Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How old are your own kids?
I do not see the point of parenting AMAs with parents whose kids are not teens yet. Pride goes before a fall and all that. I have way too much experience with teens.
I’m expecting questions about working in a childcare more than parenting I guess. My kids are 5, 3 and 14 months. Don’t expect any questions about parenting, isn’t this board full of them?
Well, I just wouldn't take the answers super seriously, that's all.
I'm around a lot of teens. I can tell a lot about their families, but whether they went to daycare, had a nanny, SAHM, grandmother,.etc? It's irrelevant. When I do find out, it's often a surprise. Or it's some combination, or a few different things, or whatever.
I realize that at the age your kids are, this seems very immediate, of course. But as someone who has done a lot of childcare, and who is also around a lot of teens, I think DCUM obsesses overly much on infant childcare (and not nearly enough on teen care, but that's another story).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you see a different in what kind of parent sends their kid to daycare versus hires a nanny versus stays at home?
Mostly class differences.
In my experience, parents who send their kids to daycare are working class, parents who have a SAHP are middle class and parents with a nanny are upper class.
A lot of the decisions with what to do for childcare depends on income, not wishes or wants, unfortunately.
IME, working class sends to cheap in-home, probably not licensed, or uses "kith and kin" care, middle class sends to daycare centers or SAH, upper class does nannies.
Some of the worst kids I've worked with had nannies in the early years. Often they didn't do well in a group situation, and seemed to have more behavior problems. When you exclaim you have a "nanny" it translates as a poor connotation.
I haven’t had this experience. I imagine, though, it must depend on the quality of care the nanny and daycare are providing and the ages of the kids involved. Individual attention is important and that can be lacking at some daycares.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you see a different in what kind of parent sends their kid to daycare versus hires a nanny versus stays at home?
Mostly class differences.
In my experience, parents who send their kids to daycare are working class, parents who have a SAHP are middle class and parents with a nanny are upper class.
A lot of the decisions with what to do for childcare depends on income, not wishes or wants, unfortunately.
IME, working class sends to cheap in-home, probably not licensed, or uses "kith and kin" care, middle class sends to daycare centers or SAH, upper class does nannies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the best way to find a nanny? I’m due in July and we’d like a college educated nanny with newborn experience for a, hopefully, long term placement?
Our neighbor has a fantastic nanny - educated, mature, and loving - and my neighbors act like they got incredibly lucky and she’s a unicorn. That’s not true, is it?
I’d contact an agency. I found my first job via an agency and me second job was via word of mouth. I would ask your neighbor and I’d ask their nanny. Nannies know good nannies and know who is actually good and who may just be really great at selling themselves.
I’d definitely check as many references as possible. I know many nannies who look great on paper, incredibly educated with good experience but aren’t the best nannies (nothing insidious, just not really great with kids). If you find a nanny that other nannies love, previous employers love and that you meet and engage with a have a solid feeling about it pick them.
There are a lot of great nannies out there and I’ve known many.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you see a different in what kind of parent sends their kid to daycare versus hires a nanny versus stays at home?
Mostly class differences.
In my experience, parents who send their kids to daycare are working class, parents who have a SAHP are middle class and parents with a nanny are upper class.
A lot of the decisions with what to do for childcare depends on income, not wishes or wants, unfortunately.
NP here. I haven’t seen this to be true in my experience, at least not for “upper middle class” or whatever class you’d call well-educated biglaw/consulting/GS15 types in DC. From my experience talking to other working moms coworkers at two biglaw firms and as in house lawyer, plus living in an area full of these types (think North Arlington), it seems like a huge percentage send their kids to incredibly expensive daycare centers. I did as well. While I am sure that the super wealthy hire nannies, I didn’t see a ton of people in this UMC demographic going with a nanny or becoming a SAHM. Unless you’d call people making $200-500,000/year who send their kids to daycare working class, the take above doesn’t fit with what I’ve seen. Plus, what truly working class person could afford infant daycare at a Bright Horizons in downtown DC?
