Anonymous wrote:I feel like this model may allow for more teacher exceptions to work virtually as there could be assistants and extended day staff in the classrooms to monitor the hybrid learners. There is no reason to now force the teachers back into the classrooms.
Anonymous wrote:I feel like this model may allow for more teacher exceptions to work virtually as there could be assistants and extended day staff in the classrooms to monitor the hybrid learners. There is no reason to now force the teachers back into the classrooms.
Anonymous wrote:Ok. Color me confused, but, how does this line up with the teachers receiving vaccinations? Wasn't ahem, the point of that, so they could safely return to the classroom? Why now this latest concurrent pivot? My ten months of COVID brain is tired. So, apologies if I am missing the obvious, but, I thought that the vaccine prioritization would theoretically help to smooth over the safety in the classroom for teachers concerns............
Anonymous wrote:In the concurrent model, families that chose hybrid that really didn’t intend on sending their kids (if cases were this high) are able to keep them home Since their teacher will be available online to them every day. The same parents have ability to then to send their kids and whenever they feel it is safer since they already taken a “spot” in hybrid. MS parents had already wised up to this.
Anonymous wrote:OPEN SCHOOLS NOW!
*monkey paw curls*
Anonymous wrote:For classes that can't be spaced at 6' distance, you can safely increase the class size by increasing ventilation and using HEPA filters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok. Color me confused, but, how does this line up with the teachers receiving vaccinations? Wasn't ahem, the point of that, so they could safely return to the classroom? Why now this latest concurrent pivot? My ten months of COVID brain is tired. So, apologies if I am missing the obvious, but, I thought that the vaccine prioritization would theoretically help to smooth over the safety in the classroom for teachers concerns............
We don't have enough teachers to cover both virtual and in person because you can only have a certain amount of kids in the building at a time. Nothing to do with vacc.
Can't they adjust and have kids 3 feet apart (wearing masks) instead of 6 feet apart and then have kids there 4 days a week? /quote]
The novel coronavirus and it's mutated, more transmissible strain that will be here soon have conferred on this and said they can't reduce the size of the social distancing that has been deemed effective.
I found there op-ed by an expert on healthy buildings to be helpful. There is nothing magical about 6 feet. Also teachers will be vaccinated and kids are not at high risk of COVID.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/11/12/three-feet-social-distancing-schools-coronavirus/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/11/12/three-feet-social-distancing-schools-coronavirus/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok. Color me confused, but, how does this line up with the teachers receiving vaccinations? Wasn't ahem, the point of that, so they could safely return to the classroom? Why now this latest concurrent pivot? My ten months of COVID brain is tired. So, apologies if I am missing the obvious, but, I thought that the vaccine prioritization would theoretically help to smooth over the safety in the classroom for teachers concerns............
We don't have enough teachers to cover both virtual and in person because you can only have a certain amount of kids in the building at a time. Nothing to do with vacc.
Can't they adjust and have kids 3 feet apart (wearing masks) instead of 6 feet apart and then have kids there 4 days a week? For kids doing DL they could be taught separately by teachers who are not coming back in person. Or at least buy some cameras/tripods and let the teacher move around while the aide monitors Qs from the kids who are still at home. The current plan sounds like a disaster. And if they couldn't hire enough aides, they should pay them more -- that typically fixes that type of problem.
Anonymous wrote:According to AEM, Glebe is also planning concurrent for 2nd graders. I'm not sure if other elementary schools are considering expanding concurrent to even lower grades.