jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you proficient in other languages?
I have studied French and Arabic. I was once conversational in French and pretty good at reading, writing, and speaking Arabic. But I am really bad with languages and can't really do much with either of them now. These days even English is a challenge.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good for you that you play guitar every day. Do you play alone or with others? What style? What equipment?
I play every day but I still suck. I mean I really suck, no joke. But I really like it. I only play alone, a lot of classic rock, some more modern rock, and some blues. A couple of country songs. I have way more guitars than I need or deserve and I am a text book example that equipment doesn't make you a better player. But, I have a Gibson SG, a Gibson Les Paul Faded, a Gibson Explorer (this is my guilty pleasure guitar), a Duesenburg Dropkick Murphys Signature (because I love Dropkick Murphys), a Fender Telecaster, a Fender Stratocaster, and a Taylor acoustic. I have a Bad Cat Black Cat amp, a Roland Blues Cube amp, and a small 5 watt Marshall combo amp. This is a lot of stuff that I don't come anywhere close to doing justice, but it is really my only hobby.
I suck, too. I had to google the explorer - very cool. I have a Taylor acoustic and a strat and a pretty nice fender combo amp. I should really play them more...
Anonymous wrote:This is a website user profile question. Where are the majority of anti Meghan Markle people posting from? I am suspecting that it has to be UK and states/areas that voted for Trump.
Anonymous wrote:When did DCUM begin?
When you founded it, did you intend for this to a full-time job, or did it just evolve?
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have you have been subpoenaed for log data? Could you talk about it of you had been?
We have been subpoenaed several times. I've been told by our lawyer that I shouldn't broadcast the specifics of a subpoena but I can warn the targets so that they can contest the subpoena if they want. The problem is that I normally can't identify the targets in order to warn them because they are always anonymous. Very often we get threats of subpoenas which some people seem to believe will intimidate me. It actually doesn't bother me and I have no problem with people who believe they have been harmed using the legal system to seek remedy. I think it is cheaper and easier if they just contact me to discuss the issue civilly.
We also get lots of threats along the lines of "If you don't remove such and such posts I will sue you." I just laugh at those and, if anything, am even less wiling to remove the content in question.
Thanks, that was fascinating. I have some follow-up questions: Are you typically subpoenaed for all posts from a specific IP? Or are they posts more limited to a subject, such as give me all posts where this IP talked about their kids? Do you have a sense of what sort of cases they are used for? (I imagine divorce?) Do you ever follow the cases to find out what happened?
I always get subpoenaed for the IP address of specific post or posts. I would fight any request for all posts from an address or all posts about some topic. Almost all cases involve defamation.
Just for the record, I have very little tolerance for defamation by anonymous posters -- something I consider cowardly in most circumstances. If someone contacts me about a post they believe to be defamatory, I will normally remove it almost automatically. But most cases I encounter through subpoenas involve more than just DCUM. For instance, someone has defamed someone all over the place and other websites are also getting subpoenaed.
Anonymous wrote:
I-L-L!
I knew I liked you.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have you have been subpoenaed for log data? Could you talk about it of you had been?
We have been subpoenaed several times. I've been told by our lawyer that I shouldn't broadcast the specifics of a subpoena but I can warn the targets so that they can contest the subpoena if they want. The problem is that I normally can't identify the targets in order to warn them because they are always anonymous. Very often we get threats of subpoenas which some people seem to believe will intimidate me. It actually doesn't bother me and I have no problem with people who believe they have been harmed using the legal system to seek remedy. I think it is cheaper and easier if they just contact me to discuss the issue civilly.
We also get lots of threats along the lines of "If you don't remove such and such posts I will sue you." I just laugh at those and, if anything, am even less wiling to remove the content in question.
Thanks, that was fascinating. I have some follow-up questions: Are you typically subpoenaed for all posts from a specific IP? Or are they posts more limited to a subject, such as give me all posts where this IP talked about their kids? Do you have a sense of what sort of cases they are used for? (I imagine divorce?) Do you ever follow the cases to find out what happened?
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jeff - softball question.
What is your educational background? College? Major? Grad school?
(I ask because I really like your writing style - clear and concise and I have a theory...)
Community college -- Associate's degree in arts.
University of Illinois -- Bachelor's degree, major in political science and minor in history.
Georgetown University -- Master of Arts in Arab Studies.
The computer stuff is all self-taught.