Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anti-federalist trash. Wasn't as horrible as Patrick Henry, but certainly isn't someone to celebrate.
? Now someone is trash for wanting states rights knowing the money was always in the north? Not a fan of our bill of rights? That's fine for you, but many immigrants move here specifically because of them.
Anonymous wrote:For those of you who are saying this doesn't matter. All this takes time and money...time and money away from educating your kids so they can virtue signal. Idiots.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Independence and Freedom are the names of high schools in Loudoun, and Liberty is an elementary school.
People objecting because George Mason owned slaves, would you propose tearing down Mt Rushmore? Washington, and Jefferson were slaveowners, and Lincoln had very negative views of blacks, who wanted to remove them to Africa.
Teddy was considered self-serving for putting himself on the monument, but it looks like he was ahead of his time.
The point made by the school board in Falls Church was that no one is required to go to the Washington Monument or Mt. Rushmore.....it is ok to recognize people with complicated pasts through monuments that people can choose to visit, and often times now there is detailed information about the good and the bad at these places.
However, public school is required. Children are REQUIRED to attend the local school (or pay $$ to go private) and we should not name those places after slaveholders if it makes people feel uncomfortable. There are parents who feel very strongly about sending their child to a school whose namesake could have owned them.
Anonymous wrote:Independence and Freedom are the names of high schools in Loudoun, and Liberty is an elementary school.
People objecting because George Mason owned slaves, would you propose tearing down Mt Rushmore? Washington, and Jefferson were slaveowners, and Lincoln had very negative views of blacks, who wanted to remove them to Africa.
Teddy was considered self-serving for putting himself on the monument, but it looks like he was ahead of his time.
Anonymous wrote:Interesting take on George Mason from GMU's perspective:
https://gmufourthestate.com/2016/10/24/george-mason-and-slavery/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anti-federalist trash. Wasn't as horrible as Patrick Henry, but certainly isn't someone to celebrate.
? Now someone is trash for wanting states rights knowing the money was always in the north? Not a fan of our bill of rights? That's fine for you, but many immigrants move here specifically because of them.
Did he have any ideas about a Bill of Rights for his 100 slaves?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anti-federalist trash. Wasn't as horrible as Patrick Henry, but certainly isn't someone to celebrate.
? Now someone is trash for wanting states rights knowing the money was always in the north? Not a fan of our bill of rights? That's fine for you, but many immigrants move here specifically because of them.
Did he have any ideas about a Bill of Rights for his 100 slaves?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anti-federalist trash. Wasn't as horrible as Patrick Henry, but certainly isn't someone to celebrate.
? Now someone is trash for wanting states rights knowing the money was always in the north? Not a fan of our bill of rights? That's fine for you, but many immigrants move here specifically because of them.