Anonymous
Post 07/31/2021 08:47     Subject: Re:PAVE paying $100 to go to a meeting
Yes , integrity has something to do with the time of night you post. Yes.
Anonymous
Post 07/31/2021 07:42     Subject: Re:PAVE paying $100 to go to a meeting
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don't know what PAVE is, but if we aren't allowed to post unsupported allegations about WTU, it seems only fair that any allegations leveled at another entity should be held to the same standard.


to be fair, I think Jeff would delete some of the posts here if people flagged them. What’s going on is that there are clearly union shills on DCUM posting things like these vague allegations against PAVE, and also flagging for deletion anything that is overly critical of WTU by claiming it’s “false” and “deceptive.” For reasons I don’t fully understand Jeff has decided to affirmatively carry water for these flaggers by deleting anything they don’t like. He’s holding up statements about WTU to an absurd standard.



Well, for what it's worth, he can hold any statement to whatever standard he wants. He owns the site and decides what is and is not allowed.


I realize that. For me it has been important to have that point made clear.


You were able to come down from your soapbox to chime in that the anonymous message board you post on at 11:30 at night doesn’t have the integrity you thought it does. Thank goodness
Anonymous
Post 07/30/2021 23:28     Subject: Re:PAVE paying $100 to go to a meeting
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don't know what PAVE is, but if we aren't allowed to post unsupported allegations about WTU, it seems only fair that any allegations leveled at another entity should be held to the same standard.


to be fair, I think Jeff would delete some of the posts here if people flagged them. What’s going on is that there are clearly union shills on DCUM posting things like these vague allegations against PAVE, and also flagging for deletion anything that is overly critical of WTU by claiming it’s “false” and “deceptive.” For reasons I don’t fully understand Jeff has decided to affirmatively carry water for these flaggers by deleting anything they don’t like. He’s holding up statements about WTU to an absurd standard.



Well, for what it's worth, he can hold any statement to whatever standard he wants. He owns the site and decides what is and is not allowed.


I realize that. For me it has been important to have that point made clear.
Anonymous
Post 07/30/2021 23:27     Subject: Re:PAVE paying $100 to go to a meeting
Anonymous wrote:What untrue things are people saying about PAVE? Is it not funded by the Waltons? Are the Waltons not anti-union and pro-charter?


Please show me evidence that they are trying to destroy the public school system, as claimed.