Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To OP: we are an NCS family of color with multiple kids at the school. You should ask the school about this. You may be surprised at how forthcoming they are. They are doing the work to change things in the community. The prior DEI director did a lot to get things started. I've been in some tough conversations the last month that have convinced me the leadership are committed to this. (The post about the old DEI person is baffling to me; my daughter and my family felt welcomed and seen each time we interacted with her. It didn't surprise anyone that she moved on to a leadership role in new york)
The new DEI director was hired at the start of the pandemic and worked 3 months remotely. She worked directly with a small group of kids and faculty over the summer (all remote). She clearly found it to be a different job than she expected, based on her writing. The kids are upset that she left, but I think some of that anger is really at her, for leaving them before she really ever gave it a chance. And some of it is rightly at the school for not changing and recognizing entrenched racism.
Whoever posted about NCS not publicly stating students of color: https://ncs.cathedral.org/about/welcome/quick-facts. 44%.
The link doesn't work.
Anonymous wrote:To OP: we are an NCS family of color with multiple kids at the school. You should ask the school about this. You may be surprised at how forthcoming they are. They are doing the work to change things in the community. The prior DEI director did a lot to get things started. I've been in some tough conversations the last month that have convinced me the leadership are committed to this. (The post about the old DEI person is baffling to me; my daughter and my family felt welcomed and seen each time we interacted with her. It didn't surprise anyone that she moved on to a leadership role in new york)
The new DEI director was hired at the start of the pandemic and worked 3 months remotely. She worked directly with a small group of kids and faculty over the summer (all remote). She clearly found it to be a different job than she expected, based on her writing. The kids are upset that she left, but I think some of that anger is really at her, for leaving them before she really ever gave it a chance. And some of it is rightly at the school for not changing and recognizing entrenched racism.
Whoever posted about NCS not publicly stating students of color: https://ncs.cathedral.org/about/welcome/quick-facts. 44%.
Anonymous wrote:^ Here's an article about the Black at GDS account: https://theaugurbit.com/2020/10/12/through-instagram-account-current-and-former-black-students-offer-scathing-criticism-of-gds-record-on-race/
From that piece: "At the start, Black at GDS received submissions of stories through a Google form, but eventually changed to accepting them in Instagram direct messages to better ensure the anecdotes’ authenticity. The account’s managers censor profanity and occasionally reject outlandish, inauthentic posts."
By their own admission, the account managers in that case took anonymous submissions via a Google form at the outset, like a lot of the other accounts - it was a good move to change to DMs, which are not prone to the same issues. But even they admit that they receive troll submissions and have to use their judgment.
Do I think 75% of the submissions on these accounts are real? Definitely. Are there fake ones mixed in? Absolutely. It's no different than your typical DCUM thread with someone going on about Crimson Commons and the Roster of Aces.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ Here's an article about the Black at GDS account: https://theaugurbit.com/2020/10/12/through-instagram-account-current-and-former-black-students-offer-scathing-criticism-of-gds-record-on-race/
From that piece: "At the start, Black at GDS received submissions of stories through a Google form, but eventually changed to accepting them in Instagram direct messages to better ensure the anecdotes’ authenticity. The account’s managers censor profanity and occasionally reject outlandish, inauthentic posts."
By their own admission, the account managers in that case took anonymous submissions via a Google form at the outset, like a lot of the other accounts - it was a good move to change to DMs, which are not prone to the same issues. But even they admit that they receive troll submissions and have to use their judgment.
Do I think 75% of the submissions on these accounts are real? Definitely. Are there fake ones mixed in? Absolutely. It's no different than your typical DCUM thread with someone going on about Crimson Commons and the Roster of Aces.
This is not about GDS. I don’t know about the NCS posts as I am not familiar with those instances but definitely many of the posts at STA are true and are not written anonymously. Please start a thread about GDS if you would like to discuss that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ Here's an article about the Black at GDS account: https://theaugurbit.com/2020/10/12/through-instagram-account-current-and-former-black-students-offer-scathing-criticism-of-gds-record-on-race/
From that piece: "At the start, Black at GDS received submissions of stories through a Google form, but eventually changed to accepting them in Instagram direct messages to better ensure the anecdotes’ authenticity. The account’s managers censor profanity and occasionally reject outlandish, inauthentic posts."
By their own admission, the account managers in that case took anonymous submissions via a Google form at the outset, like a lot of the other accounts - it was a good move to change to DMs, which are not prone to the same issues. But even they admit that they receive troll submissions and have to use their judgment.
Do I think 75% of the submissions on these accounts are real? Definitely. Are there fake ones mixed in? Absolutely. It's no different than your typical DCUM thread with someone going on about Crimson Commons and the Roster of Aces.
Why are posters posting about GDS and Sidwell on a thread about the Cathedral schools?
