Anonymous wrote:I agree with Op also.
I am a single mom with a middle school kid. DL is working for my dd and I. Dd is independent and a smart kid. I am supplementing her education paying $40 per hour twice a week at the sylvan learning center. Money is tight, but I got a second job on the weekend to pay tuition. My dd education is very important to me and I work hard to provide.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Clearly it is of no concern to anyone. The kids whose parents can afford private school tuition or to hire a MCPS teacher on LOA for their POD can get education this year. The kids whose parents are educated and SAH/can work from home will get somewhat of an education. The rest will get nothing and noone cares.
The hell do you mean by that?! Somewhat?! FU!
NP. I don’t understand why you took such umbrage to that post. I’m educated, so I can somewhat teach my kids, but I’m not a trained teacher or familiar with pedagogy, so I probably won’t be as effective as a real teacher would be. PP’s comment makes sense to me.
Is it the SAH piece? It seems to reason that families with a SAHP, or parents with very flexible jobs, will have an easier time managing their children’s access to MCPS classes and/or providing their own learning opportunities.
You may not like the reality pointed out in the PP, but it seems logical and hardly something to get really upset about.
If you know these words and understand their meanings, I'm pretty sure you can figure out how to keep your child's brain from turning to mush.
That’s my point. That’s what the PP I first responded to said and I didn’t understand why some other poster took such offense.
So how does a family with two parents who work essential jobs outside the home accomplish this? Both jobs are required to pay the bills, both jobs hours basically 8am-5/6pm. Children are 1st and 2nd grade. New to area with no family to help.
Anonymous wrote:My 4th grader did fine in DL. Yes, there was more review than I liked, but the kids worked hard. That combined with all the supplemental courses she takes definitely kept her busy. She loves writing even more than before!
I am more concerned about the number of kids who went AWOL. I'd say at least 1/3 of her class never attended zoom. That speaks to parents having other priorities, not able to help or not respecting education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This idea that in person school is dramatically better is baffling. Have any of you actually set foot in classrooms when school is in session? Ever noticed those kids who aren’t paying any attention, roaming the hallways, fighting, or sleeping? These are the same kids that are being left behind now. While the motivated kids are the same ones who will succeed now. DL is not the difference maker here.
Have you ever watched even a motivated early elementary school kid try to learn by DL? If so, you wouldn’t be so sanguine about DL.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My 4th grader did fine in DL. Yes, there was more review than I liked, but the kids worked hard. That combined with all the supplemental courses she takes definitely kept her busy. She loves writing even more than before!
I am more concerned about the number of kids who went AWOL. I'd say at least 1/3 of her class never attended zoom. That speaks to parents having other priorities, not able to help or not respecting education.
I really hope you're referring to the priorities of keeping a roof over their family's head, food on the table, contributing to retirement/college funds, paying for life insurance, earning credits for social security, etc. That is what you meant, right?
Anonymous wrote:My 4th grader did fine in DL. Yes, there was more review than I liked, but the kids worked hard. That combined with all the supplemental courses she takes definitely kept her busy. She loves writing even more than before!
I am more concerned about the number of kids who went AWOL. I'd say at least 1/3 of her class never attended zoom. That speaks to parents having other priorities, not able to help or not respecting education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My 4th grader did fine in DL. Yes, there was more review than I liked, but the kids worked hard. That combined with all the supplemental courses she takes definitely kept her busy. She loves writing even more than before!
I am more concerned about the number of kids who went AWOL. I'd say at least 1/3 of her class never attended zoom. That speaks to parents having other priorities, not able to help or not respecting education.
DCUM's gonna DCUM. 1/3 of the kids in the PP's kid's class went AWOL last spring during "distance learning," and the PP's response is not "this is terrible, what can MCPS do so this doesn't happen again?" but rather "their parents are bad parents!"
Yes. You must no be a parent if you don’t know/understand the responsibilities of being a parent. One responsibility is to make sure your DC attends school/class whether it’s in-person or DL.
I am a parent of 3, and my DCs went AWOL the last half of the spring. We are a high income well educated family. DC went AWOL because DL sucks and wasn’t worth it. I also have another DC who is deaf and doesn’t do well on DL platforms like zoom. That DC also went AWOL because it was unhelpful.
Stop acting like DL is an acceptable substitute for in person learning or that parents who opt out don’t care.
Anonymous wrote:What is the point of money if not to live a better life with more? Money is a false construct to control consumption, I have more money so I get better stuff, more stuff and access to stuff poor people don't and it is that simple. No one really wants equity, people just don't want to be preordained losers any longer. Problem is more than 50% of this country are preordained losers but most don't realize it. You will notice 50% is more than any one demographic.
No one wants global equity either where the child labor in Vietnam makes as much as labor in America because then Polo shirts would cost 400$. What people want is White privilege to morph into American privilege so others can enjoy the American wealth ride before it fades under globalism. But White privilege isn't expandable because it has hoarded wealth for so long in so few hands. To expand it national it would require lower consumption across the spectrum and while it might be sustainable for a generation or two with credit, it would not only crush the environment but some other country would have to be exploited. Everyone in the world cant have a house and a bunch of cars with checks for life.
Anonymous wrote:My ES just sent a survey today to ask which students would like to be grouped together in a classroom to facilitate the families hiring a tutor for their kids. Do you really think this is okay? How may lower income people do you think will respond? Next the school will probably suggest which of the teachers are available to be hired for tutors since they have too much time in their hands.
Can we just throw out the hypocrisy and admit equity is of no concern?
Anonymous wrote:I agree with Op also.
I am a single mom with a middle school kid. DL is working for my dd and I. Dd is independent and a smart kid. I am supplementing her education paying $40 per hour twice a week at the sylvan learning center. Money is tight, but I got a second job on the weekend to pay tuition. My dd education is very important to me and I work hard to provide.
Anonymous wrote:Clearly it is of no concern to anyone. The kids whose parents can afford private school tuition or to hire a MCPS teacher on LOA for their POD can get education this year. The kids whose parents are educated and SAH/can work from home will get somewhat of an education. The rest will get nothing and no one cares.