Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Y'all keep insisting you're not pearl clutchers. Newsflash: yes, you are.
Because I don’t want to walk my 3 year old to school past sh*t-laden alleyways and a couple that is obviously nodding out on opioids? Okay. You can have dupont then because I’m leaving.
None of what you're describing is going to hurt your precious little snowflake. Check your privilege.
Did you know that even poor, black locals don’t want to live like that either?
God, right?? Where do liberals get the idea that Black people are ok with this???
So outrageous. Smug, condescending liberals insisting that black people want piles of human turd everywhere with no police to help them if they are assaulted or robbed by roving drug addicts. Insanity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Y'all keep insisting you're not pearl clutchers. Newsflash: yes, you are.
Because I don’t want to walk my 3 year old to school past sh*t-laden alleyways and a couple that is obviously nodding out on opioids? Okay. You can have dupont then because I’m leaving.
None of what you're describing is going to hurt your precious little snowflake. Check your privilege.
Did you know that even poor, black locals don’t want to live like that either?
God, right?? Where do liberals get the idea that Black people are ok with this???
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Y'all keep insisting you're not pearl clutchers. Newsflash: yes, you are.
Because I don’t want to walk my 3 year old to school past sh*t-laden alleyways and a couple that is obviously nodding out on opioids? Okay. You can have dupont then because I’m leaving.
DC welcomes public defecation and vagrancy so maybe it's the parents of toddlers that don't belong there. I believe people started getting those diseases from inhaling defecation up there in NOMA which finally got Bowser to clear out an encampment.
Oh I WISH the NOMA encampments would be cleared out. Instead, we've decided to cede public space to hundreds of tents, effectively cutting off the neighborhood east of the underpass/tracks from the Metro Station and everything west of the tracks. And you can't say anything about it without people shaming you for talking about "unhoused neighbors" who are also "residents" of the community. Whatever.
I think the city should designate a plot of industrial land as an official encampment zone. Put toilet facilities there, and staff it with a permanent presence of social workers, janitors, and police to keep cleanliness and peace. It would be the ONLY place in the city people are allowed to live in tents. Every other street encampment would be removed, daily, without exception.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unpopular view, but the first step would be to start calling “unhoused persons” bums, and overdosing “members of the community” addicts. You should be burning up the police call in number and the ones for the Mayor and council members. These things happen because they’re allowed to.
What do you think the police would do? Loitering isn't a crime. Trespassing is only a crime if the property owner wants the person to leave. By the time someone's overdosed they're not in possession of the drugs anymore.
Public camping is unlawful. So is littering. So is public “elimination.” So is aggressive panhandling. So is incommoding the public way. So are disorderly conduct, assault and resisting arrest, all of which are a not infrequent result of contact between police and drug addicts, particularly when as often is the case the individual in question has one or more outstanding warrants.
The police do nothing because they are not told to do something by their superiors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Y'all keep insisting you're not pearl clutchers. Newsflash: yes, you are.
Because I don’t want to walk my 3 year old to school past sh*t-laden alleyways and a couple that is obviously nodding out on opioids? Okay. You can have dupont then because I’m leaving.
DC welcomes public defecation and vagrancy so maybe it's the parents of toddlers that don't belong there. I believe people started getting those diseases from inhaling defecation up there in NOMA which finally got Bowser to clear out an encampment.
Oh I WISH the NOMA encampments would be cleared out. Instead, we've decided to cede public space to hundreds of tents, effectively cutting off the neighborhood east of the underpass/tracks from the Metro Station and everything west of the tracks. And you can't say anything about it without people shaming you for talking about "unhoused neighbors" who are also "residents" of the community. Whatever.
I think the city should designate a plot of industrial land as an official encampment zone. Put toilet facilities there, and staff it with a permanent presence of social workers, janitors, and police to keep cleanliness and peace. It would be the ONLY place in the city people are allowed to live in tents. Every other street encampment would be removed, daily, without exception.
Yep!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ they literally have buses pick homeless up from shelters and carry them to libraries sometimes. Just sad.
Agreed. And it's also part of the reason libraries haven't reopened.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Y'all keep insisting you're not pearl clutchers. Newsflash: yes, you are.
Because I don’t want to walk my 3 year old to school past sh*t-laden alleyways and a couple that is obviously nodding out on opioids? Okay. You can have dupont then because I’m leaving.
DC welcomes public defecation and vagrancy so maybe it's the parents of toddlers that don't belong there. I believe people started getting those diseases from inhaling defecation up there in NOMA which finally got Bowser to clear out an encampment.
Oh I WISH the NOMA encampments would be cleared out. Instead, we've decided to cede public space to hundreds of tents, effectively cutting off the neighborhood east of the underpass/tracks from the Metro Station and everything west of the tracks. And you can't say anything about it without people shaming you for talking about "unhoused neighbors" who are also "residents" of the community. Whatever.
I think the city should designate a plot of industrial land as an official encampment zone. Put toilet facilities there, and staff it with a permanent presence of social workers, janitors, and police to keep cleanliness and peace. It would be the ONLY place in the city people are allowed to live in tents. Every other street encampment would be removed, daily, without exception.
Anonymous wrote:Unpopular view, but the first step would be to start calling “unhoused persons” bums, and overdosing “members of the community” addicts. You should be burning up the police call in number and the ones for the Mayor and council members. These things happen because they’re allowed to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Y'all keep insisting you're not pearl clutchers. Newsflash: yes, you are.
Because I don’t want to walk my 3 year old to school past sh*t-laden alleyways and a couple that is obviously nodding out on opioids? Okay. You can have dupont then because I’m leaving.
None of what you're describing is going to hurt your precious little snowflake. Check your privilege.
Did you know that even poor, black locals don’t want to live like that either?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Y'all keep insisting you're not pearl clutchers. Newsflash: yes, you are.
Because I don’t want to walk my 3 year old to school past sh*t-laden alleyways and a couple that is obviously nodding out on opioids? Okay. You can have dupont then because I’m leaving.
None of what you're describing is going to hurt your precious little snowflake. Check your privilege.
It isn't? Because if the 3 year old runs ahead of you for 1 minute, a lot could happen. You want your 3 year old with this? I doubt it. Isn't your chid precious too?
Maybe you're saying you've got bigger problems because you are worried your 3 year old will get shot -- but guns tend to come with heavy drugs, so it isn't unrelated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Y'all keep insisting you're not pearl clutchers. Newsflash: yes, you are.
Because I don’t want to walk my 3 year old to school past sh*t-laden alleyways and a couple that is obviously nodding out on opioids? Okay. You can have dupont then because I’m leaving.
None of what you're describing is going to hurt your precious little snowflake. Check your privilege.
Anonymous wrote:Mayor bowser needs to go. She has been running the city into the ground. They are not enforcing anything anymore.