Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many people do you know personally who
have died of Covid? I know several and I would not put my family at risk - my child can bring Covid home to my husband- or the teachers and staff at risk. It is cruel to do so.
Let’s pray that our country gets it together on a national level to get the virus under control. I am so tired of people blaming the teacher’s union for the failure of Trump.
viral levels are low in DC. Private schools are in session. This is not about Trump.
yes, we have it under control in DC. Stop politicizing science.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many people do you know personally who
have died of Covid? I know several and I would not put my family at risk - my child can bring Covid home to my husband- or the teachers and staff at risk. It is cruel to do so.
Let’s pray that our country gets it together on a national level to get the virus under control. I am so tired of people blaming the teacher’s union for the failure of Trump.
viral levels are low in DC. Private schools are in session. This is not about Trump.
Anonymous wrote:How many people do you know personally who
have died of Covid? I know several and I would not put my family at risk - my child can bring Covid home to my husband- or the teachers and staff at risk. It is cruel to do so.
Let’s pray that our country gets it together on a national level to get the virus under control. I am so tired of people blaming the teacher’s union for the failure of Trump.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I acknowledge that it makes sense that people who have been closest to the trauma are most scared of it.
However, the situation now is much better than in the Spring. It should be the data, not raw fear, that drives the decisions.
And in-person is optional! So let the people who want to go in-person — whatever their color — go. They can work any kinks out the system and show (or not) that in-person okay.
So we are just going to ignore this, yeah? (The rise is being blamed on small gatherings.)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/coronavirus-dc-maryland-virginia/2020/10/14/e831ea96-0e0f-11eb-8074-0e943a91bf08_story.html
Do attendees at the social gatherings wear masks and sit six feet apart? I guarantee you they do not. Really sad they don’t bother to ask.
Will students be wearing masks when they nap? Will they be wearing masks when they eat lunch in their classrooms?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For the record, Two Rivers has made their info quite public and transparent:
https://www.tworiverspcs.org/uploaded/SY_2020-2021_Docs/Copy_of_Q2_COVID_Planning_Update_TR_Famillies_10-14-20_Sharing.pdf
Notice the percentage of white vs brown and black families that feel comfortable coming back to school. And what percentage of teachers feel comfortable coming back to school.
Wow. Now that’s the transparency I want to see at our school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I acknowledge that it makes sense that people who have been closest to the trauma are most scared of it.
However, the situation now is much better than in the Spring. It should be the data, not raw fear, that drives the decisions.
And in-person is optional! So let the people who want to go in-person — whatever their color — go. They can work any kinks out the system and show (or not) that in-person okay.
So we are just going to ignore this, yeah? (The rise is being blamed on small gatherings.)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/coronavirus-dc-maryland-virginia/2020/10/14/e831ea96-0e0f-11eb-8074-0e943a91bf08_story.html
Do attendees at the social gatherings wear masks and sit six feet apart? I guarantee you they do not. Really sad they don’t bother to ask.
Will students be wearing masks when they nap? Will they be wearing masks when they eat lunch in their classrooms?
quit your job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I acknowledge that it makes sense that people who have been closest to the trauma are most scared of it.
However, the situation now is much better than in the Spring. It should be the data, not raw fear, that drives the decisions.
And in-person is optional! So let the people who want to go in-person — whatever their color — go. They can work any kinks out the system and show (or not) that in-person okay.
So we are just going to ignore this, yeah? (The rise is being blamed on small gatherings.)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/coronavirus-dc-maryland-virginia/2020/10/14/e831ea96-0e0f-11eb-8074-0e943a91bf08_story.html
Do attendees at the social gatherings wear masks and sit six feet apart? I guarantee you they do not. Really sad they don’t bother to ask.
Will students be wearing masks when they nap? Will they be wearing masks when they eat lunch in their classrooms?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I acknowledge that it makes sense that people who have been closest to the trauma are most scared of it.
However, the situation now is much better than in the Spring. It should be the data, not raw fear, that drives the decisions.
And in-person is optional! So let the people who want to go in-person — whatever their color — go. They can work any kinks out the system and show (or not) that in-person okay.
So we are just going to ignore this, yeah? (The rise is being blamed on small gatherings.)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/coronavirus-dc-maryland-virginia/2020/10/14/e831ea96-0e0f-11eb-8074-0e943a91bf08_story.html
Do attendees at the social gatherings wear masks and sit six feet apart? I guarantee you they do not. Really sad they don’t bother to ask.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I acknowledge that it makes sense that people who have been closest to the trauma are most scared of it.
However, the situation now is much better than in the Spring. It should be the data, not raw fear, that drives the decisions.
And in-person is optional! So let the people who want to go in-person — whatever their color — go. They can work any kinks out the system and show (or not) that in-person okay.
So we are just going to ignore this, yeah? (The rise is being blamed on small gatherings.)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/coronavirus-dc-maryland-virginia/2020/10/14/e831ea96-0e0f-11eb-8074-0e943a91bf08_story.html
Anonymous wrote:I acknowledge that it makes sense that people who have been closest to the trauma are most scared of it.
However, the situation now is much better than in the Spring. It should be the data, not raw fear, that drives the decisions.
And in-person is optional! So let the people who want to go in-person — whatever their color — go. They can work any kinks out the system and show (or not) that in-person okay.
Anonymous wrote:I acknowledge that it makes sense that people who have been closest to the trauma are most scared of it.
However, the situation now is much better than in the Spring. It should be the data, not raw fear, that drives the decisions.
And in-person is optional! So let the people who want to go in-person — whatever their color — go. They can work any kinks out the system and show (or not) that in-person okay.
Anonymous wrote:For the record, Two Rivers has made their info quite public and transparent:
https://www.tworiverspcs.org/uploaded/SY_2020-2021_Docs/Copy_of_Q2_COVID_Planning_Update_TR_Famillies_10-14-20_Sharing.pdf
Notice the percentage of white vs brown and black families that feel comfortable coming back to school. And what percentage of teachers feel comfortable coming back to school.