Anonymous wrote:Millions of Americans live in multi-generational households. There was a big article about it yesterday. We do as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know many women who are intensely unhappy with being home now, but will probably remain home after this because they feel they have been penalized by their employers for being mothers and by the government for being employed. I feel bad for them because the logistics of surviving SAH do seem to require one adult to act as home manager. There’s no reason that it has to be a woman (unless you are a lesbian couple), but that’s how it seems to be shaking out. Just one more loss for Millennial young women.
This really resonates with me. My job doesn’t care that I have kids. I’m still expected to meet all work demands during set hours, which is challenging with small children. The government offers no assistance because I’m counted as employed. I’m not saying I’m owed anything by either, just that I’m in a position where I feel stretched close to my breaking point. DH has the higher earning job that is even more demanding and doesn’t allow for set blocks where he can watch the kids. He is holding down the fort whenever he can to help me meet my work demands, but if someone’s career is going to take a hit, it will be mine, which is lower paying and has less upward mobility anyway. I don’t really love my job and this experience has made me truly realize how much I am valued by my family and how little my employer cares about me as a human being. So much of my salary goes to covering childcare expenses that it almost doesn’t seem worth it to work. I’m not making any long term decisions during the pandemic. And I’ll probably always work in some capacity. But it’s making me realize life is short and I don’t know if full time work is worth it for me personally. [/I]
I've had the opposite experience. My employer has been amazing and supportive and has gone out of their way to make it work and ensure they retain their valued employees right now.
Anonymous wrote:I know many women who are intensely unhappy with being home now, but will probably remain home after this because they feel they have been penalized by their employers for being mothers and by the government for being employed. I feel bad for them because the logistics of surviving SAH do seem to require one adult to act as home manager. There’s no reason that it has to be a woman (unless you are a lesbian couple), but that’s how it seems to be shaking out. Just one more loss for Millennial young women.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the opposite. I think many moms will continue to be in the workplace and telecommute. I think nannies will be highly prized to come home and take care of the kids. Most UMC people will learn that they need to work through similar quarantines and they will offer room and board to caregivers. I am thinking something similar to the positions of governesses...that used to be the norm in European aristocracy.
Incidentally, multi-generational households (grandparents, parents, kids) and multi-generational-branched households (grandparents, parents, single uncle/aunt, kids, cousins) that we know in DMV actually did remarkably better because there were many helping hands to take care of things. Also, SAHMs with older kids and telecommuting DH were in a better situation. Single parents or people whose spouses were not with them while they took care of kids, home and their job had it very tough. Since nothing could be outsourced - childcare, food, cleaning, it was incredibly hard. My niece was coping with being alone with her newborn as her husband was recovering from mild COVID symptoms. It has been tough, even though my niece is a very strong young woman. If there was testing available and I could be tested negative for being infective, I would have stayed with her. Thankfully, her ILs are dropping food etc for her.
True for us. We have a nanny and are in a multi-generational household and the lockdown has been incredibly easy and, dare I say enjoyable for us so far
+2. Not multigenerational but I have always worked from home and we still have our wonderful nanny. DH working from home is the only difference. Our nanny is highly educated and much more of a governess-type to begin with. She’s had the older kids learning and really enjoying it while keeping the toddler happy and engaged.
Because of the nature of coronavirus, until we see significant medical advancements or a vaccine, we are going to see a separation of grandparents from the kids for quite awhile longer. In Italy, it was the structure of those multigenerational homes that put the elderly at increased risk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Households with a stay-at-home parent have fared the best during these closures; they already have the infrastructure in place for one designated adult to watch and set up home school for the children while the other parent continues work uninterrupted AND their expenses were already adjusted to one income.
I’m not sure about that. There are two SAHMs in our very close friend group and they are definitely not faring the best. Those of us who are have reasonable employers and flexibility. Also stable paychecks.
+1. I agree. The fear of losing the one and only paycheck coming in is pretty great.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Households with a stay-at-home parent have fared the best during these closures; they already have the infrastructure in place for one designated adult to watch and set up home school for the children while the other parent continues work uninterrupted AND their expenses were already adjusted to one income.
If that 1 earner lost their job, they are SOL
But if they didn’t, they came out on top (with a major stimulus check, too).
If you get a stimulus check you hardly make any money as is. So you’re already broke. So sure it’s the same, fwiw.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Households with a stay-at-home parent have fared the best during these closures; they already have the infrastructure in place for one designated adult to watch and set up home school for the children while the other parent continues work uninterrupted AND their expenses were already adjusted to one income.
I’m not sure about that. There are two SAHMs in our very close friend group and they are definitely not faring the best. Those of us who are have reasonable employers and flexibility. Also stable paychecks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Households with a stay-at-home parent have fared the best during these closures; they already have the infrastructure in place for one designated adult to watch and set up home school for the children while the other parent continues work uninterrupted AND their expenses were already adjusted to one income.
This seems stupidly obvious.
All the SAHMs I know have cracked under the pressure of having school age kids home all day every day without any respite. No school. No classes on Saturday. A lot of alcohol themed posts on social media.
It is clearly harder to work and perform childcare simultaneously. This isn’t even a philosophical matter, there are simply only so many hours in a day.
Anonymous wrote:Households with a stay-at-home parent have fared the best during these closures; they already have the infrastructure in place for one designated adult to watch and set up home school for the children while the other parent continues work uninterrupted AND their expenses were already adjusted to one income.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a really cushy 6 figure job with a lot of flexibility that gives me a lot of time with my kids--I get out in time to pick them up.
To hear DCUM tell it, you’d think every woman has this kind of job.
You can be sure these sorts of jobs will be going the way of the ape in the coming recession/depression.