Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still would like to know what OP’s DC did with respect to EF EA. Some of these schools - Tulane or Emory for example - become exponentially more difficult at RD so they go from being likely to reach.
Emory is not a likely for anyone.
Yes it is for some. So is Harvard, MIT, Stanford.
Unhooked? Nope.
Unhooked, yes. You have to have significant achievements though (obviously).
Significant achievements? Such as? Regeneron = hook.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rejected from Tulane with a 1580?! What in the world.
It’s only out of 1600 right? (The did away with the writing section that they were doing for a while?)
How can a kid with 1580/1600 be rejected from Tulane?!
Yield Protection!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still would like to know what OP’s DC did with respect to EF EA. Some of these schools - Tulane or Emory for example - become exponentially more difficult at RD so they go from being likely to reach.
Emory is not a likely for anyone.
Yes it is for some. So is Harvard, MIT, Stanford.
Unhooked? Nope.
Unhooked, yes. You have to have significant achievements though (obviously).
Anonymous wrote:Rejected from Tulane with a 1580?! What in the world.
It’s only out of 1600 right? (The did away with the writing section that they were doing for a while?)
How can a kid with 1580/1600 be rejected from Tulane?!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still would like to know what OP’s DC did with respect to EF EA. Some of these schools - Tulane or Emory for example - become exponentially more difficult at RD so they go from being likely to reach.
Emory is not a likely for anyone.
Yes it is for some. So is Harvard, MIT, Stanford.
Unhooked? Nope.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How is everyone else doing in his school? Is it the school or there’s something wrong with his application that you haven’t noticed.
This is OP. It has been tough at his school but kids have certainly got in places.
I won’t tell you his entire list in case anyone is reading this and can figure out who he is, but here is a partial.
Waitlist: Case, Tulane, VErmont
Rejected: Northeastern, Vandy, Tulane, Emory
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How is everyone else doing in his school? Is it the school or there’s something wrong with his application that you haven’t noticed.
This is OP. It has been tough at his school but kids have certainly got in places.
I won’t tell you his entire list in case anyone is reading this and can figure out who he is, but here is a partial.
Waitlist: Case, Tulane, VErmont
Rejected: Northeastern, Vandy, Tulane, Emory
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We had this situation. My suggestion is to really work the waitlists and consider hiring a college counselor to coach working the waitlist. He may get a spring admit.
How could a college counselor help work the waitlist? If there is a counselor that has connections at a particular school, then maybe I could see how someone might be able to put a thumb on the scale. Otherwise, I'm not sure how that would work.
That happened at my high school. The college counselors knew the Deans of Admission and could call them up and pull for kids.
Ever heard of Operation Varsity Blues? LOL...
Anonymous wrote:
That's why I despise the American college exceptionalism.
Everywhere else, students are accepted on academic merit, with thresholds for grades and/or exams, which universities tweak for international students with different high school systems.
This makes the most sense, because universities remain places of higher learning, and judging based on extra-curriculars that don't have standardized norms makes comparing students impossible.
So at least in other countries, you know where you are. You're not messed around and have hopes dashed after waiting for months. As soon as you know your exam results, you also know where you're getting in.