Anonymous wrote:Any way you tell it or re-tell it, the inevitable question must be: how can the land on which my house sits not be deemed stolen?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any way you tell it or re-tell it, the inevitable question must be: how can the land on which my house sits not be deemed stolen?
This is such a dead end argument. Land changes hands everywhere all the time since the beginning of time. This isn't unique to America.
Yes this. It isn’t racist it is survival of the fittest. Land is only yours if you have the means to keep it. Humans have been “taking” land from one another since the dawn of time, as does every other creature in the animal kingdom.
The above is a serious loser of an argument. Remember the 20th century?
social darwinism -> eugenics -> genocide
This whole exercise is futile. Nobody anywhere is going to give up their land, house, etc to whichever Native American tribe says to have owned it last. And then how can we be sure they were the one and only original habitants? How far back do we need to go and what proof would be needed? I'm not going to spend one second of time on Thanksgiving thinking about any of this. If I did I would end up looking for some Vikings or Normans who stole my ancient ancestors lands demanding some compensation.
Yeah that would be really complicated, but you are the only person on this thread going there. We are discussing how to present more realistic and factual information about the Thanksgiving story.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any way you tell it or re-tell it, the inevitable question must be: how can the land on which my house sits not be deemed stolen?
This is such a dead end argument. Land changes hands everywhere all the time since the beginning of time. This isn't unique to America.
Yes this. It isn’t racist it is survival of the fittest. Land is only yours if you have the means to keep it. Humans have been “taking” land from one another since the dawn of time, as does every other creature in the animal kingdom.
The above is a serious loser of an argument. Remember the 20th century?
social darwinism -> eugenics -> genocide
This whole exercise is futile. Nobody anywhere is going to give up their land, house, etc to whichever Native American tribe says to have owned it last. And then how can we be sure they were the one and only original habitants? How far back do we need to go and what proof would be needed? I'm not going to spend one second of time on Thanksgiving thinking about any of this. If I did I would end up looking for some Vikings or Normans who stole my ancient ancestors lands demanding some compensation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any way you tell it or re-tell it, the inevitable question must be: how can the land on which my house sits not be deemed stolen?
This is such a dead end argument. Land changes hands everywhere all the time since the beginning of time. This isn't unique to America.
Yes this. It isn’t racist it is survival of the fittest. Land is only yours if you have the means to keep it. Humans have been “taking” land from one another since the dawn of time, as does every other creature in the animal kingdom.
The above is a serious loser of an argument. Remember the 20th century?
social darwinism -> eugenics -> genocide
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any way you tell it or re-tell it, the inevitable question must be: how can the land on which my house sits not be deemed stolen?
This is such a dead end argument. Land changes hands everywhere all the time since the beginning of time. This isn't unique to America.
Yes this. It isn’t racist it is survival of the fittest. Land is only yours if you have the means to keep it. Humans have been “taking” land from one another since the dawn of time, as does every other creature in the animal kingdom.
Anonymous wrote:Why? Its history. You are going to pretend it didn't happen?
Anonymous wrote:Any way you tell it or re-tell it, the inevitable question must be: how can the land on which my house sits not be deemed stolen?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any way you tell it or re-tell it, the inevitable question must be: how can the land on which my house sits not be deemed stolen?
This is such a dead end argument. Land changes hands everywhere all the time since the beginning of time. This isn't unique to America.
Anonymous wrote:Any way you tell it or re-tell it, the inevitable question must be: how can the land on which my house sits not be deemed stolen?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any ideas for a book on the origin of Thanksgiving that doesnt contain problematic images/words/themes of the native Americans? (Or of the Pilgrims, I guess, but that seems to be less pervasive.)
Thanks!
As a history professor at GW I'm truly interested in what you consider racist about the retelling of the Thanksgiving story.
Anonymous wrote:Any ideas for a book on the origin of Thanksgiving that doesnt contain problematic images/words/themes of the native Americans? (Or of the Pilgrims, I guess, but that seems to be less pervasive.)
Thanks!
Anonymous wrote:Any ideas for a book on the origin of Thanksgiving that doesnt contain problematic images/words/themes of the native Americans? (Or of the Pilgrims, I guess, but that seems to be less pervasive.)
Thanks!