Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ignore. Walk a different way.
Should we then also just ignore public drunkenness? What's the difference between someone rolling on the floor because they're drunk or high? This isn't about whether someone should go to jail or not, but having basic respect for your fellow members of society and keeping our cities from becoming a total mess.
Anonymous wrote:Thisx1000Anonymous wrote:Whatever. It's fantastic that you don't have any real problems outside this annoyance. Count yourself blessed and be grateful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whatever. It's fantastic that you don't have any real problems outside this annoyance. Count yourself blessed and be grateful.
So what if a neighbor brought their dog by your house to poop on your doorstep? Would you also just count that as your daily blessing and gratefully scoop their poop?
Anonymous wrote:Whatever. It's fantastic that you don't have any real problems outside this annoyance. Count yourself blessed and be grateful.
Why smoke at all when there are so many other ways to ingest marijuana (edibles come to mind)? Unless it's the smoking itself that's the addiction and the substance doesn't matter. AFAIK, the law says that you can grow a small amount of weed at home and not go to jail for it, not that you can smoke it in public places. This being DC, of course, the police and the mayor don't care beyond optics so the latter part of my last sentence will never, ever be enforced.
Thisx1000Anonymous wrote:Whatever. It's fantastic that you don't have any real problems outside this annoyance. Count yourself blessed and be grateful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hate public weed smoking and would be mad if this was going on near my kid's school. I just shamed my neighbors about it. Take that crap inside. Yep, I'm Weed Karen. And I'm happy about it.
That being said, if he's close to the school and it's a drug free school zone, I'd ask the cops to say something to him.
Why do we want a populace that's all drugged up and high all the time?
We prefer one that is locked up?
DP. This is not the issue and you know it. No one is suggesting that public weed smokers get locked up. I and the other PPs are simply saying that the person shouldn't be doing it at a bus stop near a school or anywhere else in public for that matter.
People seem to think they can smoke weed wherever they want now that it's been decriminalized. That's not how this works.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When I voted to decriminalize marijuana I thought it would lead to people smoking in private, just how you might enjoy a beer on your back porch after a long day of work. Instead you can smell it everywhere now: on sidewalks, on playgrounds, behind the wheel...
You thought there'd be no aroma in a densely populated city?
No, some pothead blowing smoke right in my kid's face at the bus stop on the way to school was not part of the bargain.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:keep em high, drunk , and uneducated.
And easily controlled.
This. I feel like part of the reason politicians are promoting recreational weed is to make the populace too languid to dissent.
Pretty sure we have learned in the past 15 years that talk radio and cable news are much more powerful means of controlling the populace.