Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is the Lincoln Party? They need to stand up for Raff. He's the new face of a credible and honest Republican party.

I have no doubt that Graham is a lying sack criminal but Raff shoulda come with some receipts. Raff doesn’t have the gift of blatant BS lying and puffery so he needs an email or voice recording. I do feel sorry for him, his wife has COVID, they’re both getting threatening calls (including on her personal private cell phone) and he’s about the be set loose by the R party. Hopefully things don’t get worse for him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Something to think about: When I first started voting in VA, there was a machine that showed my vote summary after I voted and asked me to accept it or reject it to start over right then and there. Now I feed my paper ballot into a machine, there is no vote summary for me to approve or disapprove, and I have to trust the machine that all is fine.

I program computers for a living. I don’t trust the machine. I know the machine is only as good as the software that’s in it and only as good as those that created the software. If you are further telling me my vote is on a flash drive/card that human beings are handling? Trust goes out the window.

Would you deposit cash in an ATM that just sucked in your money, gave you no feedback on the screen other than accepted, and you had no way to check your account to see where your money went?

Your vote being on a flash drive that can be lost isn't much different than the old style where people could lose paper ballots or find new paper ballots.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Box_13_scandal

GA is doing a FULL HAND RECOUNT. This recount they're doing is not a computer recount.

If they are not looking at ballots, addresses, etc, it’s not a full hand recount.

Again, would you trust a bank to handle your money the way your vote is being handled?

Are you joking around right now? This doesn't even make sense. A recount is a counting of the ballots. They verified the people upon originally accepting the ballots. That's done and over with. You cannot even recreate that at this point because the ballots are not associated with the person that voted afterwards.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Something to think about: When I first started voting in VA, there was a machine that showed my vote summary after I voted and asked me to accept it or reject it to start over right then and there. Now I feed my paper ballot into a machine, there is no vote summary for me to approve or disapprove, and I have to trust the machine that all is fine.

I program computers for a living. I don’t trust the machine. I know the machine is only as good as the software that’s in it and only as good as those that created the software. If you are further telling me my vote is on a flash drive/card that human beings are handling? Trust goes out the window.

Would you deposit cash in an ATM that just sucked in your money, gave you no feedback on the screen other than accepted, and you had no way to check your account to see where your money went?

Your vote being on a flash drive that can be lost isn't much different than the old style where people could lose paper ballots or find new paper ballots.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Box_13_scandal

GA is doing a FULL HAND RECOUNT. This recount they're doing is not a computer recount.

If they are not looking at ballots, addresses, etc, it’s not a full hand recount.

Again, would you trust a bank to handle your money the way your vote is being handled?

Anonymous wrote:2600 votes in Rome GA were not counted at all by the Dominion machines. 70% were for Trump

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Something to think about: When I first started voting in VA, there was a machine that showed my vote summary after I voted and asked me to accept it or reject it to start over right then and there. Now I feed my paper ballot into a machine, there is no vote summary for me to approve or disapprove, and I have to trust the machine that all is fine.

I program computers for a living. I don’t trust the machine. I know the machine is only as good as the software that’s in it and only as good as those that created the software. If you are further telling me my vote is on a flash drive/card that human beings are handling? Trust goes out the window.

Would you deposit cash in an ATM that just sucked in your money, gave you no feedback on the screen other than accepted, and you had no way to check your account to see where your money went?

Ask the GOP, they are the ones who have been insisting on these machines for years. For instance, in Georgia the Democrats were begging for paper ballot while Kemp and the GOP rejected them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Something to think about: When I first started voting in VA, there was a machine that showed my vote summary after I voted and asked me to accept it or reject it to start over right then and there. Now I feed my paper ballot into a machine, there is no vote summary for me to approve or disapprove, and I have to trust the machine that all is fine.

I program computers for a living. I don’t trust the machine. I know the machine is only as good as the software that’s in it and only as good as those that created the software. If you are further telling me my vote is on a flash drive/card that human beings are handling? Trust goes out the window.

Would you deposit cash in an ATM that just sucked in your money, gave you no feedback on the screen other than accepted, and you had no way to check your account to see where your money went?

Your vote being on a flash drive that can be lost isn't much different than the old style where people could lose paper ballots or find new paper ballots.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Box_13_scandal

GA is doing a FULL HAND RECOUNT. This recount they're doing is not a computer recount.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Secretary of State in GA apparently cut a deal with Stacey Abrams that said “we are going to change the way the election is done during Covid”. Problem: This is supposed to be submitted to the General Assembly of GA for approval. It was not, according to Brandon Beach, member of the GA state Senate.

What specific changes were made that had to go to the assembly and didn’t? Show your work.

Anonymous wrote:Something to think about: When I first started voting in VA, there was a machine that showed my vote summary after I voted and asked me to accept it or reject it to start over right then and there. Now I feed my paper ballot into a machine, there is no vote summary for me to approve or disapprove, and I have to trust the machine that all is fine.

I program computers for a living. I don’t trust the machine. I know the machine is only as good as the software that’s in it and only as good as those that created the software. If you are further telling me my vote is on a flash drive/card that human beings are handling? Trust goes out the window.

Would you deposit cash in an ATM that just sucked in your money, gave you no feedback on the screen other than accepted, and you had no way to check your account to see where your money went?

Anonymous wrote:Something to think about: When I first started voting in VA, there was a machine that showed my vote summary after I voted and asked me to accept it or reject it to start over right then and there. Now I feed my paper ballot into a machine, there is no vote summary for me to approve or disapprove, and I have to trust the machine that all is fine.

I program computers for a living. I don’t trust the machine. I know the machine is only as good as the software that’s in it and only as good as those that created the software. If you are further telling me my vote is on a flash drive/card that human beings are handling? Trust goes out the window.

Would you deposit cash in an ATM that just sucked in your money, gave you no feedback on the screen other than accepted, and you had no way to check your account to see where your money went?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Secretary of State in GA apparently cut a deal with Stacey Abrams that said “we are going to change the way the election is done during Covid”. Problem: This is supposed to be submitted to the General Assembly of GA for approval. It was not, according to Brandon Beach, member of the GA state Senate.

Source? And what incentive does the Republican SoS of GA have for cutting a deal with Stacey Abrams, who holds no office, and no power?

Abrams has a lot of power.

Anonymous wrote:Where is the Lincoln Party? They need to stand up for Raff. He's the new face of a credible and honest Republican party.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Secretary of State in GA apparently cut a deal with Stacey Abrams that said “we are going to change the way the election is done during Covid”. Problem: This is supposed to be submitted to the General Assembly of GA for approval. It was not, according to Brandon Beach, member of the GA state Senate.

Source? And what incentive does the Republican SoS of GA have for cutting a deal with Stacey Abrams, who holds no office, and no power?

Anonymous wrote:Secretary of State in GA apparently cut a deal with Stacey Abrams that said “we are going to change the way the election is done during Covid”. Problem: This is supposed to be submitted to the General Assembly of GA for approval. It was not, according to Brandon Beach, member of the GA state Senate.

Anonymous wrote:Secretary of State in GA apparently cut a deal with Stacey Abrams that said “we are going to change the way the election is done during Covid”. Problem: This is supposed to be submitted to the General Assembly of GA for approval. It was not, according to Brandon Beach, member of the GA state Senate.