Anonymous wrote:Thanks for the honesty in all of your responses.
I'd like to reiterate that this is really a silver-lining thing for me. I'm not looking to justify a decision of mine or imply any kind of physical superiority. For me, it's been kind of a zen acceptance of my life's journey. I have never been one to buy any argument that something "isn't meant to be," but the things I'd have to struggle with in order to have children have always been such an uphill climb that it's made me wonder if maybe I was put on this earth for other things than being a mother.
I'll add that it's not (at least so far) infertility that's the problem. It's physical and psychological and situational. Something I've been working on with a therapist and a gynecologist but also learning to accept. I'm not even entirely sure of my own sexuality, and it's been something of a pain point in relationships. What I can say is that it just doesn't look like my body is meant to take a lot of penetration, carrying a fetus or pushing out a baby. I've worked on these issues for years but have gradually learned to accept that maybe I should just listen to my body instead of forcing it to do something it really doesn't want to do.
I do believe I'd be missing out on a lot of things without motherhood, but I enjoy seeking out ways to live for and give love others as an aunt and as a lover of animals. Who knows, I could also make a great stepmom. Physically though, I've just been so used to the freedom to be physically active, being a triathlete and outdoorswoman and all that. This is not meant to body shame anyone, but I am very grateful for the fact that I've always been thin. It is liberating to not carry extra weight or ever feel sore or fatigued, to never take any medications, never have joint issues, never have any inflammatory issues or other aches and pains and still be as springy and energetic as I was in my early 20s. I only know one physical state, and to have the stresses on my body from motherood and aging would be so alien to me.
OP
Anonymous wrote:I’m 50 and never was able to have kids. I looked younger than my mom friends for a long time, but menopause is the great equalizer.
I’d adopt if I could do it all over again. The thought of old age without kids is just really sad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've never been pregnant and I was horrified to find that stress incontinence comes with regular old aging.
Maybe. But it comes a whole lot quicker after babies. I can barely do jumping jacks without peeing my pants (after 3 kids).
Anonymous wrote:Yes, your body will look better without kids. Women who say that they look better than ever post-kids would look even better without.
That said, its up to you to maximize those childless benefits. Some moms have gotten their asses kicked during covid with a house full of kids. My daughter and I have butt heads like never before. I workout regularly but it requires enormous effort as a mom. I have to sacrifice elsewhere to do so.
Anonymous wrote:I've never been pregnant and I was horrified to find that stress incontinence comes with regular old aging.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes. Research says having a kid will biologically age you at least 8+years. Understandable.
I think the research is mixed though. Mothers having a live birth after age 40 (spontaneous pregnancies,not fertility treatment assisted live births) are significantly more likely to live to 90. Some of that may be that prior to births they are genetically inherently "younger" and some of it may also be a result of pregnancy and nursing. Having nursed a baby is correlated with lower breast cancer risk (and i think it is increasingly protective the more you do). Pregnancies are associated with lower ovarian cancer risks too I think (the breaks in ovulation decrease cancer risk). Motherhood absolutely has its deeper stressors. But it can be protective as well.
I'm waiting for research on fatherhood and I don't see men being scared with 'cancer' to get them to be dads. The other thing moms don't tend to talk about is how terribles their postures are with the hyperextended necks and muscle strain from carrying their kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes. Research says having a kid will biologically age you at least 8+years. Understandable.
I think the research is mixed though. Mothers having a live birth after age 40 (spontaneous pregnancies,not fertility treatment assisted live births) are significantly more likely to live to 90. Some of that may be that prior to births they are genetically inherently "younger" and some of it may also be a result of pregnancy and nursing. Having nursed a baby is correlated with lower breast cancer risk (and i think it is increasingly protective the more you do). Pregnancies are associated with lower ovarian cancer risks too I think (the breaks in ovulation decrease cancer risk). Motherhood absolutely has its deeper stressors. But it can be protective as well.