Anonymous wrote:Here's what I'm asking. Does the FBI go on TV and air video clips when they're investigating something? Of course not. Why is the investigation being aired on TV? If the aim is to get facts that aren't readily available, you don't preen and cry on TV. You hunker down and get to work without TV cameras.
Anonymous wrote:What is the point of airing video clips of January 6 on TV if this is a Congressional "investigation?" What does that add to their investigative work? It makes it seem like politically motivated theater.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the expected/desired outcome from this commission? Truly curious... do they do the hearings and then we move on as if nothing happened? What might change?
Accountability for those who planned and executed the coup attempt.
Adjustments to protocols for the DC national guard and Capitol Police
Adjustments to the physical plant to ensure the US Capitol is secure.
Shine light on all of the cockroaches involved.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the point of airing video clips of January 6 on TV if this is a Congressional "investigation?" What does that add to their investigative work? It makes it seem like politically motivated theater.
You probably thought quoting Trump verbatim was unfair, too, right?
"Sure he said that, but that's not what he meant."
"Sure they did that, but they were just peaceful tourists."
Anonymous wrote:I hope Trump supporters see the light with these monsters who stormed the Capitol.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the point of airing video clips of January 6 on TV if this is a Congressional "investigation?" What does that add to their investigative work? It makes it seem like politically motivated theater.
You probably thought quoting Trump verbatim was unfair, too, right?
"Sure he said that, but that's not what he meant."
"Sure they did that, but they were just peaceful tourists."
Anonymous wrote:What is the point of airing video clips of January 6 on TV if this is a Congressional "investigation?" What does that add to their investigative work? It makes it seem like politically motivated theater.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have any members of the GOP who hold elected office, other than Kinzinger and Cheney, responded to the testimony today?
Yep. Over on Fox News rep. Banks ( one of the 2 d bags that Pelosi booted off the committee) he was criticizing the committee for not getting to the bottom of why Nancy Pelosi didn’t protect the Capitol.
Anonymous wrote:Have any members of the GOP who hold elected office, other than Kinzinger and Cheney, responded to the testimony today?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Which reputable person or news agency is live tweeting this? I can’t watch.
If you have the time, I highly recommend watching the reply, or clips.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?513434-1/capitol-dc-police-testify-january-6-attack
The officer's testimony was powerful and several members of Congress choked up. I am so grateful that Pelosi put Cheney and Kinzinger on the committee. I will be recycling Kinzinger's quote when I I hear false equivalency on BUT George Floyd protests. "There is a difference between breaking the law and rejecting the rule of law."
I hope those in mainstream media who said Pelosi made a bad move are eating their words but they lost their moral high ground years ago. There is no "both sidesing."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have any members of the GOP who hold elected office, other than Kinzinger and Cheney, responded to the testimony today?
Yep. Over on Fox News rep. Banks ( one of the 2 d bags that Pelosi booted off the committee) he was criticizing the committee for not getting to the bottom of why Nancy Pelosi didn’t protect the Capitol.
Anonymous wrote:Have any members of the GOP who hold elected office, other than Kinzinger and Cheney, responded to the testimony today?