Because we're talking about how to interpret the submissions to these Instagram accounts, and a common issue with virtually all of them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ Here's an article about the Black at GDS account: https://theaugurbit.com/2020/10/12/through-instagram-account-current-and-former-black-students-offer-scathing-criticism-of-gds-record-on-race/
From that piece: "At the start, Black at GDS received submissions of stories through a Google form, but eventually changed to accepting them in Instagram direct messages to better ensure the anecdotes’ authenticity. The account’s managers censor profanity and occasionally reject outlandish, inauthentic posts."
By their own admission, the account managers in that case took anonymous submissions via a Google form at the outset, like a lot of the other accounts - it was a good move to change to DMs, which are not prone to the same issues. But even they admit that they receive troll submissions and have to use their judgment.
Do I think 75% of the submissions on these accounts are real? Definitely. Are there fake ones mixed in? Absolutely. It's no different than your typical DCUM thread with someone going on about Crimson Commons and the Roster of Aces.
Why are posters posting about GDS and Sidwell on a thread about the Cathedral schools?
Anonymous wrote:^ Here's an article about the Black at GDS account: https://theaugurbit.com/2020/10/12/through-instagram-account-current-and-former-black-students-offer-scathing-criticism-of-gds-record-on-race/
From that piece: "At the start, Black at GDS received submissions of stories through a Google form, but eventually changed to accepting them in Instagram direct messages to better ensure the anecdotes’ authenticity. The account’s managers censor profanity and occasionally reject outlandish, inauthentic posts."
By their own admission, the account managers in that case took anonymous submissions via a Google form at the outset, like a lot of the other accounts - it was a good move to change to DMs, which are not prone to the same issues. But even they admit that they receive troll submissions and have to use their judgment.
Do I think 75% of the submissions on these accounts are real? Definitely. Are there fake ones mixed in? Absolutely. It's no different than your typical DCUM thread with someone going on about Crimson Commons and the Roster of Aces.
Anonymous wrote:^ Here's an article about the Black at GDS account: https://theaugurbit.com/2020/10/12/through-instagram-account-current-and-former-black-students-offer-scathing-criticism-of-gds-record-on-race/
From that piece: "At the start, Black at GDS received submissions of stories through a Google form, but eventually changed to accepting them in Instagram direct messages to better ensure the anecdotes’ authenticity. The account’s managers censor profanity and occasionally reject outlandish, inauthentic posts."
By their own admission, the account managers in that case took anonymous submissions via a Google form at the outset, like a lot of the other accounts - it was a good move to change to DMs, which are not prone to the same issues. But even they admit that they receive troll submissions and have to use their judgment.
Do I think 75% of the submissions on these accounts are real? Definitely. Are there fake ones mixed in? Absolutely. It's no different than your typical DCUM thread with someone going on about Crimson Commons and the Roster of Aces.
Anonymous wrote:If STA wants to be a kind and diverse place they need to stop preferentially admitting the children of VIPs and those who were born with a silver spoon in their mouth. It's ridiculous, really. They keep wringing their hands and speaking about diversity and kindness and inclusion and then year after year they admit the kids of CEOs and law partners and more recently---of Trump appointees--all from a select number of private schools.
They do so preferentially over equally qualified kids from public and equally qualified kids with parents who are pediatricians and journalists and government lawyers. And then they turn around and wonder, "gee whiz! Whey is our student body so elitist? Why are the boys so unkind?". "Maybe if we had one more diversity chapel we would solve this problem. Yes, let's have one more chapel. That will fix it!".
Giant eye roll.
Anonymous wrote:First, many of the accounts on the IG pages are not even anonymous. Second, many of them are easily corroborated or already known about.
Anonymous wrote:(The post about the old DEI person is baffling to me; my daughter and my family felt welcomed and seen each time we interacted with her. It didn't surprise anyone that she moved on to a leadership role in new york)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would suggest reading through all of these: https://www.instagram.com/blackatsidwellfriends/?hl=en
When you're done, ask yourself if you really believe each of these submissions. If you do, I've got a bridge to sell you.
When you create Instagram accounts that let people submit anonymously (meaning, even the Instagram account doesn't know who is submitting it because it's just through a Google doc: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSddU6JM8MCUpWlT-vQ0D82WOgxoA7M-ut7tBMj6NwtuYYkmSw/viewform), you have a recipe for some fact mixed with some fiction. I have no idea what the motives were of the person who started all these accounts, but they've done nothing except marginalize people with real stories, who are lumped in with the fiction writers having some fun.
Having read this board for years, it's clear that there are people who take perverse enjoyment trolling on DCUM. What makes anyone think they don't do the same thing on these Google doc submissions?
The person running these accounts is irresponsible for making them look authentic when they're even less verified than what's posted on DCUM (which at least has Jeff able to see URLs to police trolling at some level).
NP. The person running these accounts? It’s not one person. It is alums or current students. Sorry to disappoint you but some of the STA stories are true and were known at the time they happened like the holocaust photos incident as well as the racist incidents in the class of 2024 as those came up in the spring. Some were surprising and shocking and sad but I do not have the right to say they are not true especially when other posters commented agreeing they happened with their names attached to comments. I can’t imagine they would lie.