Anonymous wrote:My lacrosse players are boys so I rarely read the girls threads. But when I do, I am always stunned at how angry, petty, and personal they are. I thought boy lacrosse parents were tough, but man these people are nasty. I hope someday to meet this girl Katie just to know what she is like in person.
Question - is all this hostile posting on the girls side coming more from Dads, or from Moms?
Anonymous wrote:Check out lacrosserankings.com from lacrosse magazine. Seems a lot more thought and actual data goes into those rankings. And I imagine that magazine has to at least try to produce reliable results.
Anonymous wrote:
Pride '23 and '24 teams are both better than Capital's teams. Not only winning against competitive teams more often but beating Capital in head-to-head tournament games. Question is, do Stars and other NOVA '25, '26, '27 parents/athletes won't to join a club that is in turmoil because it sent an athlete to UNC 5 years ago or are they looking ahead to what the club will offer their kid when it is critical for them. '22 recruiting problems at Capital will only get worse next year for '23 because they are winning even less than the '22 team did while coaches and staff are offering nothing more. '24 is even worse--expect even Delaware might be a stretch for most of that team.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:US Club lax has Pride 2022 Black in the top ten.....
.... of teams in Virgiinia.
#99 overall. Seems about right as the other 98 likely have a player committed.
Must be good rankings.
Maybe Katie should give refunds to the 2022's for failing them since she didn't give them for COVID....
Pride '23 and '24 teams are both better than Capital's teams. Not only winning against competitive teams more often but beating Capital in head-to-head tournament games. Question is, do Stars and other NOVA '25, '26, '27 parents/athletes won't to join a club that is in turmoil because it sent an athlete to UNC 5 years ago or are they looking ahead to what the club will offer their kid when it is critical for them. '22 recruiting problems at Capital will only get worse next year for '23 because they are winning even less than the '22 team did while coaches and staff are offering nothing more. '24 is even worse--expect even Delaware might be a stretch for most of that team.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The rankings are 95% based on tourney machine. The rest are what teams or tournaments sled report when not using tourney machine. They have thousands of teams ranked between boys and girls. You can always find a game or two that looks out of place because a team either over or under preformed one game. The rankings still use math. They do not care about the 99th ranked girls team in one age group. No agenda for that. What girls club does he own? You never answered.
No idea who runs the site or makes the rank but if MnD'22 is below Capital'22, there is no math involved.
Anonymous wrote:The rankings are 95% based on tourney machine. The rest are what teams or tournaments sled report when not using tourney machine. They have thousands of teams ranked between boys and girls. You can always find a game or two that looks out of place because a team either over or under preformed one game. The rankings still use math. They do not care about the 99th ranked girls team in one age group. No agenda for that. What girls club does he own? You never answered.
Anonymous wrote:US Club lax has Pride 2022 Black in the top ten.....
.... of teams in Virgiinia.
#99 overall. Seems about right as the other 98 likely have a player committed.
Must be good rankings.
Maybe Katie should give refunds to the 2022's for failing them since she didn't give them for COVID....