Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Democratic party organizations in places like Loudoun and Fairfax are going to find out that many Biden Democrats aren't going to support candidates like McAuliffe (not to mention the local school boards) who have outdone themselves with their pandering and blatant embrace of identity-based politics.

How are “Biden Democrats” not McAuliffe voters? I could see them not voting for Foy, but McAuliffe? Seriously?

Yeah, I'm also a bit baffled about why "Biden Democrats" wouldn't support McAuliffe.

As for "identity-based politics," nobody holds a candle to the Republicans.

In terms of personality, Biden is genuine, and McAuliffe is a phony; in terms of politics, McAuliffe has been directly and shamelessly pandering the left wing of the Democrats whereas Biden, at least personally, continues to strike a more moderate tone.

Youngkin will get a lot of votes from people in the state who traditionally vote for Democratic candidates.

You must not talk to many people who are actually in the left wing.

Agreed. How did he shamelessly pander to the far left, exactly? By supporting gay marriage? By pushing Republican legislators to take up Medicaid expansion made available by the ACA? By supporting background checks to buy guns?

The fact is that he governed as a pragmatic moderate, much like Biden is currently. It's likely that the PP is one of those types that froths at the mouth at the mere mention of anyone remotely associated with the Clintons.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Democratic party organizations in places like Loudoun and Fairfax are going to find out that many Biden Democrats aren't going to support candidates like McAuliffe (not to mention the local school boards) who have outdone themselves with their pandering and blatant embrace of identity-based politics.

How are “Biden Democrats” not McAuliffe voters? I could see them not voting for Foy, but McAuliffe? Seriously?

Yeah, I'm also a bit baffled about why "Biden Democrats" wouldn't support McAuliffe.

As for "identity-based politics," nobody holds a candle to the Republicans.

In terms of personality, Biden is genuine, and McAuliffe is a phony; in terms of politics, McAuliffe has been directly and shamelessly pandering the left wing of the Democrats whereas Biden, at least personally, continues to strike a more moderate tone.

Youngkin will get a lot of votes from people in the state who traditionally vote for Democratic candidates.

You must not talk to many people who are actually in the left wing.

Agreed. How did he shamelessly pander to the far left, exactly? By supporting gay marriage? By pushing Republican legislators to take up Medicaid expansion made available by the ACA? By supporting background checks to buy guns?

The fact is that he governed as a pragmatic moderate, much like Biden is currently. It's likely that the PP is one of those types that froths at the mouth at the mere mention of anyone remotely associated with the Clintons.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Im actually intrigued by the flipping eggs. Because it is not really a food I consider being flipped very often. Pancakes- sure. Burgers - definitely. But eggs? I guess if you are doing them over hard?

Apparently it's a thing Virginians do.

Maybe omelets?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Democratic party organizations in places like Loudoun and Fairfax are going to find out that many Biden Democrats aren't going to support candidates like McAuliffe (not to mention the local school boards) who have outdone themselves with their pandering and blatant embrace of identity-based politics.

How are “Biden Democrats” not McAuliffe voters? I could see them not voting for Foy, but McAuliffe? Seriously?

Yeah, I'm also a bit baffled about why "Biden Democrats" wouldn't support McAuliffe.

As for "identity-based politics," nobody holds a candle to the Republicans.

In terms of personality, Biden is genuine, and McAuliffe is a phony; in terms of politics, McAuliffe has been directly and shamelessly pandering the left wing of the Democrats whereas Biden, at least personally, continues to strike a more moderate tone.

Youngkin will get a lot of votes from people in the state who traditionally vote for Democratic candidates.

You must not talk to many people who are actually in the left wing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was on Fox yesterday defending the teacher on administrative leave refusing to acknowledge trans kids in Loudoun County.

He's all in on the R culture wars

That means he understands proper science and grammar. Good start for a school district.

Now add in that Glenn Youngkin also said he would fire the DOE folks who are destroying advanced math.

Liar. They aren't touching advanced math.

GOP can't win without lying or cheating.

