Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean we got pentagon cops gunning down people in Takoma so the less qualified still can find jobs apparently.

gunning down car thieves. Not saying it's justified, but wanetd to correct that for you ^

Yes, because the punishment for trying to break into a car should be death, and an off duty police officer is the judge and jury.

Exactly. He doesn't get to shoot someone for stealing a car (that wasn't even his!) plus the footage of him brandishing a gun earlier this year at a homeless woman in the lobby of the building - this dude was itching for the opportunity to shoot someone.

What should the protocol be for stopping car thieves who are repeat criminals?

Summary execution, I guess.

Are you someone who thinks arresting and releasing is appropriate? Maybe just give them the car?

I think the criminal justice system, while imperfect in many ways, is superior to giving cops a license to shoot nonviolent offenders on sight. I think most Americans would agree.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean we got pentagon cops gunning down people in Takoma so the less qualified still can find jobs apparently.

gunning down car thieves. Not saying it's justified, but wanetd to correct that for you ^

Yes, because the punishment for trying to break into a car should be death, and an off duty police officer is the judge and jury.

Exactly. He doesn't get to shoot someone for stealing a car (that wasn't even his!) plus the footage of him brandishing a gun earlier this year at a homeless woman in the lobby of the building - this dude was itching for the opportunity to shoot someone.

What should the protocol be for stopping car thieves who are repeat criminals?

Well, the Takoma Park chief of police says that, when you see someone who you think is stealing a car, the protocol should be: call 911. So I'll go with that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean we got pentagon cops gunning down people in Takoma so the less qualified still can find jobs apparently.

gunning down car thieves. Not saying it's justified, but wanetd to correct that for you ^

Yes, because the punishment for trying to break into a car should be death, and an off duty police officer is the judge and jury.

Exactly. He doesn't get to shoot someone for stealing a car (that wasn't even his!) plus the footage of him brandishing a gun earlier this year at a homeless woman in the lobby of the building - this dude was itching for the opportunity to shoot someone.

What should the protocol be for stopping car thieves who are repeat criminals?

Summary execution, I guess.

Are you someone who thinks arresting and releasing is appropriate? Maybe just give them the car?

Here's what happens when cops aren't accountable...

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/547551-boston-police-kept-child-molestation-allegations-against-union

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean we got pentagon cops gunning down people in Takoma so the less qualified still can find jobs apparently.

gunning down car thieves. Not saying it's justified, but wanetd to correct that for you ^

See here's another low quality candidate to protect and serve all of us.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean we got pentagon cops gunning down people in Takoma so the less qualified still can find jobs apparently.

gunning down car thieves. Not saying it's justified, but wanetd to correct that for you ^

Yes, because the punishment for trying to break into a car should be death, and an off duty police officer is the judge and jury.

Exactly. He doesn't get to shoot someone for stealing a car (that wasn't even his!) plus the footage of him brandishing a gun earlier this year at a homeless woman in the lobby of the building - this dude was itching for the opportunity to shoot someone.

What should the protocol be for stopping car thieves who are repeat criminals?

Summary execution, I guess.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The disrespect for police officers on this thread is truly disgusting. You all talk about cops as if every single one is a bad seed. There are some very good cops. Don’t be swayed by the agenda of the media and progressives. Maybe some of what they say is true, but much of it is hyperbole and should be viewed with skepticism.

If 99 men meet with one Nazi, there you have 100 Nazis.

Fascinating.

Does this also mean that if 99 democrats meet with one Marxist, you have 100 Marxists?


“No! That’s totally different!!!”

IDK. I mean, I've seen this actually happen with neo-Nazis and the GOP. But I don't know any Marxists.

Every bad cop is covered for by all the cops around him. Those cops don't get a pass because they themselves did not do the bad thing. I should not be surprised by this thinking. You are the same person who thinks that if you didn't say or do the racist thing, you were just in the room and sat silently while it happened, that you aren't also part of the problem. We are doomed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean we got pentagon cops gunning down people in Takoma so the less qualified still can find jobs apparently.

gunning down car thieves. Not saying it's justified, but wanetd to correct that for you ^

Yes, because the punishment for trying to break into a car should be death, and an off duty police officer is the judge and jury.

Exactly. He doesn't get to shoot someone for stealing a car (that wasn't even his!) plus the footage of him brandishing a gun earlier this year at a homeless woman in the lobby of the building - this dude was itching for the opportunity to shoot someone.

What should the protocol be for stopping car thieves who are repeat criminals?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean we got pentagon cops gunning down people in Takoma so the less qualified still can find jobs apparently.

gunning down car thieves. Not saying it's justified, but wanetd to correct that for you ^

Yes, because the punishment for trying to break into a car should be death, and an off duty police officer is the judge and jury.

Exactly. He doesn't get to shoot someone for stealing a car (that wasn't even his!) plus the footage of him brandishing a gun earlier this year at a homeless woman in the lobby of the building - this dude was itching for the opportunity to shoot someone.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it amusing that just 3 short months ago, DCUM was all about “supporting and defending the police against those violent Jan 6 protesters”.... and here we are, 3 months later, and it’s back to laughing at and condemning cops.

Some allies you turned out to be.

One can be allies of good cops, AND want the bad ones to be fired.

+1 AND expect people to obey laws and not engage in criminal behavior.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The disrespect for police officers on this thread is truly disgusting. You all talk about cops as if every single one is a bad seed. There are some very good cops. Don’t be swayed by the agenda of the media and progressives. Maybe some of what they say is true, but much of it is hyperbole and should be viewed with skepticism.

If 99 men meet with one Nazi, there you have 100 Nazis.

Fascinating.

Does this also mean that if 99 democrats meet with one Marxist, you have 100 Marxists?


“No! That’s totally different!!!”

IDK. I mean, I've seen this actually happen with neo-Nazis and the GOP. But I don't know any Marxists.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As long as the "blue wall of silence" is a thing, why shouldn't all of them be lumped together? If good cops will not separate themselves from bad cops, why should anyone else bother to do so?

The union wall of shielding people from discipline is a much bigger problem than any blue wall of silence.

That isn't what the post above was addressing.

The "not all cops" posts are tiresome. That is what the post above was addressing.

Who keeps voting for the psychopath union leaders?

The cops.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you are a non-abusive cop, what piece of this legislation is offensive or frightening?

With specifics, please.

If you're a law-abiding citizen, no worries.

Philando Castile

John Crawford III

Just for starters...

Anonymous wrote:If you are a non-abusive cop, what piece of this legislation is offensive or frightening?

With specifics, please.

If you're a law-abiding citizen, no worries.

If you are a non-abusive cop, what piece of this legislation is offensive or frightening?

With specifics, please.