Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not in 149 WISC-V - all subsections were high
3 new samples (realistic fiction, science oriented writing and math problem solving)
3 recommendation letters
Original submission CogAt 141, 4FO, NNAT 126 (can't remember the exact number)
No words. Beyond frustrated.
Wow. Have you considered consulting an education attorney.
I am just in shock at the moment, so haven't considered anything. Honestly, my daughter should have been admitted the first round and we thought it was a mistake. But now, I don't know what is going on. We also have an older kid in the full-time program, so we have a sense of the process and believe that the full-time AAP will serve my daughter well. Yikes.
This is how Asians feel when they receive rejection letters from colleges/universities. Shocked and frustrated.
I am the poster above. We are Asian-Americans. Didn't want to go there but since you brought it up.
Time to address the elephant in the room - is it possible candidates are being denied (or accepted) based on race?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not in 149 WISC-V - all subsections were high
3 new samples (realistic fiction, science oriented writing and math problem solving)
3 recommendation letters
Original submission CogAt 141, 4FO, NNAT 126 (can't remember the exact number)
No words. Beyond frustrated.
Wow. Have you considered consulting an education attorney.
I am just in shock at the moment, so haven't considered anything. Honestly, my daughter should have been admitted the first round and we thought it was a mistake. But now, I don't know what is going on. We also have an older kid in the full-time program, so we have a sense of the process and believe that the full-time AAP will serve my daughter well. Yikes.
This is how Asians feel when they receive rejection letters from colleges/universities. Shocked and frustrated.
I am the poster above. We are Asian-Americans. Didn't want to go there but since you brought it up.
Time to address the elephant in the room - is it possible candidates are being denied (or accepted) based on race?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not in 149 WISC-V - all subsections were high
3 new samples (realistic fiction, science oriented writing and math problem solving)
3 recommendation letters
Original submission CogAt 141, 4FO, NNAT 126 (can't remember the exact number)
No words. Beyond frustrated.
Wow. Have you considered consulting an education attorney.
I am just in shock at the moment, so haven't considered anything. Honestly, my daughter should have been admitted the first round and we thought it was a mistake. But now, I don't know what is going on. We also have an older kid in the full-time program, so we have a sense of the process and believe that the full-time AAP will serve my daughter well. Yikes.
This is how Asians feel when they receive rejection letters from colleges/universities. Shocked and frustrated.
I am the poster above. We are Asian-Americans. Didn't want to go there but since you brought it up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Maybe they suspect that many of the WISC scores are not legit.
Many of the scores are from GMU, so I doubt they're questioning the legitimacy.
It's more likely that since the AAP equity report identified appeals and outside testing as an avenue only available to the privileged, they're discounting the results in the name of equity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But how can they just go with one teacher's decision and ignore cognitive assessment results? It is frustrating. Any idea if certain schools have max limit and if that is reached they don't consider any further irrespective of kids being advanced or not.
In two schools my kids attended, GBRS input is no tprovided by only their main teacher. Their ART teacher, reading specialist also are involved.
Anonymous wrote:It almost looks like the rejections and acceptances were mixed up
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Maybe they suspect that many of the WISC scores are not legit.
Many of the scores are from GMU, so I doubt they're questioning the legitimacy.
It's more likely that since the AAP equity report identified appeals and outside testing as an avenue only available to the privileged, they're discounting the results in the name of equity.
Anonymous wrote:
Maybe they suspect that many of the WISC scores are not legit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did not get in despite having mildly gifted WISC, 140+. My kid is in 99.6% but this is somehow not good enough for FCPS.
I have a tangebile test score along with other documentation to prove he is eligible. Yet all I received from the school is a generic unqualified letter.
Also why are we providing all those documents explaining every detail providing documents when we get nothing from FCPS.
At least FCPS should show the decency explaining why my kid is not accepted.
It really seems like a colossal screw up this year. I have never seen so many high wisc rejections for appeals. Appeal process is when they usually fix their mistakes.
Maybe they suspect that many of the WISC scores are not legit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did not get in despite having mildly gifted WISC, 140+. My kid is in 99.6% but this is somehow not good enough for FCPS.
I have a tangebile test score along with other documentation to prove he is eligible. Yet all I received from the school is a generic unqualified letter.
Also why are we providing all those documents explaining every detail providing documents when we get nothing from FCPS.
At least FCPS should show the decency explaining why my kid is not accepted.
It really seems like a colossal screw up this year. I have never seen so many high wisc rejections for appeals. Appeal process is when they usually fix their mistakes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did not get in despite having mildly gifted WISC, 140+. My kid is in 99.6% but this is somehow not good enough for FCPS.
I have a tangebile test score along with other documentation to prove he is eligible. Yet all I received from the school is a generic unqualified letter.
Also why are we providing all those documents explaining every detail providing documents when we get nothing from FCPS.
At least FCPS should show the decency explaining why my kid is not accepted.
It really seems like a colossal screw up this year. I have never seen so many high wisc rejections for appeals. Appeal process is when they usually fix their mistakes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did not get in despite having mildly gifted WISC, 140+. My kid is in 99.6% but this is somehow not good enough for FCPS.
I have a tangebile test score along with other documentation to prove he is eligible. Yet all I received from the school is a generic unqualified letter.
Also why are we providing all those documents explaining every detail providing documents when we get nothing from FCPS.
At least FCPS should show the decency explaining why my kid is not accepted.
It really seems like a colossal screw up this year. I have never seen so many high wisc rejections for appeals. Appeal process is when they usually fix their mistakes.
Anonymous wrote:.... meanwhile, my kid's AAP class last year had reading groups for on and below grade level readers. There were kids who scored below 70% or even below 50% on IAAT, which means that they're completely average in math. It all makes no sense.