that your discomfort makes sense but also that you might not understand, as a guy, the layers women have to navigate to keep guys from feeling rejected when you reject them. Their kids are on a team together so she has to see him in the future and if he gets his feelings hurt he could make it extremely uncomfortable. He could badmouth her to other parents, harass her when he sees her, stalk her, get violent, none of it is out of the realm of reality.
Why didn't she bring op?
I think bringing OP would have been a ridiculous move. She knows this guy through her kid, not her social life. The only reason to bring OP would be if she wanted the two of them to fight or for the guy whose kid is on her kid's sports team to be humiliated and hate her. The way she handled it was remarkably clever - didn't box the guy into a corner where his only option was to feel like a total ass while also making it extremely clear she was not going to be accidentally trapped into going on a date with him by his ploy.
You people are so mad that women know how to handle men that you're essentially saying she's a whore for not forcing OP to handle her business for her. It's interesting because the double bind is apparently not enough - you want a triple bind where a woman can't say yes or no and has to say "help!" so that you can turn around and call her helpless or needy or something.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She got asked out on a date that he tried to frame as "not a date" (just wants advice!) and turned it into not-a-date for real (bringing a girlfriend, talking about her boyfriend). I think that your discomfort makes sense but also that you might not understand, as a guy, the layers women have to navigate to keep guys from feeling rejected when you reject them. Their kids are on a team together so she has to see him in the future and if he gets his feelings hurt he could make it extremely uncomfortable. He could badmouth her to other parents, harass her when he sees her, stalk her, get violent, none of it is out of the realm of reality.
Why didn't she bring op?
I think bringing OP would have been a ridiculous move. She knows this guy through her kid, not her social life. The only reason to bring OP would be if she wanted the two of them to fight or for the guy whose kid is on her kid's sports team to be humiliated and hate her. The way she handled it was remarkably clever - didn't box the guy into a corner where his only option was to feel like a total ass while also making it extremely clear she was not going to be accidentally trapped into going on a date with him by his ploy.
You people are so mad that women know how to handle men that you're essentially saying she's a whore for not forcing OP to handle her business for her. It's interesting because the double bind is apparently not enough - you want a triple bind where a woman can't say yes or no and has to say "help!" so that you can turn around and call her helpless or needy or something.
So you would have been cool with your boyfriend going on a date with another woman to talk about dating?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She got asked out on a date that he tried to frame as "not a date" (just wants advice!) and turned it into not-a-date for real (bringing a girlfriend, talking about her boyfriend). I think that your discomfort makes sense but also that you might not understand, as a guy, the layers women have to navigate to keep guys from feeling rejected when you reject them. Their kids are on a team together so she has to see him in the future and if he gets his feelings hurt he could make it extremely uncomfortable. He could badmouth her to other parents, harass her when he sees her, stalk her, get violent, none of it is out of the realm of reality.
Why didn't she bring op?
I think bringing OP would have been a ridiculous move. She knows this guy through her kid, not her social life. The only reason to bring OP would be if she wanted the two of them to fight or for the guy whose kid is on her kid's sports team to be humiliated and hate her. The way she handled it was remarkably clever - didn't box the guy into a corner where his only option was to feel like a total ass while also making it extremely clear she was not going to be accidentally trapped into going on a date with him by his ploy.
You people are so mad that women know how to handle men that you're essentially saying she's a whore for not forcing OP to handle her business for her. It's interesting because the double bind is apparently not enough - you want a triple bind where a woman can't say yes or no and has to say "help!" so that you can turn around and call her helpless or needy or something.