Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hourly employees cannot accrue compensatory tme because to many cheap employers like you never allow them to take their compensatory time off. As you are so outraged about then you or your DH should quit our jobs and stay home and take care of your own children. Otherwise, shut up.
Geez! NP here. Do you have to be so obnoxious? It’s annoying to everyone reading this thread. If you are so offended then take your nastiness elsewhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I will preface this saying I do not have a nanny, but here are my thoughts. If she misses a day of work due to snow, why would you pay her for that day? It seems to me, she should either use a vacation day or take it unpaid.
Employers of nanny’s shouldn’t be so cheap to complain about paying a snow days.
There are lots of employees who don't get paid if they make the choice not to show up for work. Why are nannies different? If I don't want to go to work on a snowy day and my company has not made the call to be closed, I have to take a day of leave. Why is it "cheap" not to pay someone for work they didn't do?
It’s a racket.
The nannies on this thread can think of no valid reason why they demand to be paid when they don’t work, so they resort to name-calling.
Glad the kids have aged out of the need a bitfor child care.
Anonymous wrote:How many days does it snow a year where this six page discussion is relevant? Are some of you transplants to.AK?
Anonymous wrote:I always feel like we are kind of getting screwed in this situation too.
We typically need 45-48 hours of care per week.
When we go on vacation or there’s a snow day or even if our nanny takes the week off, we still pay her, but I don’t feel I should have to pay the 5-8 hours of overtime (and if I do, I don’t feel it should be at time and a half). I feel it should be her rate based on a 40 hour week.
Same with when there’s a holiday. Like I’m happy to pay for major holidays, but let’s say Monday is the 4th of July and then she works tues-Friday that week, but it only comes out to 32 hours because it’s a lighter week than normal and she was off on Monday. Why do I have to pay her the same as if she worked a 48 hour week? Why do I still have to pay for 5-8 hours of overtime? I feel I should only have to pay for a 40 hour week.
Our nanny seems to feel like she is entitled to the exact same pay, 52 weeks of the year, regardless of what’s actually happening snd if I try to cut it back based on the above, she gets upset and confused.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PS how many employers posting here would take a job that involves being paid only when you are needed and that is at the employer's discretion? If you get paid 4 digits a year maybe. If you get paid 2 digits a year no can do.
You are describing literally every hourly job. Even highly skilled ones, like nursing, are subject to the employer’s needs. If you’re not getting enough hours at your employer, you look for a different employer.