Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DD graduated this spring from Coastal Carolina and was accepted into a competitive grad school with a scholarship based on her GPA. I think CCU gets bad press on this board but my DD thrived there with smaller class sizes and caring professors.
Glad your DD did well there. I think what may be a safety got one kid might be a great fit for another.
Anonymous wrote:For my child, safeties were Oregon State, Lewis and Clark and Sarah Lawrence. All awarded merit, but child ultimately picked a target/reach.
Anonymous wrote:“Elon really values applicants that drink their kool-aid. May look to be a safety based on stats but may not work in practice if it’s a throw away app.”
Can you elaborate? DC can’t visit Elon, but has identified it as a safety they like (based on online tours, etc). Any insight welcome!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Offering another perspective, one of my now adult children transferred from a higher ranked college to a lower tier college for reasons I won't get into. She was doing fine at the higher ranked school, but found that in the lower ranked school, she was one of the most capable students in every class. As a result, she was a more confident and competent student. Feeling better about herself, she connected with her professors in a way she hadn't at the higher ranked school and wound up preferring that experience to the higher ranked, more competitive environment. Every kid is different, and the "best" school for your kid might not be the best for mine. In fact, the one you think is best for your kid, might not be the best for your kid either.
A perfect example of Malcom Gladwell's "big fish in a small pond" scenario. Our DD is interested in some of the "safety" schools mentioned in this thread for that very same reaaon (she also needs some merit aid). She could probably get into a Top 50 (maybe a Top 20) but doesn't need the added pressure.
One of the reasons why US has bee declining for the past few decades.
Anonymous wrote:Some people on this thread are do obnoxious! Calling Georgia a safety school, bashing JMU, ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:Offering another perspective, one of my now adult children transferred from a higher ranked college to a lower tier college for reasons I won't get into. She was doing fine at the higher ranked school, but found that in the lower ranked school, she was one of the most capable students in every class. As a result, she was a more confident and competent student. Feeling better about herself, she connected with her professors in a way she hadn't at the higher ranked school and wound up preferring that experience to the higher ranked, more competitive environment. Every kid is different, and the "best" school for your kid might not be the best for mine. In fact, the one you think is best for your kid, might not be the best for your kid either.
A perfect example of Malcom Gladwell's "big fish in a small pond" scenario. Our DD is interested in some of the "safety" schools mentioned in this thread for that very same reaaon (she also needs some merit aid). She could probably get into a Top 50 (maybe a Top 20) but doesn't need the added pressure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it depends on the kid's stats, ECs etc.
I'm guessing the schools you listed are safeties for everyone because the admissions requirements are low.
I think for the people on this board, regionally, it might be places like James Madison, George Mason, St. Mary's, Towson, U of Del, Penn State - and then some privates.
I doubt PITT is a safety school for most, it is going the way of Case and Michigan anyway, where soon we will see yield protection.
+1
Pitt is more competitive now
Except every kid we know with mediocre grades and an unimpressive resume got in last year.