I agree with a PP who said that working class people seem to often use in-home daycares, and it does seem to me that many more middle class people I know moved to become SAHMs.
I’m not convinced that the well-regarded and very expensive daycare where I sent my kids was necessarily the right choice in hindsight, although they seem to be doing perfectly fine in early elementary now, but I do think that this analysis is missing a huge chunk of the DC area population.
+1 We are UMC -- 2 GS-15 Feds, both Biglaw refugees - and we sent our kids to day care. So does/did nearly everyone I know professionally. I was sent to day care myself as a kid, the child of a doctor and a teacher. The only person I know well who had a nanny was my cousin, who makes way less money than we do, but also lives in a much lower cost of living state (Michigan). All my siblings and other cousins used day cares. Most of my neighbors use day cares, at least before covid. I've talked to a few who say they weren't comfortable sending the kids back to day care during covid so they got nannies instead.
The difference is UMC folks can pick really good day cares. Our day care is insanely expensive. Probably still less than a nanny but it's hardly the cut-rate institution a lot of people seem to think of when they think of day care. The other thing is that we had long parental leaves, or at least could take them, even if unpaid. Our agencies didn't pay for leave but they'd let you use your own and then leave without pay. So we saved up when I got pregnant and I took six months off with each kid -- mostly unpaid, doable only because we had planned for it -- and DH took a few weeks too, so we were able to send our kids to day care for the first time at 7 or 8 months old. Which feels much, much different from sending a 3 month old, I am sure. They were sitting up, crawling, interested in other kids, etc.
Anonymous wrote:What’s the best way to find a nanny? I’m due in July and we’d like a college educated nanny with newborn experience for a, hopefully, long term placement?
Our neighbor has a fantastic nanny - educated, mature, and loving - and my neighbors act like they got incredibly lucky and she’s a unicorn. That’s not true, is it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you see a different in what kind of parent sends their kid to daycare versus hires a nanny versus stays at home?
Mostly class differences.
In my experience, parents who send their kids to daycare are working class, parents who have a SAHP are middle class and parents with a nanny are upper class.
A lot of the decisions with what to do for childcare depends on income, not wishes or wants, unfortunately.
NP here. I haven’t seen this to be true in my experience, at least not for “upper middle class” or whatever class you’d call well-educated biglaw/consulting/GS15 types in DC. From my experience talking to other working moms coworkers at two biglaw firms and as in house lawyer, plus living in an area full of these types (think North Arlington), it seems like a huge percentage send their kids to incredibly expensive daycare centers. I did as well. While I am sure that the super wealthy hire nannies, I didn’t see a ton of people in this UMC demographic going with a nanny or becoming a SAHM. Unless you’d call people making $200-500,000/year who send their kids to daycare working class, the take above doesn’t fit with what I’ve seen. Plus, what truly working class person could afford infant daycare at a Bright Horizons in downtown DC?
I agree with a PP who said that working class people seem to often use in-home daycares, and it does seem to me that many more middle class people I know moved to become SAHMs.
I’m not convinced that the well-regarded and very expensive daycare where I sent my kids was necessarily the right choice in hindsight, although they seem to be doing perfectly fine in early elementary now, but I do think that this analysis is missing a huge chunk of the DC area population.
Didn’t get to finish my response.
I have a lot of SAHP friends who did it because it makes the most sense. Decent daycares are still expensive for middle class parents and the idea of leaving a tiny baby in a room full of 3 other tiny babies is difficult.
As far as working or staying home, my wish is that all parents are able to do what works best for them and their families. I know moms who must keep working because that’s their only option who’d prefer to stay at home and I can only imagine how hard that is..
On the flip side, I know moms who know their better parents and people when they can spend their days at work and devout their evenings and weekends to their children. Not everyone is built to stay at home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you see a different in what kind of parent sends their kid to daycare versus hires a nanny versus stays at home?
Mostly class differences.
In my experience, parents who send their kids to daycare are working class, parents who have a SAHP are middle class and parents with a nanny are upper class.
A lot of the decisions with what to do for childcare depends on income, not wishes or wants, unfortunately.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you see a different in what kind of parent sends their kid to daycare versus hires a nanny versus stays at home?