They are touching advanced math. They are getting rid of algebra, geometry, algebra 2 and blending them into other classes. The result will be little to no algebra 2, which means the path to calculus would require outside instruction.

More lies. Schools can offer advanced tracks or acceleration just as they do today. Stop lying.

The path to calculus today requires acceleration or extra classes. That isn’t changing.

Can’t run on an actual issue or platform so you need to manufacture one. Standard GOP.

I didn't say accelerated or advanced tracks. I said advanced math. Schools will not be able to offer algebra 2, except in VA DOE's blended version, and algebra 2 will be missing from this.

If algebra 2 were in it as is claimed, there would be no need for acceleration. You don't even understand what VMPI is doing, and you claim to call others liars for describing it.
There is no acceleration needed to take calculus under VMPI. VMPI is selling its proposal as having a path to calculus available for everyone.

My point is they are wrong about this(likely lying), and the usual path to calculus will be gone.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Democratic party organizations in places like Loudoun and Fairfax are going to find out that many Biden Democrats aren't going to support candidates like McAuliffe (not to mention the local school boards) who have outdone themselves with their pandering and blatant embrace of identity-based politics.

How are “Biden Democrats” not McAuliffe voters? I could see them not voting for Foy, but McAuliffe? Seriously?

Yeah, I'm also a bit baffled about why "Biden Democrats" wouldn't support McAuliffe.

As for "identity-based politics," nobody holds a candle to the Republicans.

In terms of personality, Biden is genuine, and McAuliffe is a phony; in terms of politics, McAuliffe has been directly and shamelessly pandering the left wing of the Democrats whereas Biden, at least personally, continues to strike a more moderate tone.

Youngkin will get a lot of votes from people in the state who traditionally vote for Democratic candidates.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Democratic party organizations in places like Loudoun and Fairfax are going to find out that many Biden Democrats aren't going to support candidates like McAuliffe (not to mention the local school boards) who have outdone themselves with their pandering and blatant embrace of identity-based politics.

How are “Biden Democrats” not McAuliffe voters? I could see them not voting for Foy, but McAuliffe? Seriously?

Yeah, I'm also a bit baffled about why "Biden Democrats" wouldn't support McAuliffe.

As for "identity-based politics," nobody holds a candle to the Republicans.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Democratic party organizations in places like Loudoun and Fairfax are going to find out that many Biden Democrats aren't going to support candidates like McAuliffe (not to mention the local school boards) who have outdone themselves with their pandering and blatant embrace of identity-based politics.

How are “Biden Democrats” not McAuliffe voters? I could see them not voting for Foy, but McAuliffe? Seriously?

Yeah, I'm also a bit baffled about why "Biden Democrats" wouldn't support McAuliffe.

As for "identity-based politics," nobody holds a candle to the Republicans.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Democratic party organizations in places like Loudoun and Fairfax are going to find out that many Biden Democrats aren't going to support candidates like McAuliffe (not to mention the local school boards) who have outdone themselves with their pandering and blatant embrace of identity-based politics.

How are “Biden Democrats” not McAuliffe voters? I could see them not voting for Foy, but McAuliffe? Seriously?

Anonymous wrote:The Democratic party organizations in places like Loudoun and Fairfax are going to find out that many Biden Democrats aren't going to support candidates like McAuliffe (not to mention the local school boards) who have outdone themselves with their pandering and blatant embrace of identity-based politics.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s so interesting that Rs never seem to have to learn a lesson…

Considering what they have and continue to put us through, how anyone can give them their vote to “teach a lesson” to Dems is beyond me

Other than losing the House in 2006, 2018, and two presidential elections in between.
It is true they never had a reckoning over the Iraq War. This is what made it possible for Trump to get away with saying George W Bush knew there were no WMDs and should have been impeached.
Normally that should have been death in a Republican primary, but because they never resolved the issue, Trump was given a pass.

Anonymous wrote:It’s so interesting that Rs never seem to have to learn a lesson…

Considering what they have and continue to put us through, how anyone can give them their vote to “teach a lesson” to Dems is beyond me