Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect schools will be open this fall as normal. Rightly or wrongly, the world is moving on. By August, I bet coronavirus will not get nearly the same attention is does now.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/10/us/politics/coronavirus-washington-trump.html
This is because it is summer. People are outside a lot more which helps limit the spread. If we look at Fauci’s statements, and the history of the Spanish flu, once the weather gets cooler things will change. Being in a school, let alone a tiny classroom with almost 30 kids, is a recipe for disaster. We don’t all teach young children. My students are 17-18 years old, nothing says they can’t spread the virus like a typical adult.
Summer weather doesn’t last forever. We have to think about the full year, not just right now. Health always always always needs to come first!
Anonymous wrote:I suspect schools will be open this fall as normal. Rightly or wrongly, the world is moving on. By August, I bet coronavirus will not get nearly the same attention is does now.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/10/us/politics/coronavirus-washington-trump.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"The average student could begin the next school year having lost as much as a third of the expected progress from the previous year in reading and half of the expected progress in math...
the average student could fall seven months behind academically, while black and Hispanic students could experience even greater learning losses, equivalent to 10 months for black children and nine months for Latinos, according to an analysis from McKinsey & Company, the consulting group."
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/05/us/coronavirus-education-lost-learning.html
Fall behind who? The imaginary children who stayed in school all year?
Exactly. Schools have been shut down across the country. All these imaginary projections about children “falling behind” an artificial benchmark.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"The average student could begin the next school year having lost as much as a third of the expected progress from the previous year in reading and half of the expected progress in math...
the average student could fall seven months behind academically, while black and Hispanic students could experience even greater learning losses, equivalent to 10 months for black children and nine months for Latinos, according to an analysis from McKinsey & Company, the consulting group."
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/05/us/coronavirus-education-lost-learning.html
Fall behind who? The imaginary children who stayed in school all year?
Anonymous wrote:"The average student could begin the next school year having lost as much as a third of the expected progress from the previous year in reading and half of the expected progress in math...
the average student could fall seven months behind academically, while black and Hispanic students could experience even greater learning losses, equivalent to 10 months for black children and nine months for Latinos, according to an analysis from McKinsey & Company, the consulting group."
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/05/us/coronavirus-education-lost-learning.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cutting PreK at this stage will actually have a horrendous economic effect on the city. School is childcare + school and people haven't made alternative arrangements. Not feasible at this stage.
You already need essentially fulltime childcare. And A/B schedule that anticipates 16 hours per week max of in person schooling means you need quite a lot of childcare to cover the remainder if both parents are working fulltime
I genuinely don’t think most people have planned for part time school and it’s part of the reason that I think it ultimately won’t happen.
So do you think it will ultimately be fully in school or fully distance learning?
I also question if all the pieces can come together for a hybrid plan, and that makes me suspect we may end up starting the year with distance learning.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cutting PreK at this stage will actually have a horrendous economic effect on the city. School is childcare + school and people haven't made alternative arrangements. Not feasible at this stage.
You already need essentially fulltime childcare. And A/B schedule that anticipates 16 hours per week max of in person schooling means you need quite a lot of childcare to cover the remainder if both parents are working fulltime
I genuinely don’t think most people have planned for part time school and it’s part of the reason that I think it ultimately won’t happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cutting PreK at this stage will actually have a horrendous economic effect on the city. School is childcare + school and people haven't made alternative arrangements. Not feasible at this stage.
You already need essentially fulltime childcare. And A/B schedule that anticipates 16 hours per week max of in person schooling means you need quite a lot of childcare to cover the remainder if both parents are working fulltime
I genuinely don’t think most people have planned for part time school and it’s part of the reason that I think it ultimately won’t happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cutting PreK at this stage will actually have a horrendous economic effect on the city. School is childcare + school and people haven't made alternative arrangements. Not feasible at this stage.
You already need essentially fulltime childcare. And A/B schedule that anticipates 16 hours per week max of in person schooling means you need quite a lot of childcare to cover the remainder if both parents are working fulltime
Anonymous wrote:Cutting PreK at this stage will actually have a horrendous economic effect on the city. School is childcare + school and people haven't made alternative arrangements. Not feasible at this stage.