Mostly class differences.
In my experience, parents who send their kids to daycare are working class, parents who have a SAHP are middle class and parents with a nanny are upper class.
A lot of the decisions with what to do for childcare depends on income, not wishes or wants, unfortunately.
While this is true, I do know a number of very well off families that choose daycare because they think it's better. The big selling point in DC is usually language immersion. People who are really into language immersion (and so many rich parents in DC are very, very into it) have options for some Spanish and French language immersion daycares, some of which are extremely fancy with amazing field trips and specialist teachers who come in to do baby/toddler yoga and stuff. These are not typical daycares and they are very pricy, probably more comparable to a full time nanny than most centers.
Obviously lots of wealthy families will also hire nannies who do language immersion, but at that cost level it might just depend on personal preferences. Some people really don't want to have household help, or instance, or really value socialization as others have mentioned.
I do agree that SAHP is the middle class option. We are middle class and I didn't originally plan on SAHMing but like OP, my options were a pretty mediocre daycare that it was hard to imagine leaving a 3 month old baby at, or staying home for a a year or two. We made me being a SAHM for a bit work. A nice daycare or a nanny, or even a nanny share, just weren't in the cards for us financially. It was annoying to me how all our richer friends treated my decision to SAHM as some kind of fundamental belief about child rearing (like I didn't trust others to care for my baby, or had some super traditional view about babies needing to be with their mothers or something). They couldn't understand that it was just the best childcare option available to us, and that everyone usually chooses the highest quality option they can afford.
I’m the OP.
In our area we had only a handful of immersion schools that were competitive and didn’t accept children until 18 months so many chose nannies during infancy and toddlerhood. But immersion schools are very popular.
In my experience families prioritized bilingual/trilingual nannies. I was hired for my first job because I was fluent in French. Upper class parents loved it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you see a different in what kind of parent sends their kid to daycare versus hires a nanny versus stays at home?
Mostly class differences.
In my experience, parents who send their kids to daycare are working class, parents who have a SAHP are middle class and parents with a nanny are upper class.
A lot of the decisions with what to do for childcare depends on income, not wishes or wants, unfortunately.
While this is true, I do know a number of very well off families that choose daycare because they think it's better. The big selling point in DC is usually language immersion. People who are really into language immersion (and so many rich parents in DC are very, very into it) have options for some Spanish and French language immersion daycares, some of which are extremely fancy with amazing field trips and specialist teachers who come in to do baby/toddler yoga and stuff. These are not typical daycares and they are very pricy, probably more comparable to a full time nanny than most centers.
Obviously lots of wealthy families will also hire nannies who do language immersion, but at that cost level it might just depend on personal preferences. Some people really don't want to have household help, or instance, or really value socialization as others have mentioned.
I do agree that SAHP is the middle class option. We are middle class and I didn't originally plan on SAHMing but like OP, my options were a pretty mediocre daycare that it was hard to imagine leaving a 3 month old baby at, or staying home for a a year or two. We made me being a SAHM for a bit work. A nice daycare or a nanny, or even a nanny share, just weren't in the cards for us financially. It was annoying to me how all our richer friends treated my decision to SAHM as some kind of fundamental belief about child rearing (like I didn't trust others to care for my baby, or had some super traditional view about babies needing to be with their mothers or something). They couldn't understand that it was just the best childcare option available to us, and that everyone usually chooses the highest quality option they can afford.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you see a different in what kind of parent sends their kid to daycare versus hires a nanny versus stays at home?
Mostly class differences.
In my experience, parents who send their kids to daycare are working class, parents who have a SAHP are middle class and parents with a nanny are upper class.
A lot of the decisions with what to do for childcare depends on income, not wishes or wants, unfortunately.
Wrong.
We’re very wealthy. Probably wealthier than most people who post here. We both have very demanding, high earning jobs yet our children go to daycare. I’d rather my children be around others and get socialization rather than be raised by some weirdo who wants to raise other people’s kids for a living because they can’t find anyone to have some of their own.