Anonymous wrote:One reason I find this weird is that I probably could have married a much richer man than I did (as in I had two serious boyfriends, both working at Biglaw firms and both from well off families) and chose not to because I was not into that lifestyle or that level of competitive materialism. Maybe here are wealthy men who aren't like that, but I never found one in DC. I think in order to be willing to do the kind of work (and the kind of hours) that allows you to have that lifestyle, you have to be interested in money and motivated by the idea of having more than others. I wasn't, and left Biglaw and also broke up with those guys when I realized we just had different values. When I met my DH, who works in government and has a very similar approach to work-life balance and finances to me, I was so happy I had held out for someone who felt like the right fit for the kind of life I wanted to lead.
I have friends with rich husbands now, including in Biglaw, and some of them are happy and some are not. They all have more money than I do, and while I occasionally envy their money (mostly around certain trips they can take that we really have to save up for), I feel confident I would not be more happy with their husbands instead of mine. My DH and I sometimes say "Oh, it would be so cool to take a trip like that to South Africa and go on a safari and stay in a luxury resort." But we'd want to do it together, not with whatever rich spouse would enable us to do so easily.
So the idea that marrying rich is an accomplishment is odd to me. Why would settling for someone I don't love as much, who doesn't share my values and doesn't want the same kind of life that I want, have been an accomplishment?
I guess it's an accomplishment if it was your goal and you achieved it. But forgive me if I'm not impressed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We grew up on Disney movies, where the most special girl marries the rich prince.
Also, for most of human history, women couldn’t amass their own wealth, or often even hold good jobs. The best chance for a decent life was marrying someone with money.
+1. I don't think younger generations realize how much movies, music, magazines, and general media/pop culture influenced young girls growing up - particularly for those of us from the 70s, 80s and even 90s. We lived through decades with wall to wall coverage of teen/young girls who's only goal was to bag the football quarterback, some Prince Charming or other desirable male character. That does a number on the psyche. I mean, how many girls grew up with low self esteem or warped body images because of the exact same media? That takes decades of unlearning, counseling and introspection. You don't think that the idea that woman are worth more than just the husband that they land needs time to unravel, as well? I cannot rewatch the Little Mermaids, Snow Whites, Sleeping Beauty, etc. that I must've watched a 10000x as a young kid. Luckily, I had parents who were very big on education. I went to law school. Travelled and worked around the world. However, I remained unmarried through my 30s mainly due to law and early career years. I felt terrible about myself and was in a state of constant anxiety about my marital status. Because all that education, career, travel, wasn't valued more than being engaged.
I don't think that things have changed all that much today. Yes, media has made huge strides and I'm glad that my daughters don't watch the garbage TV or read the BS magazines that I did, but there is a measure of self-worth still attached to marital status. I think that answers your question, OP.
Marital status is a measure of self-worth and has been for centuries. We need to do better to dismantle that notion with young girls.
Anonymous wrote:If you are a woman who went to college to have fun and has little ambition finding some rich guy to marry is an accomplishment because you will have a life you could not have on your own. However, you may have a lousy marriage because it was about the money. When I was single my GF's and I were all very career focused and doing very well on our own so marrying for money wasn't a necessity. I don't think anyone I know married someone rich - I certainly didn't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Older women 70+ think snagging a rich guy is an accomplishment because it was one of the few things that would work for them.
Most women don't consider this an "accomplishment" any more, but I've observed that in more conservative circles it still is a goal. Women who do this usually are raised to value their looks and body rather than their skills and abilities.
I’m the PP who stated access to resources matters
This has nothing to do with “conservative values” or outdated notions, and isn’t antifeminist - it just makes sense.
All else being equal, your (and your children) will have opportunities and experiences inaccessible to those without means; that is a fact. There is well-documented gender inequity in society and the workplace, as well as motherhood penalties that women experience with regard to their careers. Money is a top reason for divorce. I could go on.
If anything, marrying only for love is pretty stupid. There’s a lot more than lovability that makes someone a good spouse and family person, and their ability to amass resources for the family unit is one of their most valuable contributions, logically speaking.
You are a twit. Intellectually stunted. Illogical. Subjugated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would think its evolutionary. Females go after the makes best suited to provide food,stability,protection for offspring. In lions is the strongest, in humans its the richest.
Lol there is not enough rich or upper middle class to go around.
That is kind of the point. If you find one and marry one, it is an "achievement" because there isn't one rich man for every woman to marry. They are top 1%, or even less actually, of men.
Do you consider it an achievement to be a mistress to a wealthy man? Sincere question.
Why would you need to ask this? It isn’t relevant at all