Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was born here and could give two figs for statehood. It's a totally drummed up hipster cause.
You don’t care that 700,000 Americans have zero say in Federal matters??
Statehood is long overdue, and creating the State of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth is a way of correcting a historical error
First, these are 700,000 Americans who choose to live where they live; they are not forced to live in DC. Second, the DC Delegate can — among other things — introduce legislation, sit on and vote in committees, and speak on the House floor. To say that DC residents have “zero say in Federal matters” is flat out wrong.
If you wish to have a voting member of Congress and two Senators, you have the freedom to move to any of the 50 states. No one will stop you.
+1. And in a year or two DC will be majority white. Statehood supporters know they will lose their tired racist talking point so they will try, unsuccessfully, to get this done this year. It won’t happen, but not because of Republicans. It won’t happen because a lot of Democratic senators are not going to give up their leverage.
Not to mention, I am very sure that not many Democratic Senators would believe that there are currently two DC politicians worthy of the Senate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was born here and could give two figs for statehood. It's a totally drummed up hipster cause.
You don’t care that 700,000 Americans have zero say in Federal matters??
Statehood is long overdue, and creating the State of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth is a way of correcting a historical error
First, these are 700,000 Americans who choose to live where they live; they are not forced to live in DC. Second, the DC Delegate can — among other things — introduce legislation, sit on and vote in committees, and speak on the House floor. To say that DC residents have “zero say in Federal matters” is flat out wrong.
If you wish to have a voting member of Congress and two Senators, you have the freedom to move to any of the 50 states. No one will stop you.
+1. And in a year or two DC will be majority white. Statehood supporters know they will lose their tired racist talking point so they will try, unsuccessfully, to get this done this year. It won’t happen, but not because of Republicans. It won’t happen because a lot of Democratic senators are not going to give up their leverage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was born here and could give two figs for statehood. It's a totally drummed up hipster cause.
You don’t care that 700,000 Americans have zero say in Federal matters??
Statehood is long overdue, and creating the State of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth is a way of correcting a historical error
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was born here and could give two figs for statehood. It's a totally drummed up hipster cause.
You don’t care that 700,000 Americans have zero say in Federal matters??
Statehood is long overdue, and creating the State of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth is a way of correcting a historical error
First, these are 700,000 Americans who choose to live where they live; they are not forced to live in DC. Second, the DC Delegate can — among other things — introduce legislation, sit on and vote in committees, and speak on the House floor. To say that DC residents have “zero say in Federal matters” is flat out wrong.
If you wish to have a voting member of Congress and two Senators, you have the freedom to move to any of the 50 states. No one will stop you.
Anonymous wrote:I was born here and could give two figs for statehood. It's a totally drummed up hipster cause.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was born here and could give two figs for statehood. It's a totally drummed up hipster cause.
You don’t care that 700,000 Americans have zero say in Federal matters??
Statehood is long overdue, and creating the State of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth is a way of correcting a historical error
First, these are 700,000 Americans who choose to live where they live; they are not forced to live in DC. Second, the DC Delegate can — among other things — introduce legislation, sit on and vote in committees, and speak on the House floor. To say that DC residents have “zero say in Federal matters” is flat out wrong.
If you wish to have a voting member of Congress and two Senators, you have the freedom to move to any of the 50 states. No one will stop you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was born here and could give two figs for statehood. It's a totally drummed up hipster cause.
You don’t care that 700,000 Americans have zero say in Federal matters??
Statehood is long overdue, and creating the State of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth is a way of correcting a historical error
Anonymous wrote:When the District government can't even maintain a simple bridge over I-295, its outrageous that Bowser's people shrug off the extra billions on dollars in recurring costs that statehood would cost Washington DC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was born here and could give two figs for statehood. It's a totally drummed up hipster cause.
You don’t care that 700,000 Americans have zero say in Federal matters??
Statehood is long overdue, and creating the State of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth is a way of correcting a historical error
Anonymous wrote:I was born here and could give two figs for statehood. It's a totally drummed up hipster cause.
Anonymous wrote:In the spirit of offending no one, call it State Number 51. Ol' 51 for the familiar.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We can't even get mail here, not to mention the hot mess that is the DMV, other city services, etc. I guess I'm just not optimistic that things will improve with statehood.
The United States Postal Service is responsible for mail delivery.