Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You used “they” throughout, I assume to disguise your child’s sex. But it matters in that a boy will have a substantially better shot at Amherst than a girl with the same stats. Apply anyway, intellectual and good writer could help.
Weird statement. Source?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am an alum of a selective SLAC, although not Amherst-tier. Let's say Colby-tier. I know first-hand that our need blind college is financially challenged, even with a strong endowment. If they need to send kids home this year, or if this pandemic continues to impact programming into the 2021-2022 academic year, I think need the blind policy might need to be re-evaluated, at least for waitlist candidates.
OMG, why not just say the school. How would anyone possibly identify you on here?
Also, once you get to the Colby-tier, you aren't talking about "selective" schools. Solid, yes.
One data point to support statement: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/colby-college
Anonymous wrote:I am an alum of a selective SLAC, although not Amherst-tier. Let's say Colby-tier. I know first-hand that our need blind college is financially challenged, even with a strong endowment. If they need to send kids home this year, or if this pandemic continues to impact programming into the 2021-2022 academic year, I think need the blind policy might need to be re-evaluated, at least for waitlist candidates.
Anonymous wrote:All of these school see the box on the common app that indicates whether a student is applying for financial aid. Make of that what you will.
Anonymous wrote:All of these school see the box on the common app that indicates whether a student is applying for financial aid. Make of that what you will.